HST - how are you planning to vote?

frisky69

New member
Oct 3, 2006
23
0
0
Lower Mainland
Some of you may remember going to a store to buy clothing for children and have to fill out a bunch of information to not pay PST. Well here is the relevant piece of legislation: "Clothing and footwear for children under the age of 15 years. See Bulletin SST 009, Children's Clothing". What we end up with however is people pretending to buy clothes for children under 15 and people saying that their kid(s) are growing so fast they have to wear adult clothing while trying to maintain a straight face.

Who the f*ck cares? No matter what system is implemented, someone's gonna find a way to cheat it.
It's expensive enought to raise a family, it is asinine to tax children's clothing.
 

Cock Throppled

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
5,219
1,227
113
Upstairs
Since all services are now HST-applicable I think all the avid HST supporters here should do the honourable thing and add the HST to all sexual services they receive (before adding a tip, of course).

After all, isn't the whole objective to help the BC economy?

PS - in an article supporting the HST in The Sun Stockwell Day said the HST was a provincial initiative, which I took to mean the Province approached Ottawa to implement it.

If true, the claim they had no idea before the election of bringing in the HST has been confirmed a lie by a federal Cabinet Minister, even though provincial documents pretty well confirmed it earlier.
 

FunSugarDaddy

New member
Aug 15, 2008
1,110
5
0
Obviously, if the PST is ever re-introduced one would hope they could greatly simpify it. I can't for the life of me figure out why they have so many arcane rules and why they were ever necessary to begin with, just slap the PST on everything and the revenue will be higher it and will be simplier to administer, which is basically what they did when they introduced the HST.




Just a quick example to show you the seemingly random and confusing aspects of the PST. The following applies to optical retailers.

Taxable items:

* Accessories, optical - sold or charged separately from prescription optical goods
* Cases - sold or charged separately from prescription optical goods
* Chains - sold or charged separately from prescription optical goods
* Cleaning solutions - for lenses and frames
* Clip-on sunglasses - sold or charged separately from prescription glasses
* Contact lens preparations or solutions
* Contact lenses, non-prescription
* Eye drops - for lubricating or re-wetting contact lenses
* Frames - sold or charged separately from prescription optical goods
* Lens wipes
* Reading glasses, non-prescription
* Re-wetting drops - for lubricating and rewetting soft contact lenses
* Sunglasses, non-prescription

Non-taxable items:

* Anaesthetics
* Accessories, optical (e.g. chains or cases) - sold with prescription optical goods for a single price
* Cases - sold with prescription optical goods for a single price
* Chains - sold with prescription optical goods for a single price
* Clip-on sunglasses - sold with prescription glasses for a single price
* Contact lenses and sample disposable contact lenses, prescription
* Drugs and medicines, prescription
* Eye drops (e.g. Murine or Visine) - made for treating, relieving or preventing an eye disease or ailment
* Eye pads, preparations
* Frames - sold with prescription glasses/lenses
* Glasses, prescription
* Lenses, prescription
* Punctal plugs, permanent
* Repairs - to prescription optical goods

Confused? Bear in mind they have many lists like these, imagine the amount of effort required just to set up your cash register. Imagine going to buy a pair of prescription glasses but you forgot to buy the case. You go back a day later to buy the case, now you have to pay PST whereas there would have been no PST had you bought it with the glasses although that only applies if the case is sold with the glasses for a single price.

Prescription contact lenses are non-taxable but the eye drops to lubricate them are. Is that fair? You can create numerous combination that makes no sense just from those lists.

Another example I gave earlier regarding school supplies - namely bags. From the PST legislation: "Bags specifically designed to carry school books and supplies (does not include briefcases, attaché cases, roll bags, backpacks, sport bags or tote bags)" are non-taxable but they don't tell you what bags qualifies.

Some of you may remember going to a store to buy clothing for children and have to fill out a bunch of information to not pay PST. Well here is the relevant piece of legislation: "Clothing and footwear for children under the age of 15 years. See Bulletin SST 009, Children's Clothing". What we end up with however is people pretending to buy clothes for children under 15 and people saying that their kid(s) are growing so fast they have to wear adult clothing while trying to maintain a straight face.
 

Cock Throppled

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
5,219
1,227
113
Upstairs
Just like the health care argument is always framed as a "US system or our system" - it doesn't have to be.
Eliminating the HST doesn't mean we have to go back to the PST/GST system we had before. Modifications can be made to simplify, adjust and make it more workable and acceptable and less onerous.

And that's done by consulting with the people, not ramming something up our asses in the dark of night.
 

wilde

Sinnear Member
Jun 4, 2003
3,040
44
48
Since all services are now HST-applicable I think all the avid HST supporters here should do the honourable thing and add the HST to all sexual services they receive (before adding a tip, of course).
I would gladly pay it as long as the SP can show me her HST registration number so I know that she won't be pocketing it instead.
 

