Important change to the rules!

MB Mod

Moderator
Sep 17, 2017
3,400
16,016
113
Effective immediately any discussion of underage providers or stings related to underage girls will be covered by the same rule as BBFS discussion or STD discussion.
 

Forum mod

Moderator
Jan 1, 2018
3,142
16,311
113
If anyone reading this board is stupid enough to knowingly go see an underage provider, please know you deserve the arrest, the public shaming and the charges you have coming to you. PERB will not help you avoid these, only common sense, decency and having a brain will suffice. The answer is simple, you are told or suspect a provider is underage, the answer is: "no! I am in no way interested in seeing an underage provider". Posting sting warnings will lead to immediate infractions and bans, as will notifications of suspected or actual underage ads. This will be zero tolerance.
 

Man Mountain

Too Old To Die Young
Oct 29, 2006
3,849
30
0
Vancouver
Effective immediately any discussion of underage providers or stings related to underage girls will be covered by the same rule as BBFS discussion or STD discussion.
Just to get clarification on this: We can no longer discuss the news reports of stings where the targets of those stings were allegedly "willing" to engage with "underage providers"? Because in my opinion, this was a rather important news event as it pertains to this forum and it's membership.
 
Last edited:

jamasianman

Well-known member
Dec 5, 2015
1,477
330
83
Man mountain, I believe the topic in its entirety is now no go. The reason being that someone who is a predator could get a warning from a thread made about it in future. Perb doesn't wanna warn away the creepy types. Predators also did the same on craigslist, they woulf warn their kind that To Catch a Predator was in town and to be wary.
 

MB Mod

Moderator
Sep 17, 2017
3,400
16,016
113
Just to get clarification on this: We can no longer discuss the news reports of stings where the targets of those stings were allegedly "willing" to engage with "underage providers"? Because in my opinion, this was a rather important news event as it pertains to this forum and it's membership.
Man mountain, I believe the topic in its entirety is now no go. The reason being that someone who is a predator could get a warning from a thread made about it in future. Perb doesn't wanna warn away the creepy types. Predators also did the same on craigslist, they woulf warn their kind that To Catch a Predator was in town and to be wary.
Posting links to news stories will be considered warning the perverts of stings and will lead to infractions and banning as stated by Forum Mod. Zero tolerance!
 

Cock Throppled

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
5,110
1,076
113
Upstairs
Posting links to news stories will be considered warning the perverts of stings and will lead to infractions and banning as stated by Forum Mod. Zero tolerance!
I'm not sure how linking to general news stories that are already public, constitute a warning to anyone?

It would seem it's more a way for members on this site to show our disgust.
 

SkinnyJohn

Active member
May 13, 2014
289
50
28
Can pooners write about walking away from LL ads if they show up and think they are too young? Or is that against the rules?
 

MB Mod

Moderator
Sep 17, 2017
3,400
16,016
113
Can pooners write about walking away from LL ads if they show up and think they are too young? Or is that against the rules?
No you’re advertising a potential underage provider, you can say you walked away.
 

jgg

In the air again.
Apr 14, 2015
2,817
1,054
113
Varies now
No you’re advertising a potential underage provider, you can say you walked away.
No. You’re advertising a potential underage provider. You can say, you walked away.

Fixed it for you.
 
Vancouver Escorts