Still avoiding my question like a true sheep. Lord knows you won't.
WHAT WOULD THE WTC'S LOOK LIKE IF THEY WERE BROUGHT DOWN WITH DEMO'S?
ok genius, here it is.
Well before you can have a controlled demolition, certain procedures have to be done.
First, the building has to be emptied of everything that isn't nailed down. Desks, chairs, filing cabinents, computers, etc, you do understand this I hope.
Second, from every controled demoltion I have ever seen, every window has been removed.
Third, preperation time to place explosives in the exact actual places to maximize collapse. Now this from what I have researched will take anywhere from 2-4 weeks, maybe even longer depending upon the type of structure being brought down.
Then there is the amount of personel needed to wire the building. Now the actual amount of explosives would be quite substantial, at least to my little brain, so I am guessing quite a few large trucks hauling the explosives, wiring, det cord etc, not to mention they have to be purchased. I don't think Wal-Mart carries these products. Of course, because of the amount of people and the amount of explosives involved, I again would think this might be quite a bit of money. Honestly, I haven't got the foggiest as to the cost, but I do think it is more than pocket change.
Then you need a safe secure area with good visibility to be able to set the charges off.
Now with every controlled demolition I have ever seen, once the process has been initiated, there should be a staccatto of explosions all throughout the building.
Once the core has been exploded it drops quickly, like your IQ everytime you post.
Now if I am not mistaken, both WTC 1&2 COLLAPSED from the top down. Please mr brilliant, please show me another controlled demo that starts at the top.
Now of course the building in contention with troofers. WTC 7. If you would take your head out of your ass, stop quoting statements that were made on the day of the events, most if not all have been explained and understood by sane rational people.
The Fire Department Chief Daniel Nigro, understood that the building was comprimised because of the debris falling from WTC 2 knocked out the bottom 7 floors of the building, started fires throughout the building. Based on his and his collegues PROFESSIONAL opinion, they vacated the building so as not to loose any other members of the Fire Department. Reports from PROFESSIONAL firemen who heard the building creeking, and visibling moving was enough information the PROFESSIONALS needed to clear the area, and to avoid any other loss of life.
If you come back and start with the garbage about how people heard explosions or statements such as "it sounded like a bomb", then I think you should go back to school and learn what a similie is. In case you don't know, I will give you an example.
Your brain is like that of a knat, only smaller. Now, of course your brain is not really that of a knat, but that would be my statement about it. So, when people say it sounded like a bomb, you have to ask yourself a few questions. How many of these witnesses have ever heard a bomb go off. A car backfiring down the block sounds like a gun being shot. See the difference.. It SOUNDED LIKE a gun going off, but it wasn't a gun.
Now getting back to the demo debate, as far as I know there is only one person who is currently in the demolition business that has said it was a controlled demolition, and he came to that conclusion from only watching the building come down. He has never been to the WTC sight, and has done no further research.
Still with me. Now I have no answer for this question, but I am sure you with your infinite wisdom would know, but how many demolition companies are there in the US. This alone would really narrow down the who could have done this dastardly deed.
Why is it that not one Demolition company in the US or for that matter anywhere else in the world has come forward. Don't you know how much money would be generated from proving this was a controlled demo. Again, this relates to basic human nature. If I can make a buck on it, I will.
Furthermore, WTC 7 was quite a unique building from a number of perspectives. First, from my understanding, it was built over a ConEd substation with numerous fuel tanks containing fuel for back up generators etc, and that it was also kind of hollow near the base of the building. Again, I am just a simpleminded sheep, but right away this seem to explain the concern of the building collapsing.
Now please don't start with your thermite arguement. As far as I am aware, Thermite has NEVER , I REPEAT, NEVER been used in building demolition. Ask yourself this question. Why would the bad guys use something like thermite. Wouldn't any self respecting bad guy want to use the most tried and true method for demolition. Certainly, something of this monumental undertaking, they would not leave anything to chance to fail, would they? Or do you think they came up with the idea that since it has never been used, it would fool all the experts.
The great thing about living in this great country of Canada, is the right to free speech, and to be able to have your own opinion. But, as a wise man once said pertaining to this idea, he said "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, BUT, they are not entitled to their own facts."
Now feel free to hurl nasty explenitives at me if it makes you feel better, but it won't change the fact that you are a very sad man with a brain like a knat. (SIMILIE)
In conclusion, I just want to state the obvious. That is, why do all the troofers believe every statement made by people without any expertise in these areas, while either ignoring or calling all the real experts government dupes or liars. Funny, isn't it?