Cock Throppled

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
5,219
1,227
113
Upstairs
You mean the way businesses are saving all that money but not passing on lower prices to consumers?
 

wilde

Sinnear Member
Jun 4, 2003
3,040
44
48
Just like the health care argument is always framed as a "US system or our system" - it doesn't have to be.
Eliminating the HST doesn't mean we have to go back to the PST/GST system we had before. Modifications can be made to simplify, adjust and make it more workable and acceptable and less onerous.

And that's done by consulting with the people, not ramming something up our asses in the dark of night.
If they had consulted the people, properly explained the benefits of the HST, pointed out the many flaws of the PST and brought in the HST at 10%, would that have made any difference to you?
 

wilde

Sinnear Member
Jun 4, 2003
3,040
44
48
You mean the way businesses are saving all that money but not passing on lower prices to consumers?
No it means I don't beleive the SP industry is very tax compliant.

Businesses have spent a lot of money implementing the HST which tends to wipe out those savings for the time being.
 

chilli

Member
Jul 25, 2005
993
12
18
Haven't got mine in the mail yet but I'll be putting a big fat X in the NO section as well. :clap2::thumb:
You seriously can't afford another $240.00 per year to do the right thing and vote yes to getting rid of this pos?

An extra $240.00 out of your pocket a year to send the Liberals a clear message.

There's a good reason why the Liberals have to rebuild their party nationally.

Their lying to us, and I for one (like many others) will pay the extra $240.00 per year and stand up for my beliefs about the kind of politicians I support.

Too bad people like you are weak.

And about that video link you posted Rancid - the guy (and obviously you too) completely misses the mark about why people don't support the HST. It's not about money. It's not about Gordon Campbell.

It's about what we as a society are willing to tolerate from our politicians.

And most people (thank god) understand the correlation and are willing to send a clear message to the Liberal party.
 

vancity_cowboy

hard riding member
Jan 27, 2008
5,486
8
38
on yer ignore list
couple of creeps on the street corner this morning yapping about getting rid of the HST '...so that money would be put back into the system where it belongs...'

????WTF???? :confused: :doh:
 

FunSugarDaddy

New member
Aug 15, 2008
1,110
5
0
You're an idiot.

This shouldn't be a political vote, you have elections for that, and if you want to vote the liberals out of power be my guest, but there's millions of dollars at sake here, perhaps far more, considering the federal government gave the province 1.8B as a reward for implementing the HST. I'm sure that's something that would have to get paid back of the HST is eliminated.

Add to that the fact that a significant amount of the Ministry of Finance is peared down, as a result of not having to collect the PST, and will now have to be reinstated if the HST goes down in flames, on top of that, the business community also spent a pile of money switching their bookkeeping systems and cash registers over, and the mere thought of changing all this simply to make a point, is pathetic.

You seriously can't afford another $240.00 per year to do the right thing and vote yes to getting rid of this pos?

An extra $240.00 out of your pocket a year to send the Liberals a clear message.

There's a good reason why the Liberals have to rebuild their party nationally.

Their lying to us, and I for one (like many others) will pay the extra $240.00 per year and stand up for my beliefs about the kind of politicians I support.

Too bad people like you are weak.

And about that video link you posted Rancid - the guy (and obviously you too) completely misses the mark about why people don't support the HST. It's not about money. It's not about Gordon Campbell.

It's about what we as a society are willing to tolerate from our politicians.

And most people (thank god) understand the correlation and are willing to send a clear message to the Liberal party.
 

Cock Throppled

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
5,219
1,227
113
Upstairs
"Wrecking the economy" is typical of the over the top hyperbole the pro HST side is making. Getting rid of the HST will no more hurt the economy than having the PST/GST did.

How did BC become such a top destination for investment all the years the HST didn't exist? Saying the elimination of the HST will stop investment is idiotic.

Businesses found the money to switch to the HST, so, with a year of savings it should be no problem to find money to switch back.

I have to laugh at the film industry saying how important it is. That one industry is probably more subsidised than any other in the province. If the HST is so helpful why do they need so many government handouts?

The constant bleat from op ed pieces and ads that the HST is 10% is so blatantly deceptive and desperate it would serve them right if it backfires. I'm sure not even aznboi or wilde would have chosen that tactic.

As I've stated before the principal of lying to get into office is the bigger issue. This is the only time in our lifetimes, probably where we can tell politicians we are fed up with them using fraud to get elected and we won't tolerate it. The Liberal party lied to get elected. THEY caused the mess, THEY caused the uncertainty, THEY hammered people just coming out of a recession, THEY increased the tax, so THEY should figure out how to fix it.

Saying it isn't political is letting them off the hook. It had EVERYTHING to do with politics because they lied about the HST knowing they would never get elected if they told people the truth.

Vote "yes" to eliminate the HST and develop a better system with proper consultation. keep the HST and we're stuck with it. Eliminating it is the only way to craft a better tax structure.
 

aznboi9

Don't mind me...
May 3, 2005
1,380
3
38
Here Be Monsters
This is the only time in our lifetimes, probably where we can tell politicians we are fed up with them using fraud to get elected and we won't tolerate it.
We no longer have elections to determine our provincial representatives in government? I'm out of town for a week and everything goes to hell in a hand basket!

