Do Perb members even want honest reviews?

[dare.devil]

Lots of mind reading going on here.

Selling sex for money doesn't mean everything is up for sale. Women do have a right to their body autonomy regardless of how much cash you have. So let's be realistic about respecting boundaries and not make assumptions about what money should and will get you.

People can put up whatever reviews they want. Throwing the term of 'white knight' at anything you don't like or understand is the epitome of immaturity. Maybe spend some time on your reading comprehension and understanding things before jumping on your white horse and tilting at windmills that only exist in your closed mind.

My reading comprehension is perfectly fine, and thats the reason I exactly got what you were trying to communicate.
Dont make assumption that people putting avg reviews are looking women as meat blobs and they are asking unreasonable things for money.

Dont try to be a savior and champions for them, We consider women as equal, they know what they are doing and dont need saving at all.

 

[87112]

Too much fighting that causes stress. You get accused of being a liar, fake, trouble maker when you really trying to be polite as possible saying you did not have a good time. Some of the paid advertisers will get in the mud badly. I don't deserve to be labeled which I have been accused of so I keep my opinions in DMs.

I will say 2274 and coco will just let the reviewer have their peace which I commend.

 

[Pumped]

My reading comprehension is perfectly fine, and thats the reason I exactly got what you were trying to communicate.
Dont make assumption that people putting avg reviews are looking women as meat blobs and they are asking unreasonable things for money.

Dont try to be a savior and champions for them, We consider women as equal, they know what they are doing and dont need saving at all.

Again jumping to the conclusion that you know 'what I was trying to communicate'.

Again jumping to the conclusion that I am making an assumption about reviews. People can post negative reviews, positive reviews, idiotic reviews and that's simply a reflection of their experience and how they perceive those experiences.

And gain jumping to a faulty conclusion that I'm trying to be a saviour and champion based on little reading and less comprehension and tons of mind-reading and projection.

 

[Pumped]

These are genuine questions, so please dont take them as an attack:

-Do you view yourself as superior to men who write reviews?

-Do you view yourself as superior to men who dont pay for sex?

-Do you view yourself as superior to other men in general?

-If you answer yes to any of the above, what makes you superior?

-Would you say the same things if woman were to rate mens looks or review men?

Look up 'bias' in the creation of questionnaires.

And do some research on someone you're purporting not to be attacking. That will answer most of those questions for you.

 

[dare.devil]

Again jumping to the conclusion that you know 'what I was trying to communicate'.

Again jumping to the conclusion that I am making an assumption about reviews. People can post negative reviews, positive reviews, idiotic reviews and that's simply a reflection of their experience and how they perceive those experiences.

And gain jumping to a faulty conclusion that I'm trying to be a saviour and champion based on little reading and less comprehension and tons of mind-reading and projection.

I already mentioned that, I agreed on rest of the content of your comment except those two, even found those unecessary in the context of this thread.

Ok may be I am assuming too much, If you care to explain what was your point of making those two with "some of us" and "unrealistic expectations of men for money", if it helps may be you can direct me to those occurences where you found such.

 

[Noob888]

People can put up whatever reviews they want. Throwing the term of 'white knight' at anything you don't like or understand is the epitome of immaturity. Maybe spend some time on your reading comprehension and understanding things before jumping on your white horse and tilting at windmills that only exist in your closed mind.

Hmm. Someone just called @Forum mod immature?: https://perb.cc/xenforo/threads/bashing-on-negative-reviews.341057/#post-2475209

 

[masterpoonhunter]

My god the overthinking here is ... well its overthinking.

YES this perbite wants reviews. I can decide if its valid or not and I can take what I need from what the poster writes.

On the whole topic of reviews, what is written in all these hallowed pages has saved this guy a lot of money and a lot of grief and has resulted in some very hot lascivious times, so post reviews I say!!

 

[Banged_Up]

Oh fun! A survey! Finally something interesting in this thread!

-Do you view yourself as superior to men who write reviews?
No.

-Do you view yourself as superior to men who dont pay for sex?
No.

-Do you view yourself as superior to other men in general?
No.

-If you answer yes to any of the above, what makes you superior?
N/A

-Would you say the same things if woman were to rate mens looks or review men?
Yes, well maybe, sometimes, depends I guess.

That was not a fun survey.

 

[Pornholio]

The problem with “lounge” threads is sometimes it gets heated and personalized in weird ways. I looked at one of the latest locked threads and in it were about 5 people who were/are/or have been banned.It was all star lists of banned champions. Is it troll behaviour or is it just that they want to express themselves so much and the other person they are fighting (no strike through format option?) debating with that they get so caught up in the words that they say or do something to get a ban. Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one.
I try to avoid certain threads started by certain people, I just wait until it’s locked and grab my 🍿. It’s too bad as the mods give us enough leash for awhile, but then the personal attacks on each other happens and it gets locked. 🔒

 

[maniacalone]

The problem with “lounge” threads is sometimes it gets heated and personalized in weird ways. I looked at one of the latest locked threads and in it were about 5 people who were/are/or have been banned.It was all star lists of banned champions. Is it troll behaviour or is it just that they want to express themselves so much and the other person they are fighting (no strike through format option?) debating with that they get so caught up in the words that they say or do something to get a ban. Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one.
I try to avoid certain threads started by certain people, I just wait until it’s locked and grab my 🍿. It’s too bad as the mods give us enough leash for awhile, but then the personal attacks on each other happens and it gets locked. 🔒

It could possibly be the same guy with several user handles and numerous vpn programs at his disposal.

 

[AMG-GTR]

I get a lot of shit for my reviews sometimes. This is a subjective business. I’m aware that this board makes its money from the providers so they’re going to always take the side of the hand that feeds them. I get it.

Sometimes I disagree with my own reviews because I was blasted when I went to visit or I was working 18 hour days for 10 days in a row.

I try to provide reviews to be helpful to those that don’t have money to burn.

 

[rizzgod]

I believe that most members of this community are open-minded and value honest reviews, and therefore are likely to accept them without issue, whether actively endorsing them or simply maintaining a neutral stance.
I can also speak from experience that alot of guys simply share information on providers in the DM's due to harassment from both providers and other members.

I've also seen instances where individuals post glowing public reviews about a provider, only to share a starkly different, often negative experience with me in private messages, warning me to be cautious or sharing unflattering anecdotes about their dealings with the same provider.

have taken a lot of heat for my reviews in the past, even though I have made them as respectful as possible, while still trying to maintain honesty. I would also guess that my reviews are more useful for the men on here who have high standards, are more experienced with woman, and don't fall in love with any girl who is nice to them for once.

To those who criticize men for writing honest reviews, I want to address the elephant in the room. It's clear that your emotions are deeply invested in the subject matter, and you're likely experiencing feelings of rejection or inadequacy due to the lack of attention from the women you're writing about, as well as woman in your personal lives. Your defence of these providers online is likely driven by a desire to feel significant, as the fleeting validation from an online debate becomes a substitute for genuine connection and affection. I'm sorry, but there is no way you can have a healthy sex life or a healthy relationship with women if this is how you act. There's a reason people don't respect white knights, and we all know you are ugly on the inside and out, and woman are repulsed by you.

 

[Banged_Up]

There are people that couldn’t get a dog to play with them if they tied a pork chop around their necks. Some of those people reside here.
Moderators can be a pain in the ass in other forums, they are a necessity in a cesspool of this nature.
Tommy boy gets a taste of Mary Jane’s coochie and next thing you know he’s a white knight willing to die on the hill of her defence.
One problem is there are trolls and wanna be tough guys that are happy to occupy their time trying to get under Tommy’s skin.
Both couldn’t get pussy unless it was left to them in a will. So here we are. The bullied and the bully have an anonymous playground. The woke, the painfully oblivious and the downright stupid are given enough rope to hang themselves and they often do (perbatory). It’s not a perfect setup but it’s pretty good. I’ve had experiences where I have attached my feelings to a review. It’s a sex worker review board for perverts. I give it the same weight as I do a pig rolling in the mud. Looks fun pig, you enjoy that. I’m gonna stay on my side of the fence and watch.
My tv remote has an imaginary “ignore” button on it for my wife.
I installed a custom one on my keyboard just for Perb. It works great. Never having to hear any virtue signalling “my guy” people = priceless…

 

[Forum mod]

Does anyone else notice how white knighting moves seem to be almost exclusively made by guys who can only afford massage parlors?

Does anyone else notice that the trolls who are making this forum difficult for lots of people tend to be the same 3 or 4 guys, banned over and over who cannot either take the hint or smarten up and learn to get along with others? They denigrate women they see and think anyone who writes a good review is a simp. We have had quite enough of them here.

 

[piss]

Reviews are personal opinions. Que the cliche about opinions...

Studies show that even when five people watch a horrific car accident from start to end, there will be five different accounts of what happened, and they actually experienced it first hand. The way I take positive reviews is that it means their is a chance the girl isn't a total waste of time. The baseline from which we all interpret our own personal experiences stems from how we see the world, but how we present ourselves to others also pings them from how they perceive the world. The first thing I think to myself when I read a bad review is "what motivation could there be?". For all I know, the dude that didn't get the bbbj has a case of head cheese. The guy that didn't get the nipple licking smells like he's hiding month old BO with patchouli.

And people that get upset about either need to take their Id out for a coffee and introduce it to their ego.

 

[dare.devil]

Reviews are personal opinions. Que the cliche about opinions...

Studies show that even when five people watch a horrific car accident from start to end, there will be five different accounts of what happened, and they actually experienced it first hand. The way I take positive reviews is that it means their is a chance the girl isn't a total waste of time. The baseline from which we all interpret our own personal experiences stems from how we see the world, but how we present ourselves to others also pings them from how they perceive the world. The first thing I think to myself when I read a bad review is "what motivation could there be?". For all I know, the dude that didn't get the bbbj has a case of head cheese. The guy that didn't get the nipple licking smells like he's hiding month old BO with patchouli.

And people who get upset about either need to take their Id out for a coffee and introduce it to their ego.

Thanks, man, I believe it's a general approach from all Perb members.
Just notice, it's not only you, but a general sentiment, the obvious bias that good reviews are good without motivation and bad ones are with bad motivation. Number one reason for not posting on bad experience as it needs justification, judged with bad intentions etc.

There are bad apples on both sides, negative ones were used for vendetta and positive ones for favours, but in general, I don't like stereotyping.
I believe both should be taken with a neutral mindset and open for interpretation by the readers.

 

[bruce.pepper]

I don't get why people insist that looks are entirely subjective. While it's true that personal tastes play a role, scientific studies have shown that physical attractiveness is largely based on universal standards and not entirely subjective. There's a significant body of research demonstrating that certain facial features, body proportions, and other physical characteristics are universally considered attractive or unattractive.

Additionally, there are numerous studies where strangers rate each other's attractiveness on a scale, and the results show that people tend to agree on a person's physical appeal. Interestingly, research has found that women tend to be harsher critics of men's physical appearance, ranking them lower than men do when evaluating women's looks.

Additionally,
Guys on here will often argue about objective facts, like when a girl is clearly older than her claimed age or when photos are heavily edited. They'll claim that it doesn't matter or that it's not a big deal, or that its not true when it clearly is. Similarly, if a girl is noticeably overweight, some guys will downplay it or say she's 'slim thick'.

 

[SolidSnake]

One new spin is that the girl looks better than her stolen pictures.

Guys on here will often argue about objective facts, like when a girl is clearly older than her claimed age or when photos are heavily edited. They'll claim that it doesn't matter or that it's not a big deal, or that its not true when it clearly is. Similarly, if a girl is noticeably overweight, some guys will downplay it or say she's 'slim thick'.

 

[piss]

I don't get why people insist that looks are entirely subjective. While it's true that personal tastes play a role, scientific studies have shown that physical attractiveness is largely based on universal standards and not entirely subjective. There's a significant body of research demonstrating that certain facial features, body proportions, and other physical characteristics are universally considered attractive or unattractive.

Because they ARE entirely subjective. Just because some people agree on some features, it doesn't mean that all the features add up to the whole of one that is attractive enough to spend an hour with. If it were so simple, your buddy would have married someone YOU think is hot when in reality you wouldn't fuck her with your English teacher's cock. And what people find "attractive" vs. what kind of look they're going for sexually are completely unrelated.

Guys on here will often argue about objective facts, like when a girl is clearly older than her claimed age or when photos are heavily edited. They'll claim that it doesn't matter or that it's not a big deal, or that its not true when it clearly is. Similarly, if a girl is noticeably overweight, some guys will downplay it or say she's 'slim thick'.

It's not "fact" when someone is giving their opinion on whether or not someone looks older or younger. It's an opinion, and the fact is something no one will know (her actual age) unless she reveals it personally. I know 50 year old women that have most guys thinking they're 30 because they look 30. Same goes for the "overweight" vs. "slim/thick" point. One man's perfect dimensions and another man's "nope" and they walk.

Such an odd position to take, dictating what people should find attractive based on averages and studies. There are so many women I don't give a second look to that others will step on their dick to try and get them in bed.

 

[BoaChoi]

is noticeably overweight, some guys will downplay it or say she's 'slim thick'.

funny story I have to tell. One time I was on a weight loss journey, I weighed about 240lbs at the time. I book with a massage provider, she looked much much larger than her photos when I arrived. beforehand I had asked for the bodyslide add on. When we were doing the bodyslide, the massage table broke (we were both okay, its broke slowly). afterwards we examined it and found out the maximum weight capacity of the massage table was 450lbs.

Despite being asian, im not the best at math, but according to my math that makes her around 210lbs. She was listed at 140lbs on the next place she worked website, but now the website no longer lists her weight.

I have seen guys get very mad at others calling her chubb chubb on here!! but 210lbs for a woman her height is very chubb chubb. I actually weigh around 210-220 now, and im fatso .