Just wondering if having a 411 or reviews section for sugar babies is a thing. I joined a site recently out of curiosity and I've seen a couple of ladies on there who are also active on LL, and pretty much offering the same thing. Noticed other ladies on there too who don't advertise on LL, who in essence are doing sex work, should there be a separate section for sugar Baby arrangements?
Sugar Babies/Daddies Review and 411 section?
- Thread starter lukom
- Start date
If they are advertising on LL, go ahead and review them in that context. If they are strictly a sugar baby, reviews are not allowed, they are non-pros, even though they may act like it.
Escorts aren't supposed to be using sugar sites. it's against the terms of Seekings service, so someone could probably report them. That said, there definitely are a few who are active on both sides.
As far as reviewing civilians/under-the-radar/etc , no I don't think that's really a good idea - we might as well start reviewing Tinder hookups too then
I'd agree with you, but tinder is intended strictly to be just a hookup site. Where sugar Baby sites are for pay per meet, most of whom seem to be soliciting for sexual services or are agreeing to that sort of arrangementEscorts aren't supposed to be using sugar sites. it's against the terms of Seekings service, so someone could probably report them. That said, there definitely are a few who are active on both sides.
As far as reviewing civilians/under-the-radar/etc , no I don't think that's really a good idea - we might as well start reviewing Tinder hookups too then
I'm not sure, there's quite a mix, a lot are looking for platonic/findom/virtual, while most seem to be looking for something ongoing, and there are definitely some looking for short-term (which would be PPM).
I've definitely met (or talked with in the case of the virtual girls) all three types. I generally try to avoid the pros on these sites for several reasons. No judgment, but if I wanted to see a girl who's banging a dozen random guys a week, I'd stick to escorts
Which sugar sites are you using?
Sometimes i can't tell if females live in reality or fairy tale land. I guess they have until about 30 to 35 years of age before they come down to earth.
It sounds more fun to court a lady in my civilian life. At least if I am rejected or it doesn't work out, I get a straight forward response most of the time.
I'm using Sugar Daddy, and I'm new at it, never knew how the whole thing works. The women on there are various ages, not just young girls. Many over 30, and I'm fine with that. I don't engage these girls, they mostly engage me and I tell them bluntly what I'm looking for and If they're game we continue chatting. So far I've met a couple of ladies, both of whom are over 30. I'm going to try and see them in the coming weeks.I'm not sure, there's quite a mix, a lot are looking for platonic/findom/virtual, while most seem to be looking for something ongoing, and there are definitely some looking for short-term (which would be PPM).
I've definitely met (or talked with in the case of the virtual girls) all three types. I generally try to avoid the pros on these sites for several reasons. No judgment, but if I wanted to see a girl who's banging a dozen random guys a week, I'd stick to escorts
Which sugar sites are you using?
Last edited:
Thanks for all the input gentlemen. I appreciate it. I have thought about the idea of sugar daddy/baby idea, but have not done it. Seems like a lot of work. Sounds like might be better to see an SP. I did sign up one, but didn’t really put much on profile/pic, so didn’t really get any messages.
In my experience, 37 is the magic number where most women get it.
Good for a few years then its a crap shoot and based on a multitude of things will go this way or that way.
I don't know about that, the word Karen is directed to a particular age group of women.
That depends. So far the gist I'm seeing is SP's on these sites are offering to do the same thing, but longer hours for less than on Tryst or Leolist (for example), while other ladies who haven't been jaded by hobbyists and the bullshit from some creeps are also offering to host for as little as $300 for a few hours and going to the bedroom from there. This doesn't make us immune to scams or pimps though.
I can assure u those are few and far between. Maybe the older women in the 35+ age group are willing to accept such offers but I'm not interested in older women. Divorceddad summed it up pretty well. That's been my experience as well and I've been on SA for years now. Things have changed over the years and it ain't for the better.
There are some ATF escorts I would love to have a sugar daddy relationship with. But first I have to find and marry some filthy rich woman so I can have the resources to afford one.
PPM—parts per million? PPM is not listed as a recognized acronym on Perb: https://perb.cc/xenforo/threads/escort-abbreviations-acronyms-terminology-used-on-ads.223932/
And here I thought it meant Pesos Per Minute 🤦🏻♂️
I don't know that one, but have you tried Seeking (which used to be called SeekingAss back in the early-2000s)? which probably has the most members?
it also depends on the time of year, I saw one stats that said the times you see most interest are when school starts/ends and Nov/Dec. I would have thought Jan would be busy too, but the ladies already paid their bills off - I hope
https://www.sugardaddysuccess.com/sugardaddy-tips-for-2020/
I know a few guys using SugarDaddyMeet, it's cheaper than Seeking, but they let you be more direct in your conversations. Seeking will ban guys if they talk money on the site.
Personally, I've had the most luck with girls in their mid-20s; they're more mature than the 18-20s but are still at the point they haven't settled into the rat race
Maybe DiCaprio is on to something?
Last edited:
