New World Order

zaig

Active member
Nov 21, 2003
283
32
28
I want him to tell me what the WTC's would look like IF THEY WERE DEMO'd. Not that a controlled demo and 9/11 look diff. What would it look like if the towers were still there and for some reason they need to be brought down. What would that look like? Describe it? How long would it take to collapse? Large dust clouds and vaporized concrete perhaps?


And lets not get into all the insider trading. Put options on UA and AA. The coincedences never stop...

Heres M from 007.... 1:07
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tWQ9vNlK0s

You do know the difference between make believe and reality. Now you are using 007 movies for evidence. Geez

Pass the salt.
 

ThisEndUp

mort à l'entente

bruins70

New member
Aug 19, 2008
134
1
0
My God you're an illiterate boob- when you learn how to fucking spell at something higher than a Fourth Grade level we MIGHT gibe your blatherings a little more credence. (Might but not likely.)

OK you education challenged idiot:

Are we debttaing there personal lives or the evidence they present?
Are we DEBATING THEIR personal lives or the evidence they present?

(Side note: What evidence? They just claim it never happened and you, you sad little racist just lap it right up. Man you are living proof of the typical Truther being a slackjawed, mouth breathing, uneducated, redneck imbecile.)

Shall we continue with your brilliance? You want us to believe your tripe but you can't string two sentences together without help:
 

ThisEndUp

mort à l'entente
Are we debttaing there personal lives or the evidence they present?

Discredit the message, not the messenger......
troothers, holocaust deniers, anti-semites, survivalists, white supremists

what great bedfellows :rolleyes:
 

zaig

Active member
Nov 21, 2003
283
32
28
I really don't think there is any left to say. silky has confirmed exactly what he is,( not that we didn't already know). I played along for fun, but fun time is over.

Look at it this way folks, in real life, not internet chatter, you wouldn't give this person the time of day. I think I will take my own advise for the time being and not give him the time of day.

Please pass the salt.
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,645
828
113
Again debate the evidence not there personal lives.

My main source of info is Alex Jones. all those people I have rarely heard of except for Icke.

Alex isn't a white supremacist, holocaust denier, anti semite, and whats wrong with being a survivalist? Having stored food is a bad idea? Especially if its non GMO.
So you are more of a lemming then a sheep ? At least sheep have the sense to scatter when things go wrong, lemmings, right off the cliff together. What the hell is Alex Jones an expert on anyway when it comes to anything relating to 9/11 ? He obviously knows how to gather the loonies under one roof, but what about real life ?
 

ThisEndUp

mort à l'entente
So you are more of a lemming then a sheep ? At least sheep have the sense to scatter when things go wrong, lemmings, right off the cliff together. What the hell is Alex Jones an expert on anyway when it comes to anything relating to 9/11 ? He obviously knows how to gather the loonies under one roof, but what about real life ?
and what a group of loonies they are:

troothers
survivalist
anti-semites
holocaust deniers
white supremists
nazi's
skinheads

need we say anything else?
 

zaig

Active member
Nov 21, 2003
283
32
28
and what a group of loonies they are:

troothers
survivalist
anti-semites
holocaust deniers
white supremists
nazi's
skinheads

need we say anything else?
I don't think so.

Thread closed to anyone with an IQ of more than their shoe size.
 

bruins70

New member
Aug 19, 2008
134
1
0
Agreed, I will no longer encourage an anti-semite to spread his drivel.
And Lighthead? Go back and read my post re: CAN not opposed to WILL not debate your nonsense, I'm not giving up- along with can't be bothered to debate your tripe, I refuse to give an anti-semite a platform.
 

HankQuinlan

I dont re Member
Sep 7, 2002
1,743
6
0
victoria
I know what you mean. You CANNOT because you will have to admit a controlled demo and 9/11 looked the same.

How am I anti semetic? Do you even know where the word HOLOCAUST comes from, what it means?
He assumed you were anti-semitic because you agreed earlier in this thread that Ernst Zundel and other holocaust deniers were legitimate. I could give you the benefit of the doubt that didn't know who they were and just automatically agreed, assuming they were truthers....because you don't really read anything, you just see a phrase and post away --- usually links to videos. On the other hand, the conspiracy theorists do have a tendency to assume Jews are part of the plot.

Do you have a special definition of "holocaust" too that the rest of us are not privy to? Other than simply "consumed by fire" or the more common one with the capital H referring to the acts of the Third Reich?

And... judging by the posts on Alex Jones' site, he has a lot of followers that belong to the above list. I believe you can judge people by the company they keep.
 

HankQuinlan

I dont re Member
Sep 7, 2002
1,743
6
0
victoria
Legit as in there science to 9/11. Them being anti-semetic or not has to do wither there personal lives. Has nothing to do with one another.

Yes holocaust means "burnt offering" or a sacrifice. Sacrifice to who? Swastika is a sun symbol flipped over, backwards. Light vs dark, good vs evil. Occultic stuff. Just saying.
Just wow. (backs slowly away)
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,645
828
113
He knows more than you. That's your problem. You don't have to be an expert to interview, experts, scientists, firemen, police etc.

Not to mention he called it 2 months before it happened.

German defense minister Andreas von Bulow. I assure you he is a real human being, he does exist.... Let me guess he doesn't measure up to your standards as an expert.
http://video.google.ca/videosearch?...=N&tab=wv#q=andreas+von+bulow+911&hl=en&emb=0
He knows more then me about what, his distorted view of 9/11 ? You are right, you don't have to be an expert to interview experts, etc., in fact all you have to do is be expert enough to only interview, or at least air only those interviews that give even the tiniest bit of credibility to your point of view.

As to Defense Minister von Bulow, he isn't the Defense Minister and hasn't been in Government since 1994. In his book, In Namen des Staates, he implied the CIA was behind 9/11, also stated, if I am correct, not once did he say, they did it. In fact he told the AFP that he believes Mossad, was behind 9/11. So if this is one of the experts Alex Jones relies on no wonder you fools are so fucked up.

You will note he was a rising star in the SPD, but he crashed and burned well before 9/11, because they finally figured out he was a nutjob.
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,645
828
113

odin

New member
Sep 9, 2009
62
0
0
Why is 911 even being debated? You had a group with the desire and know-how (Al-Qaeda) with a leader who admitted doing it (Bin Laden)? I guess having to dream up a scenario that would involve hundreds and perhaps thousands of equally evil people, with the ability to prevent all security leaks, makes some people feel like they are intelligent. Conspiracy theory believers all suffer the same problem. They need to feel like they are more intelligent than they actually are and therefore can't accept the obvious and need to find a ridiculous alternative so they can say, that unlike the majority of the world, they are too clever to be duped. For every major event that happens there is a group of morons out there dreaming up fictional scenarios. Fortunately the majority of people have more sense than these twits and the world continues to function despite them.
 

odin

New member
Sep 9, 2009
62
0
0
Bin Laden is a CIA asset. Timothy Osmond is his name. Its not a theory its a FACT. Large steel framed buildings DO NOT collapse at free fall speed. The hijackers were living at naval airforce bases, training terrorists? And 9 of these hijackers are still alive. All facts no theories.

And the majority of people believe 9/11 is an inside job, you are the minority.
Oh sorry, I forgot, you know the real truth. You're more clever than I so I guess there's no point in me pushing my obvious arguments.

Actually, nobody has realized it yet but I was the one who plotted and carried out 911. I am the only person with the desire and intelligence to do it. Remember you heard it here first.
 

odin

New member
Sep 9, 2009
62
0
0
See I post an undeniable fact like bin Laden is a CIA patsy and you just make jokes. Prove me wrong. Simple PROVE ME WRONG.

The bin Laden confession video is a fat guy whose right handed. FBI description of him is hes left handed. Plus the guy looks nothing like bin Laden.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41UAnkQARFs
Prove you're right!

Actually I just realized it that you're putting us all on and that you really don't believe any of this. Nice one :)
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,645
828
113
Well you heard what he said in the video. As to no alqaeda, thats a VERY IMPORTANT question. Theres a war being fought over them.

Now why are these british troops dressed as arabs with a car full of bombs?
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2005/200905stagedterror.htm

After they were caught by Iraqi police the Brits demanded there release. After it was denied they sent in tanks, killed a whole bunch of police. Now is that not important?
So this article you link to by Watson does not deny the existence of Al Quaeda, in fact he lumps it right in there with Iran and Syria. Unquestionably they exist. So what does this say about von Bulow's postion ? You count on both to support your bullshit, but they can't agree on something so simple or "important". As to the "rescue" of the SAS types, where in the article does it say anything about how the Brits "killed a whole bunch of police" ? Now that's important, because it shows that you are not even capable of reading and comprehending the very links you base your crap on. Even the headline ends with a question mark, which just goes to prove that the author wasn't sure of his "facts". Let's face it the story as written is much more sensational then, oops we had a failure to communicate.
 

myselftheother

rubatugtug
Dec 2, 2004
1,274
14
38
vancouver
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=972
They used tanks to smash through prison walls. I'm pretty sure they killed some.

AlQaeda does exist. But they are run by CIA, MI6 Moussad. Not some angry muslims hiding in caves and under your bed.
Being 'pretty sure' isn't being factual. You actually have to be factual, hard evidence as hard as the smoking gun, the body and the prints.

BTW...didn't you just say Al Qaeda didn't exist? I'm pretty sure you did.
 

myselftheother

rubatugtug
Dec 2, 2004
1,274
14
38
vancouver
Alqaeda is not some group of angry muslims. Its a government run black op.

Clear enough???
They do exist, and this is old news. Al Qaeda was set up in the 90's by the Bush sr. gov't to harass and cause trouble for Saddam...this is why he chose bin Laden, a Saudi. Poor rich boy who was disappointing the family.

As with most 'black ops', bin Laden went off the reservation and started doing his own thing. After that....well, I guess by a long shot it turned out to be an inside-outside job.
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts