Taking into consideration that paying after the fact is not the norm here, and taking into consideration, that for a variety of reasons, there would only be a select few that would make it onto this said list. If you were to make a list of providers who are willing to be paid after the fact, it would likely attract people who would rip them off AND if they are the type who are willing to rip off an SP, then they are quite possibly the type to be rough, push boundaries, steal and other unsavoury characteristics.
That is a well reasoned reply.
I'd think that thieves would more often tend to be physicly abusive than non thieves,
but have no data or stats to back that up. I'm sure a lot would depend on other
factors, such as if she were willing to tackle him as he attempted a "take the
cash and dash", as one SP in this thread has stated she is prepared to do. I think
there are plenty of others of the same mind, and i'd be more concerned for their
safety than any local SP's who'd publicly offer postpayment but let the thief go.
As i've stated earlier, i see little difference between postpayment and leaving
the money in the open where the customer sees it during a session.
But your theory is certainly within the realm of possibilities, i grant you that.
As i've mentioned earlier, i feel there could also be the flipside of possible
benefits, as detailed in post #68. A girl could also obtain the backup &/or do the
screening sufficient to keep herself relatively safe from both thefts & assualts.
BTW, I wonder how many have backup, as going without might be many times more
dangerous than the scenario you describe above.
If your theory were true, though, then does this happen often in Thailand where
postpayment to SWs is the rule? And if it does, then why does the same rule
continue? If such abuse by thieving types seldom happens there, then why not?
1. Because most customers are well to do holidayers or businessman, who couldn't be
bothered withholding a mere $15 or $30 or whatever if he's not satisfied or upset
with her? They are not inclined to be thieves, at least not for such a piddly amount?
2. Because TGs are so sweet and rarely if ever disappoint? So thieves are melted,
hypnotized, and temporarily reformed by TG "magic"?
3. Because he is scared of the consequences or what she might do if he doesn't pay?
Thieves are intimidated by the potential emotional craziness {cut your balls off}
of TGs or being in a foreign country, etc?
4. Because he wants to get rid of her quick without listening to her bawling, etc,
so he can try another girl? Thief is intimidated by TG emotions? {They have a rep
for being the world's best acresses, btw}.
5. Because Thai SWs speak to the client in person and are thereby able to weed out
the bad apples through how the guy looks and talks, their spidey senses, women's
intuition, psychic powers, esp, etc? So thieves get rejected by TGs?
I don't know why Thai SWs allow postpayment while MP's there go the prepayment
route. You'ld think the latter have the backup so they don't need cash upfront.
With bargirls, BTW, it is usually a kind of middle of the road thing, paying
the barfine up front, but paying her for her company after the night is done.
Even MP's, though, are not immune from violence. Re the famous Annies of Bangkok,
the owner Aey spoke online about a guy who badly injured and knocked unconscious
a female employee while they were in one of the private rooms together. He was
not a thief, as he had to pay upfront. He walked out calmly, speaking to Aey for
a minute on the way out, then disappeared into the night, never to be found. This
was apparently all premeditated, i.e. that was what he came there for.
