You need a better fitting tinfoil hatI wonder if this operation had anything to do with the mega Swan Lake thread suddenly going dark?!
You need a better fitting tinfoil hatI wonder if this operation had anything to do with the mega Swan Lake thread suddenly going dark?!
Richmond is full of these groups, which is who Kash panders to.Wasn't there a bit of a vigorously posted thread not long ago about a Richmond apartment building where the building Karens were self policing the place? Could that have something to do with this? Some kind of self righteous group of citizens raising shit with the police?
Sorry but most of this is completely wrong. Undercover police do not have to identify themselves if asked. Based on the stings that have happened previously, all you need to do is communicate with them to arrange the meeting and arrive in the incall set up where a female undercover is present and once you start talking about the session it's over and they bust you. Suffice to say, do not get your legal advice on an escort review board, consult a lawyer.So, as a learning thing, you can only be charged if the police can prove you showed up with the irrefutable intent to purchase sex acts and that the burden of proof is quite high requiring first-hand observation / interaction and not hear-say allegations.
In other words, the police standing outside one of the known condo buildings means they can't prove intent. Standing outside one of the SPs units inside the condo building is not good enough to prove intent.
Really what needs to happen is for a police officer to receive a request for a sex act (online, text, email), you go over to the address, enter the residence (condo, house, whatever), you pull out cash and say something incriminating like, "here is the money for that sex act we discussed" or for the undercover police officer to request the money for the sex act you two discussed.
I guess what I am seeking confirmation on is the burden of proof for police is quite high as described above. Also, it sounds like independents could be more suspect at this stage. Established agencies with established SPs should be fine unless they are compromised somehow.
I assume if the police suspect something is going on in a specific condo building AND a specific condo unit / residence, they could get a warrant? Possibly catch people in the act, but they would lack that first-hand proof that the two or more people smashing aren't doing so because they got paid.
Bonus question: I assume if you ask: "are you a cop?" they have to answer truthfully, otherwise it could be entrapment. I think entrapment is a little grey in terms of legal permeability.
I was about to post the same thing. The police have certainly been successful at curbing the demand for drugs and alcohol."Police said reducing this demand is critical to addressing the harm it can cause"
Lmao RCMP is going to stop the demand for sex work 🤣 an industry that has been around for thousands of years. Yeah, right.
Maybe focus on the TRAFFICKERS and ABUSERS?
Riza's is still advertising her ladies in Richmond so wasn't her agency. The usual Asian handlers and Perb advertisers are still offering in Richmond so wasn't them. Hard to tell but 100 clients taken in on one day means that was a lot of "confirmed bookings".So, what is the bottom line for pooners? Should they follow their dicks to Burnaby, Downtown Vancouver, and New West? Anyone know of the agencies affected in Richmond? Asking for a friend.
And given the amountof SUPPLY in Vancouver it’s such a jole. AS IF"Police said reducing this demand is critical to addressing the harm it can cause"
Lmao RCMP is going to stop the demand for sex work 🤣 an industry that has been around for thousands of years. Yeah, right.
Maybe focus on the TRAFFICKERS and ABUSERS?
I’m all for decriminalizing but not for legalizing.Just make it LEGAL FFS. It’s the oldest profession in the book. Sheesh. That would be the BEST way to enforce safety standards and drive out traffickers.
Maybe there's a middle ground somewhere between legalizing and regulation. There are personal services industries that are legalized but not heavily regulated and they seem to be doing just fine. The important thing imo is having the ability to get help when needed. Nothing else really needs to be "regulated" or under union.I’m all for decriminalizing but not for legalizing.
Check out all the countries that have legalized prostitution and the quality of life of the sex workers there. No thank you. I want to work out of my home with my rules. I do not want to be regulated or forced into a red light district. Legalizing also makes criminals out of survival sex workers as they might not be able to pay for licensing and all the other things that might be involved in a legal business.
But decriminalizing, yes please. Just take your laws off my body. Period.
There are already laws around abuse and trafficking. Legalizing it, I don’t think would make much of a difference in how shady, manipulative evil people operate.
Huh ?? 😳I'd rather they focus their efforts in stopping and arresting the black pimps from Ontario and Quebec sending their trafficked girls here.





