Mao was worse.Sounds just like Mao Zedong
Mao was worse.Sounds just like Mao Zedong
Apparently Putin is going to declare martial law in Russia tomorrow, so whatever the citizens think won't really matter. Taking dictatorship to the next level.Onlyfans re-instated the russian accounts after 3 days. But these mass sanctions will at least be able to maybe put the gullible Russian civilians on notice. Months of no western comforts and no import export will definitely put people in a crunch.
The problem is selling the news (to make profit). Direct it to the people you want to influence. Problem is: true journalism gives both sides of the issue. Alot of public TV stations in the 1950 (in the US) had a mandate to report both sides. Today we sensationalize news, to seduce people.Sounds like some of those are mainstream news networks but I can’t be for certain. I’m a strong believer in getting info from the initial video source and hearing the person say it versus hearing a network quote them. Sadly, a popular source has been TikTok simply because it’s people on the front lines posting videos.
I related this to Ukraine because the mainstream news has been blatantly inaccurate in their reporting. So when I see a video of Ukraine/Russia I question how accurate it is. There is no way that they are reporting accurately now. There must be some discrepancies.
He is already in an dictatorship, look at how he corrected a member of his Counsil of Ministers, when he stated they should try and negotiate with the Ukraine.Apparently Putin is going to declare martial law in Russia tomorrow, so whatever the citizens think won't really matter. Taking dictatorship to the next level.
If they don't control inflation and we see 1980 interest rates. That'll be our market soon too.
That's pretty true.I meant it as the news in general. The way media is going is that if it doesn’t fit the narrative, it doesn’t get shown
If any foreigners (non-Ukrainians) get captured on the battlefield by the Russians there, I don't think they'll get treated as regular POWs. Like how they treated foreign ISIS fighters they got in Syria. Whacked.It’s interesting that though the UK, US and others are not sending any troops to the Ukraine. This hasn’t stopped former British SAS and French Foreign Legion of Ukrainian descent from volunteering.
The former SAS are a group of approx 40 between the age of 40 and 60. Apparently sniper teams and those with expertise in missiles. It’s being funded by an unnamed European.
Chrystia Freeland's family is from Ukraine. she has been fighting the Russians her whole life and appears to be instrumental on this front for Canada at the moment.
Behind the push to freeze Moscow’s foreign cash
Trump may have admired Putin for messing with Hillary Clinton, for disliking Obama so much, and having lots of young honeys on the side (Putin always projects being the image of a real "man's man"), so I guess a guy like Putin could manipulate Trump very easily. But it was never the case that the US was actually pro-Russia while Trump was president. If it had been, all this Ukraine-into-NATO shit could have been stopped before Biden ever became president, and then there would be no war today.To add another factor, Trump irresponibility toward Russia and Putin. You can look back and see how Trump drooled over Putin. He pulled out of Syria for him and retreated American participation in areas that Russia wanted to influence. With this retoric of the last year concerning Trump and sore loser position of losing a US election, Trump still tries to hold on to power, still confuses the republican response, makes it look like America is at a verbal civil war, which has allowed Putin to take advantage of the vaccum of confusion.
Today for the anti-Russia headline grabber they talk up their ban on Russian oil imports by Canada, but this Russian oil import ban is symbolic. We have never depended on their oil, nor are they worried about losing Canada as a customer. Anything we get from Russia can be easily made up from other sources (even Iran, if they want to be a bit daring).Can someone explain why Canada. A country flush with oil is importing oil?!
Zelensky is all that, but Azov Battalion and Right Sector are the neo-nazi backbone of what put him the Maidan government in power, and form the elite of Ukraine army (now trained by Canadians). When Washington pulls the strings on both of them, this shit does not matter.Wow, talk about tone deaf and blind. Putin is a total shitbag former/current spy who has had pursued a belligerent world posture and killed his opposition outright, or poisoned then from afar for years. He's systematically plundered their economy for decades for his own gain and that of his cronies. The Ukraine is run by a former TV comedian who has personally put his own life on the line since this thing started. He's a Jew whose great grandfather died in the Holocaust. Lots of jewish neo-nazis out there, you are right on the money.
I am sure they aren't choir boys, but most corrupt? Not even close. Russia, Venezuela, Iran, North Korea, lots of contenders far ahead of them on that list.
NATO means America; America rules NATO, period.Keep in mind the US is one voice among those NATO countries ...but with almost a veto and the most power obviously.... I'll give it to you on that one .
The problem is selling the news (to make profit). Direct it to the people you want to influence. Problem is: true journalism gives both sides of the issue. Alot of public TV stations in the 1950 (in the US) had a mandate to report both sides. Today we sensationalize news, to seduce people.
Any type of news today has to get rid of the personal opinionated verbal diarrhia and Report facts.
Yes different opinions are good. But making it all one sided is bad.
My point being is that news report show will show you a snippet of a video and give you a narrative. First encounter videos allow the view to make their own opinion and interpretation.Maybe you better head over to the front line in Ukrainian and send back personal reports.
AgreedThe problem is selling the news (to make profit). Direct it to the people you want to influence. Problem is: true journalism gives both sides of the issue. Alot of public TV stations in the 1950 (in the US) had a mandate to report both sides. Today we sensationalize news, to seduce people.
Any type of news today has to get rid of the personal opinionated verbal diarrhia and Report facts.
Yes different opinions are good. But making it all one sided is bad.
As the old saying goes you got a point there, if you wore a toque you could cover it.My point being is that news report show will show you a snippet of a video and give you a narrative. First encounter videos allow the view to make their own opinion and interpretation.
I wish I would be able to deal in absolute as you do but sadly I don't . You make good points but the NATO of the 2000s is not the NATO of 1949 .NATO means America; America rules NATO, period.
Nobody seriously thinks the other NATO countries were ever acting in their own interests primarily.
The EU for many years talked about creating a Euro-only military alliance, to counter this very problem of US domination, but it was an idea always opposed by the most pro-US governments (like the UK and Poland).
In the end, it looks now like NATO has completely co-opted the EU, rather than Europe actually standing up for itself. All pretense of European independence from them has disappeared.
(Which when you think of all this, pretty much proves what Russia was always saying to Europe, about why it did not want Ukraine to join either organization.)
https://images.app.goo.gl/WkHY85ND8bgiXfaS8No, you are paying too much attention to the mass media who are saying that the Putin is killing the Ukrainian people when it is actually the Ukrainian military killing it’s own people. Putin is hitting strategic targets that are part of the Khazarian Mafia and all the other parts of a corrupt system. By the way, he is almost finished and a peace deal will be done very soon. Ukrainian people will finally be free of the corruption they have had to live with for way too long, thank you Putin. Too bad you people are on the wrong side of history.
General Patton wanted to continue on and defeat russia after Germany surrendered. He was truly a visionary. How much better off the world would have been if his superiors had listened to him in 1945.I wish I would be able to deal in absolute as you do but sadly I don't . You make good points but the NATO of the 2000s is not the NATO of 1949 .
Let us imaging for a second that Russia with the vast natural ressources that they have on a territory 70% bigger than Canada and 3 times our population would have developed economically without so much mismanagement, corruption and authoritarianism ... What would have been their economic development at this point after the fall of the Soviet Union and the influence they would have gained ?
What would have been the incline of the former communists countries of eastern Europe and the Baltic countries if Russia would have stopped trying to influence them out of nostalgia of their former Empire ? Or what would have been their incline if Russia would have mind their own business in Georgia and other tensions / conflicts with former satellite countries ?
Maybe just maybe some shades of grey has to be added when we draw the picture of how the US and Russia behaved in the last 3 decades and how or what influenced the decisions of former communist countries to join NATO
https://images.app.goo.gl/WkHY85ND8bgiXfaS8
If anyone is wondering where Shakerod is in this Russian marching band .... He's the fellow on the far right playing trumpet.
Regardless of my qualifications or naïveté about history.Talk to me when get an education about history. As usual the mainstream media is working with the criminals to protect Biden and Co.