The Liberal party lied to get elected. THEY caused the mess, THEY caused the uncertainty, THEY hammered people just coming out of a recession, THEY increased the tax, so THEY should figure out how to fix it.
Yeah! Let's screw those guys! Who cares how it affects the entire province!

Vote "yes" to eliminate the HST and develop a better system with proper consultation. keep the HST and we're stuck with it. Eliminating it is the only way to craft a better tax structure.
Exactly! Maybe we can figure out some way of collecting the taxes more efficiently without duplicating bureacracies. Like, I don't know, maybe it would be great if only one level did the collecting... sort of like harmonizing the process... and maybe we could have the rate lowered so that we can pay less taxes. That'd be fantastic!
 

whoisjohngalt

Member
Aug 4, 2009
147
1
18
Vancouver area
We no longer have elections to determine our provincial representatives in government? I'm out of town for a week and everything goes to hell in a hand basket!

Yeah! Let's screw those guys! Who cares how it affects the entire province!

Exactly! Maybe we can figure out some way of collecting the taxes more efficiently without duplicating bureacracies. Like, I don't know, maybe it would be great if only one level did the collecting... sort of like harmonizing the process... and maybe we could have the rate lowered so that we can pay less taxes. That'd be fantastic!
Great post. At least it appears that Cock Throppled has implicitly conceded that the PST is an inferior tax that has to be replaced.

My hope now is that those who are planning to vote YES will manage to botch the ballot in some way or get lost on the way to the mailbox...
 

Pirate Code

Banned
May 18, 2011
148
0
0
The YES voters still have not come up with a way the government should tax us instead.

The only response was by Ingrid that she feels she pays enough tax already. I do too, by the way, but I also know that the with an aging population and more and more people avoiding income taxes, there is no putting my head in the sand. I choose to try to keep the lifestyle we have. I've watched the education system deteriorate so much already. I don't think it is wise to ignore the fact that it takes a lot of money to have what we have, and in order to keep it, we need to give more.
 

huggzy

Banned
May 30, 2010
616
3
18
With respect, Adriana, the time to do that is election time.
To all you people critical of Adriana's type of thinking and suggesting that this is not the time to voice their pleasure with the elected government...

HOW DO YOU DO THIS AT ELECTION TIME, WHEN ALL YOU HAVE TO MAKE YOUR VOTING DECISIONS IS THE PROMISES THE PARTIES GIVE YOU....AND THEN IT TURNS OUT THAT THE WINNING PARTY LIED TO YOU, AND GOT ELECTED IN WITH THESE LIES???

I agree with Adriana...I'm sick of governments continually, year after year, getting in on one platform, and then it turns out to be nothing but lies.

Fucking punish them. Now.

If this HST is a better tax (and I don't believe it is, and that video posted by the OP is a misleading bag of shit as well) then the government needs to do a better job of communicating this to the people and bloody well ensure it has a mandate to implement it.
 

huggzy

Banned
May 30, 2010
616
3
18
A consumption tax is actually good for the lower income bracket and particularily those who qualify for the HST rebate. And for all those against the HST, you will actually be voting YES on your ballot. I personally will be voting NO as I agree with the HST.
Not if the there are many purchases that used to be PST exempt which are now taxed at a 12% flat HST across the board amount.
 

huggzy

Banned
May 30, 2010
616
3
18
For those of you who want to get rid of the HST, do you realize that:
1) the province of BC will have to repay the federal incentives

Not true. If the HST is removed its not like everything will be reversed retroactively. Besides, the liberals should have thought of that before


2) the PST will come back and changes to past exemptions will be likely
And your point??? At least any changes they make will be far more transparent this way.

3) other taxes will be raised to make up for any shortfall
You don't know this. And what "shortfall" are you referring too??? (I thought the pro-HST arguments were that this lowered overall taxes??)

And since the Liberals didn't run on a platform of raising taxes this makes their underhanded implementation of this tax especially criminal, and they would be under intense scrutiny if they tried to raise any taxes in the absence of the HST.


4) businesses have spent considerable time and money to account for the HST which will go down the drain
Shame on the Liberals for doing this. Too bad that business tends to blindly support the liberal party...this should make then think twice about having blind faith.

5) consumption taxes have been shown to be fairer and easier on low income families
Uhhhh...not if the consumption tax being implemented costs more than the consumption tax being replaced.
 

huggzy

Banned
May 30, 2010
616
3
18
Need I remind you that the GST dropped from 7 to 5% as promised. Granted this is the provincial Liberals but to not keep this promise to reduce the HST to 10% in 2 years would be the ultimate political suicide.

Statistics have also shown that a reduction in rate does not necessarily translate to a reduction in revenue, more often than not, the revenue actually increases.
No....what the liberals did by underhandedly implementing the HST should be political suicide. If it turns out that its not, it only proves that any government can manipulate its electorate with lies, deceit, and some time to make people forget their past misdeeds.
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts