Donald Trump is an arrogant, egomaniacal, unqualified, sexist, racist, WASPy pig who has earned his wealth through the advantage of his father's money, his connections and generous US law that allows guys like him to lose $1 billion and then not have to pay income tax for the next 18 years. Despite all that I don't think he's evil. He's definitely not qualified. He definitely lacks a social conscious. But I don't think he's evil.
Hillary Clinton is pure evil. If you can't see that after all the bullshit that has been dumped on us than you're lying to yourselves. This bitch would sell her soul just to get elected. She has already sold herself in a "business decision" by staying married to a guy who dragged her through hell and back. Who on earth would pay Hillary Clinton $225,000 an evening to listen to her speak? Have any of you ever heard her say ANYTHING in a speech that was even remotely thought-provoking, inspirational, insightful or original?!?! (other than some of the Wikileaks info where she's speaking to the Brazilian banks saying that she has these dreams of completely open borders, etc)
There is nothing but a hollow shell with her as everything that comes out of her mouth is an echo reverberating from a political payoff. Her Haiti charity is nothing but a cash machine used to collect money from foreign governments and to connect political interest groups to her while directing money and construction contracts to the friends of Clinton. She voted to invade Iraq even though everyone knew there were no weapons of mass destruction. Her tenure as Secretary of State has been a complete disaster - US foreign relations has never been worse, and that's saying alot when you're compared to administrations like those under G.W. Bush. I think she would even kill babies just to get herself elected I think that she is that corrupt (wait...what!?!?? Oh yeah...I did go there!)
And how on earth can a citizen vote for a candidate in good conscience when they know 100% that she deleted those 33,000 emails which were subpoenaed by the courts - that alone should disqualify her from becoming a president of the United States because she really should be indicted criminally for that act alone.
Hell...she may very well get indicted weeks after these election results if there is anything to these reports coming out that the FBI is reopening their investigation of her. They would 100% definitely not announce they were doing this right now right before a presidential election unless there was something really bad that's come up.
Would I ever vote for Donald Trump? Never, unless a gun were put to my head. Unfortunately being paired up with Hillary Clinton would be akin to having a gun to your head. The other Independent candidates - Gary Johnson, Jill Stein and Evan McMullin would probably all be better choices by default if they weren't a waste of a vote.
At least with Donald Trump you might have a guy who wants to pull the Wizard's curtain back and let us take a peek at what goes on behind the scenes, and maybe even throw a wrench at the military industrial complex. I think he could be a horrible president, but if he's voted in maybe just maybe there's hope that the political elite get exposed for who they are.
Not that that's going to happen.
Funny thing is that I like Obama, and I even liked Bill until the Clintons got exposed. But the more shit I see with the establishment the more I want them all to get nuked off the face of the earth. And I don't think for one second that Hillary doesn't enjoy having some puppeteers hand up her ass directing her to do exactly as they say while greasing the skids for her and her boy Bill.
Actually, the list you made about Trump is pretty much what evil is all about, lol. You complain about the Clinton foundation, but at least they are actually doing charity. Trump's foundation is a "charity" that uses its money to pay off financial obligations for his companies, put paintings of himself in his properties, and provide police organizations with money to have events at HIS resorts.
Clinton is not evil. She is a career politician who has dedicated her life to public service. I am not sure why there is so much vitriol directed against her. My best guess about that is because she is a strong willed woman who made a career beyond her husband, and conservatives hate that. It is interesting that pretty much the same thing was done against Obama, except that in his case it was because he was black. I guess that is just the conservative way, they respect greed, not public service. We see this time and time again, they just make a whole bunch of stuff up then go crazy. Tea party shit - these people are delusional. Oh, and before you start ranting about liberals defending their own, let me point out that in the previous two elections I supported Romney and McCain, because I felt they were the better candidates. I supported Bush snr, but I thought his son was an idiot and not worthy of the office. This time round Clinton is clearly the better of the two up for election. I don't choose one party or the other, I choose who I think is the best candidate, someone who is centrist and neither left nor right wing.
She got paid a large sum of money to make a speech. Guess what, a high profile politico gets paid that, there is nothing unusual about it. Ok, so YOU won't get paid to do that, but the reason for that is that you are a nobody. That is not the case with Clinton, and people will pay to have her speak to them. That is why retired politicians go on the speaking circuit, how do you think all of them earn a living after office? It is from speeches and directorships. Put this to you: how much does the average member of a NBA or NFL team get paid for playing a game? Or making a paid appearance/endorsement? Not too far what Clinton got paid.
Regarding the emails, so what? It was not illegal for her to keep a private email server. That has already been established. I think you could argue that she made a poor decision in that regard, and that she probably had secrecy in mind when she did it, which is kind of ironic when you think about it. She did manage to keep secrets secret after all.
She won't get indicted after the election. These emails are apparently Abedin's, and if anything there is from Clinton, it will be the other end of what was already on her own server. So nothing new. They will go through it, and look at Abedin's correspondence, but that does not impact Clinton. When announcing his action, the director himself said they didn't know what was in the files, so it is likely that nothing new is there. More disturbing however is that he chose to announce it at all . Apparently it is policy at the FBI not to make any announcements of this sort 60 days prior to an election, and this applies to all level of government, from federal down to county. It obviously is going to impact on the election, and if it turns out that there is nothing new in these e-mails there are going to be serious questions asked about interference in the electoral process.
Trump will NOT allow you a peek into the inner workings of government. If anything he is going to be secrecy on steroids far worse than Clinton, judging from past behavior, and he will use the apparatus of the state to silence anyone who disagrees with him. The guy is a bully, has a thin skin and holds a grudge to a crazy degree. Be critical and suddenly you will have the IRS and FBI all over you. He is by far the scariest of the two. Elect him and you can kiss your civil liberty goodbye.
Bill Clinton was a pretty good president, one of the better in recent history. His only downside really was his philandering, but that was really something between him and his wife, it did not involve everyone else.
