Just to get clarification on this: We can no longer discuss the news reports of stings where the targets of those stings were allegedly "willing" to engage with "underage providers"? Because in my opinion, this was a rather important news event as it pertains to this forum and it's membership.Effective immediately any discussion of underage providers or stings related to underage girls will be covered by the same rule as BBFS discussion or STD discussion.
Just to get clarification on this: We can no longer discuss the news reports of stings where the targets of those stings were allegedly "willing" to engage with "underage providers"? Because in my opinion, this was a rather important news event as it pertains to this forum and it's membership.
Posting links to news stories will be considered warning the perverts of stings and will lead to infractions and banning as stated by Forum Mod. Zero tolerance!Man mountain, I believe the topic in its entirety is now no go. The reason being that someone who is a predator could get a warning from a thread made about it in future. Perb doesn't wanna warn away the creepy types. Predators also did the same on craigslist, they woulf warn their kind that To Catch a Predator was in town and to be wary.
I'm not sure how linking to general news stories that are already public, constitute a warning to anyone?Posting links to news stories will be considered warning the perverts of stings and will lead to infractions and banning as stated by Forum Mod. Zero tolerance!
No you’re advertising a potential underage provider, you can say you walked away.Can pooners write about walking away from LL ads if they show up and think they are too young? Or is that against the rules?
No. You’re advertising a potential underage provider. You can say, you walked away.No you’re advertising a potential underage provider, you can say you walked away.





