Correct me if I'm wrong, but I always thought GFE actually meant something. Or, is it, too, a victim of this post-modernist trend towards truth being subjective to each individual's "reality"?
Perhaps this is only a pet-peeve of mine, but I'm curious if there are other members here who are tired of how the term "GFE" just gets thrown around to the point where it's a totally meaningless marketing term.
My understanding is that GFE came into play a couple of decades ago (or less, as the film "The Girlfriend Experience" with Sasha Grey came out in 2009) to specify a different kind of service other than simply intercourse with a condom, no kissing, covered BJ and, often, no DATY. That was the standard in the 80s & 90s, largely as a reaction to the HIV crisis when "safe sex" was the norm for pros & non-pros alike. In the early 2000s, when there was more comfort & knowledge around the risks and management of HIV and other STDs, some providers ventured to offer the "girlfriend experience" and it actually meant KISSING and UNCOVERED BJ and DATY... if that holy trinity is not the standard service, then the service is NOT GFE... correct?
I wish SPs would stop with the BS like "safe GFE" or "GFE, everything covered", which are meaningless, confusing, and further evidence of the hyperinflation and narcissism that permeates social media and commercial advertising.
Just because an SP thinks she's pretty, it doesn't mean she's GFE; just because an SP was nice to you, doesn't mean you got GFE.
People make their own choices, it's fine if providers or clients want to take further precautions for their own personal comfort around the inherent risks of any intimate contact... just don't advertise something you're not offering!!!
End of rant LOL
