Asian Fever

Trump for President. Who's hopping on the bandwagon? Who's digging a bunker?

huggzy

Banned
May 30, 2010
616
3
18
Hillary’s Two Official Favors To Morocco Resulted In $28 Million For Clinton...

Hillary’s Two Official Favors To Morocco Resulted In $28 Million For Clinton Foundation


http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/31/h...esulted-in-28-million-for-clinton-foundation/


Hillary Clinton did two huge favors for Morocco during her tenure as secretary of state while the Clinton Foundation accepted up to $28 million in donations from the country’s ruler, King Mohammed VI, according to new information obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group.

Clinton and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) chief Lisa Jackson tried to shut down the Florida-based Mosaic Company in 2011, operator of America’s largest phosphate mining facility.

Jackson’s close ties and loyalty to the Clintons were revealed when she joined the Clinton Foundation’s board of directors in 2013, just months after she left the EPA. Jackson is also close to John Podesta, Clinton’s national campaign chairman.

Morocco’s state-owned phosphate company, OCP, would ostensibly have benefited from Jackson’s move to shut down Mosaic. Mohammed donated up to $15 million to the Clinton Foundation through OCP.

Clinton also relaxed U.S. foreign aid restrictions on Morocco, thus allowing U.S. funds to be used in the territory of Western Sahara where OCP operates phosphate mining operations. The aid restrictions stemmed from Morocco’s illegal occupation of the territory since 1974.

Morocco is repeatedly condemned for seizing the territory and for unilaterally extracting the country’s valuable minerals, impoverishing what’s left of the local Sahrawi Arabs.
No nation recognizes Moroccan sovereignty over the Western Sahara and the United Nation’s Security Council legal office and the International Court of Justice both demand that Muhammed withdraw his claim over the territory and end illegal extraction of minerals.

An email WikiLeaks made public last week illustrated how Clinton, while acting as secretary of state, negotiated an additional $12 million donation to the Clinton Foundation from Muhammed in return for holding the 2015 Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) meeting in Marrakech, Morocco. Another $1 million payment came from OCP to cover the expenses of the CGI meeting. (RELATED: Hillary Got $12 Million for Clinton Charity As Quid Pro Quo For Morocco Meeting)


The regulatory assault against the U.S. phosphate industry began in earnest when Jackson launched a barrage of intimidating regulatory initiatives against Mosaic. Environmental concerns about phosphates date from 1979 but the EPA did little to address concerns related to phosphate mining until Jackson’s 2011 moves.

The regulatory assault on the U.S. phosphate industry encompassed several agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). DHS aircraft flew at low altitudes over Mosaic’s central Florida operations in search of environmental problems. The EPA also threatened large Superfund penalties, which could have bankrupted Mosaic.

Phosphates are essential ingredients in fertilizers used in American farming. Closing or reducing Mosaic’s output would have cost tens of thousands of American jobs and injured the country’s agricultural productivity.

It also would leave the U.S. dependent upon foreign phosphate producers, but particularly Morocco’s OCP. The only other countries that mine phosphates are Russia, China and Saudi Arabia.

Rep. Dennis Ross, a Republican congressman who represents the Florida district where Mosaic operates, told TheDCNF he now sees why the EPA went after Mosaic.

“The tactics makes perfect sense as to why the EPA, under Lisa Jackson’s tutelage, targeted Mosaic’s phosphate operations in my district. I was never given any answers when I questioned Lisa Jackson about the EPA’s deliberate actions against Mosaic,” Ross told TheDCNF.

“Now I know why. An environmental concern never existed. This targeting was all done as a payback to Morocco for donating millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation,” Ross said.

An uproar from Florida regulators push-back from the state’s congressional delegation and the agency’s tenuous legal position all forced the EPA to end its threats against Mosaic.

Rep. Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican who is vice-chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and a vocal critic of the Clinton Foundation, agreed with Ross, saying “these facts seem to reveal the possibility of more pay-to-play activities at the Clinton Foundation.”

“It would be especially troubling if the Clinton Foundation was working with the EPA to suppress the American phosphate industry in favor of Morocco. The EPA and Clinton Foundation should be forthcoming about their dealings with the Moroccan government and the American phosphate industry.”

Clinton’s 2012 support of a rider on the U.S. foreign aid bill permitting foreign aid to be sent to the Western Sahara arguably legitimized Moroccan occupation of territory and depopulated the Sahrawi Arabs. Native Moroccans were sent into the country by the government to extract the minerals.

The rider approved by Clinton said that U.S. foreign aid funds “may be used in regions and territories administered by Morocco,” meaning, the Western Sahara. The Western Sahara is classified a “Non-Self-Governing Territory” under international law.

“Previously, United States excluded Western Sahara from bilateral assistance to avoid seeming to endorse Moroccan control,” said Eugene Kontorovich, a professor at Northwestern University School of Law, in a legal review of occupied territories around the world.

Hans Corell, the U.N. Security Council’s Under-Secretary for Legal Affairs, said in January 2002 that “if further exploration and exploitation activities were to proceed in disregard of the interests and wishes of the people of Western Sahara, they would be in violation of the international law principles applicable to mineral resource activities in Non-Self-Governing Territories.”

A Dec. 10, 2015 report by the International Court of Justice ruled that “the sovereignty of the Kingdom of Morocco over Western Sahara is not recognized by the European Union or its Member States, or more generally by the UN, and the absence of any international mandate capable of justifying Moroccan presence on that territory.”

But none of that mattered to former President Bill Clinton, who said nothing about the world’s condemnation of Morocco’s exploitation of the area for its phosphate industry, while speaking at the Clinton Foundation’s 2015 Marrakech CGI conference. Instead, he praised it.

“The Moroccans who are here will tell you that in the last several years, they have become the Saudi Arabia of phosphates, and what they have done with it, to diversify their economy and to make it part of a comprehensive strategy instead of another example of resource curse, is very impressive indeed,” Clinton said.

“Hillary Clinton sold her soul when they accepted that money,” reported Politico the day after the Marrakech CGI conference.
 

carvesg

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2010
1,337
1,471
113
Holy s..... , conspiracy theorists have taken over the site . While down south they wanna elect their conspiracy theorists in chef . Gotta say they are good at convincing the uninformed ....feelings over facts .
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,645
828
113





Melania Trump..another example of an immigrant doing a job Americans won't........:lol:














 
Last edited:

FreeG

Well-known member
Dec 25, 2015
545
323
63
Alas, these Clinton emails will likely highlight (if they don't already) that she and Bill do/have done what most politicians do, no better, no worse. With MOST politicians, I'd say, its a combination of desire for power and a desire to do things for the country (I would argue that for some, the appearance of doing things for the country/state gives them power, for others getting the power then allows them to do things for the country - I personally believe both Clintons are the latter, tho I'll admit I can't prove it. I think Clinton's worst sin is she stubbornly refuses to admit she's made a mistake (regarding home email server, for instance) which is a symptom of arrogance but she still has far more experience and knowledge. So she's not as lovable as Obama or Bush - big deal; a bit more of a technocrat may do us some good.

I still feel what Trump has done (regarding his avoidance of taxes to benefit himself, inability to run businesses that then ends up putting real people out of work, his long history of sexual assaults on women) and continues to do (incite and encourage hate, refuse to learn any of the issues facing this country and planet to ANY deep degree, lie about his past and refuse to acknowledge ALMOST all past issues) make him a FAR worse choice for this country and the world.
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,645
828
113
Uncleg to FreeG...she has admitted to the home server being a mistake and she has apologized for it....anything I haven't heard about.
 

InnocentBoy

Banned
Mar 5, 2006
845
6
18
Facts? I'd love for you to come up with some to prove your point.
Holy s..... , conspiracy theorists have taken over the site . While down south they wanna elect their conspiracy theorists in chef . Gotta say they are good at convincing the uninformed ....feelings over facts .
 

Tugela

New member
Oct 26, 2010
1,913
1
0
Oh, and today we find out that Rudy Guilliani was smugly telling interviewers on Fox News that they had something really big a few days BEFORE Comey made his announcement. The same Rudy Guiliani who was US attorney in NY and worked with the very people in the NY FBI office who have been obsessive about the Clintons (even when justice department prosecutors told them there was no case), and the very people who discovered Weiners laptop. Coincidence? Yeah, right.

