USA Political Thread 2023

Status
Not open for further replies.

golferjohn

Well-known member
Dec 25, 2015
1,331
422
83
This a serious geopolitical challenge to America but I do not believe President Biden is up to the challenge.
Up to the challenge of taking-out a balloon that a pimply-faced tween w/a drone could disable? The US tracked it from Alaska, then across your great country, down through Montana and finally shot it down off the coast of Carolina. Remove your Fox hat and try a bit of common-sense...ask why this was allowed to proceed through its manuvers while being monitored by anyone w/a pair of binoculars. Whatever The Chinese were 'trying' to spy on was most definitely met with a Wiley Coyote 'hit it here' sign on the ground.

Now I gotta get back to Gym Jordan's compelling hearings about why Twitter won't let us see Hunter's dick
 

carvesg

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2010
1,275
1,354
113
Up to the challenge of taking-out a balloon that a pimply-faced tween w/a drone could disable? The US tracked it from Alaska, then across your great country, down through Montana and finally shot it down off the coast of Carolina. Remove your Fox hat and try a bit of common-sense...ask why this was allowed to proceed through its manuvers while being monitored by anyone w/a pair of binoculars. Whatever The Chinese were 'trying' to spy on was most definitely met with a Wiley Coyote 'hit it here' sign on the ground.

Now I gotta get back to Gym Jordan's compelling hearings about why Twitter won't let us see Hunter's dick
Golferjohn you are like a Greek philosopher stating the obvious. But you prose is just lacking on the poetry this morning. I totally agree with your assessment

I read that the US was scrambling the communications being transmitted all along .
Could partial or full data collected over the US and Canada have been sent we might never know. Bringing it down over water might have preserved a good portion of the equipment for analysis instead of smashing it to smithereens on the ground or imbedded deep into the ground which is as hard to retrieve than something in deep water . Lucky bastards doing the salvaging are in 50' of water for most of the debris...I'd say a pretty lucky strike from the air force pilot.
 
Last edited:

rlock

Well-known member
May 20, 2015
2,282
1,371
113
How would this tween disable it?
If it was so easy someone would have done it.

Really. Children huh ?


Meanwhile at Chinese intelligence HQ:






In any case, the USAF shot down another (lower and apparently different) balloon over Alaska just this afternoon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kissmepassionately

jgg

In the air again.
Apr 14, 2015
2,745
921
113
Varies now
...Bringing it down over water might have preserved a good portion of the equipment for analysis instead of smashing it to smithereens on the ground or imbedded deep into the ground which is as hard to retrieve than something in deep water . Lucky bastards doing the salvaging are in 50' of water for most of the debris...I'd say a pretty lucky strike from the air force pilot.
A fall from 300 feet into the water would be like falling onto concrete.
 

carvesg

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2010
1,275
1,354
113
A fall from 300 feet into the water would be like falling onto concrete.
I'm guessing that they were hoping for a lesser than high velocity crash as things seemed to be linked by cables, solar panels, antennas and other not too aerodynamic devices under the balloon which might have slowed down the fall a bit . "If" the missile didn't destroy everything after the initial explosion.... hopefully they lessen the charge to be a bit more surgical about it.
 

RATTLE

Member
Jan 14, 2004
388
225
43
huckleberry fields
Things Trump cheats at:
- marriages
- business
- taxes
- news
- politics (generally)
- primaries​
- supreme court picks​
- trade agreements​
- foreign policy / alliances​
- dealing with COVID​
- elections (one win & one loss despite this)​
- giving back secret documents when told to

Who is even surprised? It's like a bank robber parking their getaway car at an expired meter.

But golf? Oh no, not golf ! Shame, shame !

Golf. The "sport" where you ride around in carts because walking is too strenuous, and have servants around to carry your clubs. :rolleyes:
If you want an insight on Trumps golf game. There is an excellent book on him and golf. Called Commander in Cheat by sports writer Rick Reilly. A New York Time’s bestseller from 2019. Great read.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimDandy

golferjohn

Well-known member
Dec 25, 2015
1,331
422
83
How would this tween disable it?
sorry, perhaps I should have used 'a hill-billy with a bottle rocket'...the point being that the balloon posed no threat (and I'd argue that it presented an intelligence opportunity) and allowing it to be monitored/followed/reverse-engineered is a far better strategy than a knee-jerk response hailed by the brain trust of Gates, Greene & Bobert
 

rlock

Well-known member
May 20, 2015
2,282
1,371
113
sorry, perhaps I should have used 'a hill-billy with a bottle rocket'...the point being that the balloon posed no threat (and I'd argue that it presented an intelligence opportunity) and allowing it to be monitored/followed/reverse-engineered is a far better strategy ...
No doubt that's what they're doing now with the blasted remains of these balloons.
 

