In the context of the questions you posted leading up to this one, shows clearly how little you know about the rest of the world and how life is for those who live in foreign places. This is why when you post on this subject matter, it is yet more evidence of how characteriscally you speak from being "all knowing" but actually know nothing from personal experience and observation. All your so-called knowledge you draw from your desk and your understanding of the world, which seems strictly provincial (and not in the political sense of the word).
The reason you think it is sufficient to only ask if someone is exploited in this or that situation, to get your point across, is because your point of reference is limited to your life here. You assume that life elsewhere, despite some obvious differences in living standards, is just like here. You assume that people think the same way and make choices like people would make choices here. In fact, your world view is so limited, you cannot conceive what it means to have a different life.
So your question is the wrong question because your understanding only brings you to questions that never step outside of your own limited frame of reference. You have no idea what exploitation is. You might know what "equality" is, but your understanding of that is limited to the context of this environment. And if you knew what equality truly was, then you would know what it means to be exploited.
So to be kind to you, I'll entertain your silly question because I am sure you feel an indignant right to it. No, I don't think the McDonald's employee is exploited - and the reason is because he got there in Canada (I presume) because he made choices in an environment where everyone pretty much has the same equal access to choices. He chose a path that led him to be a slave for McDonald's and will live an austere lifestyle as a result. He does not deserve anything more than what was the result of his choices - and he should have known better if he wanted a better life.