All of this has obviously been orchestrated by Guilliani's gang at the NY FBI office, and it is being done with specific intent of derailing Clinton's campaign to the benefit of Trump. It is blatant partisan interference by the FBI.

There definitely needs to be a special prosecutor appointed, not to investigate Clinton, but to investigate Gulliani and his NY FBI buddies.
 

carvesg

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2010
1,337
1,471
113
Facts? I'd love for you to come up with some to prove your point.[/QUOTE

Just fact check what they all say .... Trump lies over 70% based on his statements , Cruz , Giuliani, Sanders, Bidden, Clinton HRC . Cruz lies more than Trump , Sanders lies more than Hillary but just by one pourcent based on their speeches and statements .

But nobody can embellish / theorize / hyperbolize like that multi millionaire can ....and I'll never call him billionaire until he can prove it . ( If we use he's own technic of scepticism to turn the burden of proof on his own shoulders as he often use with others )
 
Last edited:

FreeG

Well-known member
Dec 25, 2015
545
323
63
Uncleg to FreeG...she has admitted to the home server being a mistake and she has apologized for it....anything I haven't heard about.
True. I was thinking more that it took such a long time for her to admit it, preceded by defensiveness.
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,645
828
113
True. I was thinking more that it took such a long time for her to admit it, preceded by defensiveness.

Kind of like this "hobby".......get caught by somebody important to you and I'll bet you'll deny, deny....and be defensive as hell until such time as it becomes counter-productive.
 

huggzy

Banned
May 30, 2010
616
3
18
I would be very cautious about the Washington Times as a source. It is a subsidiary of the "Moonies" cult / church.
Yeah, it was more the source that was being relied on - fucking douchebag. Can't help it if we get bad info from the news media.
 

huggzy

Banned
May 30, 2010
616
3
18
Oh, and today we find out that Rudy Guilliani was smugly telling interviewers on Fox News that they had something really big a few days BEFORE Comey made his announcement. The same Rudy Guiliani who was US attorney in NY and worked with the very people in the NY FBI office who have been obsessive about the Clintons (even when justice department prosecutors told them there was no case), and the very people who discovered Weiners laptop. Coincidence? Yeah, right.

All of this has obviously been orchestrated by Guilliani's gang at the NY FBI office, and it is being done with specific intent of derailing Clinton's campaign to the benefit of Trump. It is blatant partisan interference by the FBI.

There definitely needs to be a special prosecutor appointed, not to investigate Clinton, but to investigate Gulliani and his NY FBI buddies.
Yeah...but you keep straying from the real issue Tuggy. You see, apparently you need some other authority to tell you that something doesn't smell right rather than using your own critical thinking ability. So how about this - Clinton Inc. just admitted this evening that it took millions of $$$ from Qatar on Billy's birthday while she was Secretary of State and conveniently neglected to report it:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...tion-idUSKBN12Z2SL+&cd=11&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

The Clinton Foundation has confirmed it accepted a $1 million gift from Qatar while Hillary Clinton was U.S. secretary of state without informing the State Department, even though she had promised to let the agency review new or significantly increased support from foreign governments.

Qatari officials pledged the money in 2011 to mark the 65th birthday of Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton's husband, and sought to meet the former U.S. president in person the following year to present him the check, according to an email from a foundation official to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign chairman, John Podesta. The email, among thousands hacked from Podesta's account, was published last month by WikiLeaks.

Clinton signed an ethics agreement governing her family's globe-straddling foundation in order to become secretary of state in 2009. The agreement was designed to increase transparency to avoid appearances that U.S. foreign policy could be swayed by wealthy donors.

If a new foreign government wished to donate or if an existing foreign-government donor, such as Qatar, wanted to "increase materially" its support of ongoing programs, Clinton promised that the State Department's ethics official would be notified and given a chance to raise any concerns.