ModSquad

Moderator
Jan 19, 2020
544
2,461
93
I saw an interview with Marco Rubio and he was on a bit of a rant about the potential danger these balloons posed and the Dem WH was doing nothing.

The interviewer reminded him that the same occurrence happened 3X during the Trump presidency.

Jaw drop. Rubio was literally speechless.
 

JimDandy

Well-known member
May 17, 2004
3,107
668
113
68
Lower Mainland, B.C.
sorry, perhaps I should have used 'a hill-billy with a bottle rocket'...the point being that the balloon posed no threat (and I'd argue that it presented an intelligence opportunity) and allowing it to be monitored/followed/reverse-engineered is a far better strategy than a knee-jerk response hailed by the brain trust of Gates, Greene & Bobert
Not as easy as you might think:

https://eurasiantimes.com/1000-roun...loon-using-best-of-fighter-jets-25-years-ago/

JD
 

80watts

Banned
May 20, 2004
3,284
1,231
113
Victoria
Why a balloon. Travels closer to the ground then satellites. Less interference from atmosphere/weather. Travels slowly across the world. Satelites travel very fast and to get info back has to transmit data, which can be picked up.
 

golferjohn

Well-known member
Dec 25, 2015
1,331
422
83
Why a balloon. Travels closer to the ground then satellites. Less interference from atmosphere/weather. Travels slowly across the world. Satelites travel very fast and to get info back has to transmit data, which can be picked up.
cuz the previous 3 weren't detected (and quite possibly successful)...Rubio's face was priceless
 

80watts

Banned
May 20, 2004
3,284
1,231
113
Victoria
The US is not worried about pictures or even open communications. Everything they have to hide is buried or done through fibre optic cables. Shit the Americans loved what they found in Germany at the end of WW2. The autobann. The reason for the new highway system in the 1950s ....
The forest factories and underground manufacturing places... With American spyplanes into the 80s, you think the Americans would know that to hide something you bury it underground. Dig tunnels far underground between key places. Put in place underground factories with stored raw resources etc. Or a portion of equipment placed in underground prepared sites.
Since Pearl Harbour, Americans have done alot of planning. Even pre WW2 plans for invasions of any country that could be a threat had invasion plans, even Canada got one.
Consider the nuclear threat of the cold war. A great bomb shelter would be at least 200 feet below or farther. Now connect the bomb shelters. On a irradiated surface, travel below the surface.
More underground then what balloons or satelites can see....
 

rlock

Well-known member
May 20, 2015
2,282
1,371
113
Balloons are not that easy to detect, with no transponder and no heat signature to give them away (unlike a missile launch which sattellites can detect).
Fox reported that a Sidewinder missile was fired at one and missed, but a sidewinder is a heat-seeker, so this is not surprising. Not really that surprising that they would try to find out if they could be shot down without using a radar-guided missile. (Remember the radar signatures might be the very intelligence secret that the spy balloons were trying to discover.)

However, the big 1st one they supposedly knew about since it launched from Hainan island, China. US intelligence did not want to let it be known that they knew about it, because they wanted to study the balloon without the Chinese knowing that they knew. But the civilian guys in Montana who reported on it made it impossible for them to keep that on the D-L anymore. Once that was in the open, the cycle of balloon detecting & destroying kicked off.

Apparently they are not even sure that the balloons other than the 1st one were the intelligence gathering kind. Could be commercial. Shot them down because the policy got switched to "fuck all balloons".

Google used to use balloons for projects like trying to bring internet to remote areas, and scrapped the idea in 2021. It's not known whether they or any other company uses them for mapping purposes. Quite possible.
In any case, the Chinese government seemed interested in their balloon tech also.

Well, I do not know if this will affect military / intelligence balloons, but officials in various places are now calling for [big/high-altitude] balloons to start having transponders and file flight plans just like other aircraft. Probably for the best if that change is made.
Ditto for drones. When you think about it, drones can take many shapes, so calling these spy balloons drones is not out of the question if they are able to manuoever. An unsanctioned flight of anything these days is risky & intrusive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts