Joe Biden and Kamala Harris in 2024?
Who else is a bit dubious that they will be the Democratic nominees? I cringe when I hear Biden sound bites. He is sounding more like one of those old crazy muppets in the balcony every day. Kamala is out there somewhere but clearly the DNC are not promoting her as a potential President should something happen to Joe.
Should they consider alternatives or is it too late to change nominees?
Last thing I want to see is return of the MAGA’s in Washington. Please make America a good neighbour again.
For what it’s worth here is one US hero that would be up for the job. Everyone loves a hero and Admiral McRaven sure knows how to give a great speech! He’s a Democrat too.
The Dems have never really owned up to how much suckage they have inside their own party. Since 2016, I think their game plan has been "they other side are a bunch of openly crazy & evil scumbags, you if you do not want that, you have to accept whatever candidates we give you". Well yes, the other (GOP) side demonstrates more and more every day that they
are a bunch of crazy evil scumbags, eagerly doing things that 20 years ago would be career-enders, and which 50 years ago mean doing prison time.
But the part about voters having to swallow whatever well-connected mediocres the DNC coughs up did not work in 2016, so why would it work wonders in 2024? Biden's administration might have done overall positive things, but nobody thinks he's up for another 4 years except himself and his own inner circle; the party members are also not enthusiastic about VP Harris being "automatically next". Never mind what mud the GOP throws at them, I think the Dems have painted themselves into a corner. They do not think they can lose to a GOP that proves itself more crooked, deranged, and dysfunctional every day. Well, how's that assumption actually panning out? (Hint: It's not.) Clearly, VIRTUE is not deciding elections, so they better get themselves a backup plan, ASAP.
The baffling thing is, like you pointed out, there are examples of better, more charismatic, more gutsy candidates in their party, but the DNC brass seems allergic to actually choosing them. It's not a matter of being "too radical", because:
1) They could have the most DINO moderate as the candidate, and still be called "radical, far left" by their shameless GOP opponents; they get zero credit for being reasonable & bipartisan, ever;
2) There is zero evidence that voters turn away from strong ideology rather than towards it; even the swing voters (if those even exist) seem to appreciate people with some strength of conviction, "tough talk for tough times".
Anyway, I hope the Dems get their shit together, because frankly, barely hanging on while waiting for the other side to come to its senses is not a sound strategy. It's wishful thinking, and does not jibe with any of the times they have actually won elections.