Clinton Foundation officials last month declined to confirm the Qatar donation. In response to additional questions, a foundation spokesman, Brian Cookstra, this week said that it accepted the $1 million gift from Qatar, but this did not amount to a "material increase" in the Gulf country's support for the charity. Cookstra declined to say whether Qatari officials received their requested meeting with Bill Clinton.

Officials at Qatar's embassy in Washington and in its Council of Ministers in the capital, Doha, declined to discuss the donation.

The State Department has said it has no record of the foundation submitting the Qatar gift for review, and that it was incumbent on the foundation to notify the department about donations that needed attention. A department spokeswoman did not respond to additional questions about the donation.

According to the foundation's website, which lists donors in broad categories by cumulative amounts donated, Qatar's government has directly given a total of between $1 million and $5 million over the years.

The Clinton Foundation has said it would no longer accept money from foreign governments if Clinton is elected president and would spin off those programs that are dependent on foreign governments.

"MATERIAL" INCREASE

At least eight other countries besides Qatar gave new or increased funding to the foundation, in most cases to fund its health project, without the State Department being informed, according to foundation and agency records. They include Algeria, which gave for the first time in 2010, and the United Kingdom, which nearly tripled its support for the foundation's health project to $11.2 million between 2009 and 2012.

Foundation officials have said some of those donations, including Algeria, were oversights and should have been flagged, while others, such as the UK increase, did not qualify as material increases.

The foundation has declined to describe what sort of increase in funding by a foreign government would have triggered notification of the State Department for review. Cookstra said the agreement was designed to "allow foreign funding for critical Clinton Foundation programs" to continue without disruption.

The State Department said it has no record of being asked by the foundation to review any increases in support by a foreign government.

Asked whether Qatar was funding a specific program at the foundation, Cookstra said the country supported the organization's "overall humanitarian work."

"Qatar continued supporting Clinton Foundation at equal or lower levels" compared with the country's pre-2009 support, he said. He declined to say if Qatar gave any money during the first three years of Clinton's four-year term at the State Department, or what its support before 2009 amounted to.

In another email released by WikiLeaks, a former Clinton Foundation fundraiser said he raised more than $21 million in connection with Bill Clinton's 65th birthday in 2011.

Spokesmen for Hillary Clinton's campaign and Bill Clinton did not respond to emailed questions about the donation.

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said that major donors to the Clinton Foundation may have obtained favored access to Clinton's State Department, but has provided little evidence to that effect. Clinton and her staff have dismissed this accusation as a political smear.

.
 
L

Larry Storch

"Psychologists find that distrust of authority and low agreeableness are among factors underlying the willingness to believe."
Not a slam on you mars, but it doesn't take a psychologist to figure that out. :D

What really irritates me about this thread is people posting long winded, often copy and pasted statements/info; and then someone quoting the entire post only to add their own long winded etc.etc.
You're making it difficult for me to scroll through all the garbage to find the nuggets.
 

CrazedandAbused

Active member
Aug 4, 2015
142
34
28
Austin, Texas
I'm not on the bandwagon yet.

Hillary's probably gonna win, but it's nice to see those smug assholes shitting their pants at the last minute.

America's sending a message (too bad they might have to shoot the messenger if he wins !)
 

PuntMeister

Punt-on!
Jul 13, 2003
2,276
1,416
113
What really irritates me about this thread is people posting long winded, often copy and pasted statements/info; and then someone quoting the entire post only to add their own long winded etc.etc.
You're making it difficult for me to scroll through all the garbage to find the nuggets.
Yeah, I have to agree with you on this point Larry. My scrolling finger is getting sore. Please just quote the nuggets, or the bits you are commenting on peops. Sheesh. Yet there are some good nuggets in all that chaff. And I was hoping to get some countrary opinions to promote reasoned consideration way back when starting this thread. So on eve of the shit-show and the dawn of America's choice, thankyou all who have contributed your facts, allegations, conspiracy theories, accusations, insights, and especially humour to this marathon. I wish a 'Cole's Notes' version of this saucy thread were required reading for all registered US voters. Oh well, I do have my fantasies... Lol.

Digging my bunker 1 metre deeper and adding another two-four of canned beans today!

-Punt.
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,645
828
113

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,645
828
113
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,645
828
113
The Punt Bunker...........


 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts