PERB In Need of Banner

Hannity, Morris Agree with “Conspiracy People” About New World Order

LightBearer

Banned
Nov 11, 2008
867
2
0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wH5YqsuZiw

Hannity, Morris Agree with “Conspiracy People” About New World Order


Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
March 31, 2009
In the video here, the former Clintonite Dick Morris, who is now a darling of Fox News, tells Sean Hannity the globalists will put the “American economy under international regulation” and “those people who have been yelling, oh, the UN is going to take over… they’ve been crazy, but now they’re right.”




Former Clintonite Dick Morris declares “those people who have been yelling, oh, the UN is going to take over… they’ve been crazy, but now they’re right.”

“Those conspiracy people,” Sean Hannity interjects, “had suggested that for years… you’re not wrong.”

It’s the “international regulation of the financial institutions” we have to worry about, warns Dick Morris. It will happen under “IMF control… Remember, the IMF is run by the Europeans and backed by Americans.”

It’s too bad Mr. Morris didn’t give us the rest of the story. The IMF is a loan sharking operation created by the bankers under the Bretton Woods scheme and its primary purpose to date has been to get third world nations into hock so they can be more effectively looted. It is now poised, as Morris eludes, to embark on a far more ambitious bankster scam — to initiate something called “global quantitative easing” by printing billions of dollars worth of a global “super-currency,” deceptively billed as a way to address the economic crisis manufactured by the global elite.

“Alistair Darling and senior figures in the US Treasury have been encouraging the Fund to issue hundreds of billions of dollars worth of so-called Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) in the coming months as part of its campaign to prevent the recession from turning into a global depression,” the Telegraph reported on March 16.

SDRs are now based on four currencies — the US dollar, the Japanese yen, the euro and the British pound. They are used largely as a unit of account by the IMF and other international organizations.

Read between the lines and you get to the bottom of the real reason for the issuance of SDRs — to push for a world currency. Recall a few days ago Zhou Xiaochuan, China’s central bank’s governor, calling for the IMF to forge a new world reserve currency.

China demands a settlement system between the SDRs and other currencies so that they can be used in international trade and financial transactions. The IMF would manage these SDRs and they would gradually replace existing reserve currencies.

As envisioned by our rulers, a world “super-currency” will ultimately require a world government. Morris blames the Europeans for this and he is only partially right — it is a scam long ago devised by international bankers primarily based in Europe and Britain and backed, as Morris admits, by the American financial elite.

The issuance of paper SDRs “would please the plutocratic international bankers” to no end, writes Robert Bradshaw, and this “move would allow them a golden opportunity to print fiat paper money in huge quantities to flood the world. We can be sure that the fat cats [the bankers] would love to have a new paper world currency in their greedy little hands. Since they already control the IMF and most world central banks, such a new global currency would definitely fit into their plans for world rule.”

It is hardly surprising that SDRs and world currency will be on the agenda at the G20 this week. The globalist George Soros has urged Obama to push the SDR agenda and has warned that if a world currency is not established and the global economy collapses (as planned) the United States “shall cease to be the dominant financial power” and “China is liable to come up ahead.” Soros is merely running a time-tested shell game in an effort to get the U.S. to pony up for what will ultimately be its demise, again as planned. China is the model to be used for our totalitarian future.

Dick Morris and the disinfo operative Sean Hannity may indeed be alarmed by this obvious push for world government. It is interesting to note that Hannity has only lately come around to the existence of the New World Order — formerly in the realm of crazy conspiracy theories — now that Obama is in the White House and the Democrats in control of Congress. Hannity and Morris are simply reading from a provided script.

Point is, the New World Order wants you to know what they have in mind for you. It tickles them to give you a preview of things to come now that the New Savior is in office and enjoying high popularity — a one world government with a high-tech control grid overlay designed to usher in a brave new world of hellish serfdom and eventually the dream of our eugenicist rulers: a mass culling of the herd who are considered little more than useless eaters.
 

bigben

Member
Aug 22, 2003
621
1
18
Christ almighty, would somebody please ban this nutbar already? He's posted, what, seven posts about pooning and a hundred about his nutcase conspiracy theories?
 

LightBearer

Banned
Nov 11, 2008
867
2
0
Did anyone force you hear to read this? Didn't think so. Sheep need to ligthen up a little. This instant anger towards any conspiracy just shows the level of ignorance the human race is under. Sleep tight slave, may your chains rest lightly upon you.
 

Restless

Tyrannosaurus Lix
Feb 9, 2004
212
12
18
Winnipeg
I had my doubts but if these two mental heavyweighs believe it then.........

Just for the record though could you quote one thing they have been proven correct on in the last decade?
 

zaig

Active member
Nov 21, 2003
274
24
28
Christ almighty, would somebody please ban this nutbar already? He's posted, what, seven posts about pooning and a hundred about his nutcase conspiracy theories?


Hey bigben, don't you know that we are the nutcases, and lighthead is one of only 12 sane people here.
 

deberry

New member
Jul 15, 2007
181
0
0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wH5YqsuZiw

Hannity, Morris Agree with “Conspiracy People” About New World Order


Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
March 31, 2009
In the video here, the former Clintonite Dick Morris, who is now a darling of Fox News, tells Sean Hannity the globalists will put the “American economy under international regulation” and “those people who have been yelling, oh, the UN is going to take over… they’ve been crazy, but now they’re right.”




Former Clintonite Dick Morris declares “those people who have been yelling, oh, the UN is going to take over… they’ve been crazy, but now they’re right.”

“Those conspiracy people,” Sean Hannity interjects, “had suggested that for years… you’re not wrong.”

It’s the “international regulation of the financial institutions” we have to worry about, warns Dick Morris. It will happen under “IMF control… Remember, the IMF is run by the Europeans and backed by Americans.”

It’s too bad Mr. Morris didn’t give us the rest of the story. The IMF is a loan sharking operation created by the bankers under the Bretton Woods scheme and its primary purpose to date has been to get third world nations into hock so they can be more effectively looted. It is now poised, as Morris eludes, to embark on a far more ambitious bankster scam — to initiate something called “global quantitative easing” by printing billions of dollars worth of a global “super-currency,” deceptively billed as a way to address the economic crisis manufactured by the global elite.

“Alistair Darling and senior figures in the US Treasury have been encouraging the Fund to issue hundreds of billions of dollars worth of so-called Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) in the coming months as part of its campaign to prevent the recession from turning into a global depression,” the Telegraph reported on March 16.

SDRs are now based on four currencies — the US dollar, the Japanese yen, the euro and the British pound. They are used largely as a unit of account by the IMF and other international organizations.

Read between the lines and you get to the bottom of the real reason for the issuance of SDRs — to push for a world currency. Recall a few days ago Zhou Xiaochuan, China’s central bank’s governor, calling for the IMF to forge a new world reserve currency.

China demands a settlement system between the SDRs and other currencies so that they can be used in international trade and financial transactions. The IMF would manage these SDRs and they would gradually replace existing reserve currencies.

As envisioned by our rulers, a world “super-currency” will ultimately require a world government. Morris blames the Europeans for this and he is only partially right — it is a scam long ago devised by international bankers primarily based in Europe and Britain and backed, as Morris admits, by the American financial elite.

The issuance of paper SDRs “would please the plutocratic international bankers” to no end, writes Robert Bradshaw, and this “move would allow them a golden opportunity to print fiat paper money in huge quantities to flood the world. We can be sure that the fat cats [the bankers] would love to have a new paper world currency in their greedy little hands. Since they already control the IMF and most world central banks, such a new global currency would definitely fit into their plans for world rule.”

It is hardly surprising that SDRs and world currency will be on the agenda at the G20 this week. The globalist George Soros has urged Obama to push the SDR agenda and has warned that if a world currency is not established and the global economy collapses (as planned) the United States “shall cease to be the dominant financial power” and “China is liable to come up ahead.” Soros is merely running a time-tested shell game in an effort to get the U.S. to pony up for what will ultimately be its demise, again as planned. China is the model to be used for our totalitarian future.

Dick Morris and the disinfo operative Sean Hannity may indeed be alarmed by this obvious push for world government. It is interesting to note that Hannity has only lately come around to the existence of the New World Order — formerly in the realm of crazy conspiracy theories — now that Obama is in the White House and the Democrats in control of Congress. Hannity and Morris are simply reading from a provided script.

Point is, the New World Order wants you to know what they have in mind for you. It tickles them to give you a preview of things to come now that the New Savior is in office and enjoying high popularity — a one world government with a high-tech control grid overlay designed to usher in a brave new world of hellish serfdom and eventually the dream of our eugenicist rulers: a mass culling of the herd who are considered little more than useless eaters.
Great article. They have no choice but to admit world currency is coming. This is what the New World Order has always wanted. Ultimate control. Thanks for posting lightbearer.
 

zaig

Active member
Nov 21, 2003
274
24
28
Great article. They have no choice but to admit world currency is coming. This is what the New World Order has always wanted. Ultimate control. Thanks for posting lightbearer.

Do I call you stooge 1 or stooge 2.

Since both you stoogies really believe in this unadulterated garbage, my question oh great swami, is when can we expect this? Are we looking at 1 year, 10 years, 50 years.

Anyone can predict things, the big question is when they will happen. I will give you 10 to 1 odds you won't live long enough to ever see what you and lighthead believe in.

You guys really are quite entertaining.
 

LightBearer

Banned
Nov 11, 2008
867
2
0
Do I call you stooge 1 or stooge 2.

Since both you stoogies really believe in this unadulterated garbage, my question oh great swami, is when can we expect this? Are we looking at 1 year, 10 years, 50 years.

Anyone can predict things, the big question is when they will happen. I will give you 10 to 1 odds you won't live long enough to ever see what you and lighthead believe in.

You guys really are quite entertaining.
so because I might not be here when it happens I should just shut up? There will be other humans on this planet am I allowed to warn them? Go be a good slave and worship your criminal government.
 

wess

New member
Jan 5, 2009
614
2
0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wH5YqsuZiw

Hannity, Morris Agree with “Conspiracy People” About New World Order


Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
March 31, 2009
In the video here, the former Clintonite Dick Morris, who is now a darling of Fox News, tells Sean Hannity the globalists will put the “American economy under international regulation” and “those people who have been yelling, oh, the UN is going to take over… they’ve been crazy, but now they’re right.”




Former Clintonite Dick Morris declares “those people who have been yelling, oh, the UN is going to take over… they’ve been crazy, but now they’re right.”

“Those conspiracy people,” Sean Hannity interjects, “had suggested that for years… you’re not wrong.”

It’s the “international regulation of the financial institutions” we have to worry about, warns Dick Morris. It will happen under “IMF control… Remember, the IMF is run by the Europeans and backed by Americans.”

It’s too bad Mr. Morris didn’t give us the rest of the story. The IMF is a loan sharking operation created by the bankers under the Bretton Woods scheme and its primary purpose to date has been to get third world nations into hock so they can be more effectively looted. It is now poised, as Morris eludes, to embark on a far more ambitious bankster scam — to initiate something called “global quantitative easing” by printing billions of dollars worth of a global “super-currency,” deceptively billed as a way to address the economic crisis manufactured by the global elite.

“Alistair Darling and senior figures in the US Treasury have been encouraging the Fund to issue hundreds of billions of dollars worth of so-called Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) in the coming months as part of its campaign to prevent the recession from turning into a global depression,” the Telegraph reported on March 16.

SDRs are now based on four currencies — the US dollar, the Japanese yen, the euro and the British pound. They are used largely as a unit of account by the IMF and other international organizations.

Read between the lines and you get to the bottom of the real reason for the issuance of SDRs — to push for a world currency. Recall a few days ago Zhou Xiaochuan, China’s central bank’s governor, calling for the IMF to forge a new world reserve currency.

China demands a settlement system between the SDRs and other currencies so that they can be used in international trade and financial transactions. The IMF would manage these SDRs and they would gradually replace existing reserve currencies.

As envisioned by our rulers, a world “super-currency” will ultimately require a world government. Morris blames the Europeans for this and he is only partially right — it is a scam long ago devised by international bankers primarily based in Europe and Britain and backed, as Morris admits, by the American financial elite.

The issuance of paper SDRs “would please the plutocratic international bankers” to no end, writes Robert Bradshaw, and this “move would allow them a golden opportunity to print fiat paper money in huge quantities to flood the world. We can be sure that the fat cats [the bankers] would love to have a new paper world currency in their greedy little hands. Since they already control the IMF and most world central banks, such a new global currency would definitely fit into their plans for world rule.”

It is hardly surprising that SDRs and world currency will be on the agenda at the G20 this week. The globalist George Soros has urged Obama to push the SDR agenda and has warned that if a world currency is not established and the global economy collapses (as planned) the United States “shall cease to be the dominant financial power” and “China is liable to come up ahead.” Soros is merely running a time-tested shell game in an effort to get the U.S. to pony up for what will ultimately be its demise, again as planned. China is the model to be used for our totalitarian future.

Dick Morris and the disinfo operative Sean Hannity may indeed be alarmed by this obvious push for world government. It is interesting to note that Hannity has only lately come around to the existence of the New World Order — formerly in the realm of crazy conspiracy theories — now that Obama is in the White House and the Democrats in control of Congress. Hannity and Morris are simply reading from a provided script.

Point is, the New World Order wants you to know what they have in mind for you. It tickles them to give you a preview of things to come now that the New Savior is in office and enjoying high popularity — a one world government with a high-tech control grid overlay designed to usher in a brave new world of hellish serfdom and eventually the dream of our eugenicist rulers: a mass culling of the herd who are considered little more than useless eaters.
There is no fucking new world order you imbecile. A new world order would mean that Russia and China will be governed by some international ruler ?????

If you think that Vladimir Putin is going to be bossed around by some new world order then you need help.
 

LightBearer

Banned
Nov 11, 2008
867
2
0
How I Learned to Love the New World Order - Biden, Joseph R Jr.
EmailWritten by citizenp on Sep-3-08 7:04pm
From: www.conspiracyblogger.com
How I Learned to Love the New World Order was originally published in the Wall Street Journal April 23, 1992 on page A13.

Joseph R. Biden Jr defends his view that the Pentagon’s new strategy which appoints the US as a sort of world monitor could render the US a hollow superpower. Biden explains why he reacted the way he did to the plan.


Imagine my surprise when a Wall Street Journal editorial appointed me dean of the Pat Buchanan school of neo-isolationism. My credentials? Believing that the Pentagon’s new strategy — America as “Globocop” — could render the United States a hollow superpower. All agree we need the military capacity to defend our vital interests — by ourselves when need be. The question is grand strategy. With the Journal’s endorsement, the Pentagon has called for a Pax Americana: The U.S. should cast so large a military shadow that no rival dare emerge.

American hegemony might be a pleasant idea, but is it economically, politically or even militarily wise? Bristling with weapons, we would continue our economic decline, while rising industrial and financial giants in Europe and Asia viewed our military pretensions with indifference or contempt.

Defense Secretary Dick Cheney outdid even the Journal, dipping deep into the well of Cold War argumentation to accuse Pax Americana critics of thinking “America’s world presence is somehow immoral and dangerous.

” Why doesn’t the Journal stop the namecalling, get its schools sorted out, and court an honest debate over America’s proper role in the new world order?

Pat Buchanan’s “America First” preaches martyrdom: We’ve been suckered into fighting “other” people’s battles and defending “other” people’s interests. With our dismal economy, this siren song holds some appeal.

But most Americans, myself included, reject 1930s-style isolationism. They expect to see the strong hand of American leadership in world affairs, and they know that economic retreat would yield nothing other than a lower standard of living. They understand further that many security threats — the spread of high-tech weapons, environmental degradation, overpopulation, narcotics trafficking, migration — require global solutions.

What about America as globocop? First, our 21st-century strategy has to be a shade more clever than Mao’s axiom that power comes from the barrel of a gun. Power also emanates from a solid bank balance, the ability to dominate and penetrate markets, and the economic leverage to wield diplomatic clout.

Second, the plan is passive where it needs to be aggressive. The Journal endorses a global security system in which we destroy rogue-state threats as they arise. Fine, but let’s prevent such problems early rather than curing them late. Having contained Soviet communism until it dissolved, we need a new strategy of “containment” — based, like NATO, on collective action, but directed against weapons proliferation.

The reality is that we can slow proliferation to a snail’s pace if we stop irresponsible technology transfers. Fortunately, nearly all suppliers are finally showing restraint. The maverick is China, which persists in hawking sensitive weapons and technology to the likes of Syria, Iran, Libya, Algeria and Pakistan — even while pledging otherwise.

The Senate has tried to force China’s leaders to choose between Third World arms sales (1991 profits of $500 million) and open trade with the U.S. (a $12.5 billion annual Chinese surplus). Even though we have convincing intelligence that China’s leaders fear the use of this leverage, the president inexplicably refuses to challenge Beijing.

Weapons containment can’t be foolproof; and against a nuclear-armed North Korea, I would support pre-emptive military action if necessary. But let’s do our best — using supplier restraint and sanctions against outlaw sellers and buyers-to avoid having to round up the posse.

Why not an anti-proliferation “czar” in the cabinet to give this objective the prominence it urgently needs?

Third, Pax Americana is a direct slap at two of our closest allies — Japan and Germany — and a repudiation of one of our panel1. Rather than denigrating collective security, we should regularize the kind of multilateral response we assembled for the Gulf War. Why not breathe life into the U.N. Charter? great postwar triumphs. For years, American leaders argued that building democracy in Europe and Asia would guarantee stability because democracies don’t start wars. Now the Pentagon says we must keep our military large enough to persuade Japan and Germany “not to aspire to a greater role even to protect their legitimate interests.”

How has our success suddenly become a threat? It hasn’t, but the Pentagon plan could become a self-fulfilling prophecy. By insulting Tokyo and Berlin, and arrogating to ourselves military stewardship of the world, we may spark the revival no one wants.

Secretary Cheney says he wants the allies to share the burden on defense matters. But Pax Americana puts us on the wrong end of a paradox: Hegemony means that even our allies can force ever greater U.S.

defense spending the more they try to share the burden!

Fourth, collective security doesn’t rule out unilateral action. The Journal says I’m among those who want “Americans . . . to trust their security to a global committee.” But no one advocates that we repeal the “inherent” right of self-defense enshrined in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter.

Secretary Cheney says his plan wouldn’t undermine support for the U.N. Who would know better than the U.N.’s usually understated secretary general? If implemented, says Boutros Boutros-Ghali, the Pentagon’s strategy would spell “the end of the U.N.” Rather than denigrating collective security, we should regularize the kind of multilateral response we assembled for the Gulf War. Why not breathe life into the U.N. Charter? It envisages a permanent commitment of forces, for use by the Security Council. That means a presumption of collective action — but with a U.S. veto.

Rather than defending military extravagance, the Bush administration should be reallocating Pentagon funds to meet more urgent security needs: sustaining democracy in the former Soviet empire; supporting U.N. peacekeepers in Yugoslavia, Cambodia and El Salvador; and rebuilding a weakened and debt-burdened America.

If Pentagon strategists and their kneejerk supporters could broaden their horizons, they would see how our superpower status is best assured. We must get lean militarily, revitalize American economic strength, and exercise a diplomatic leadership that puts new muscle into institutions of collective security.
 

LightBearer

Banned
Nov 11, 2008
867
2
0
There is no fucking new world order you imbecile. A new world order would mean that Russia and China will be governed by some international ruler ?????

If you think that Vladimir Putin is going to be bossed around by some new world order then you need help.
Gary Hart CFR member after 9/11 "The president can use this disaster to carry out what his father called a new world order"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5r7htckec-U
 

LightBearer

Banned
Nov 11, 2008
867
2
0
There is no fucking new world order you imbecile. A new world order would mean that Russia and China will be governed by some international ruler ?????

If you think that Vladimir Putin is going to be bossed around by some new world order then you need help.
So if there is no NWO then why do these people keep saying it? Was Clinton coked up? Probably but still WHY?

Henry Kissinger
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KD3BqK-9ZiU&feature=related
 

myselftheother

rubatugtug
Dec 2, 2004
1,275
14
38
vancouver
It's not the New World Order.....it is the World Order and it isn't new. Been going on for decades. Ever since WWII. Took you this long to figure that out?

So, LB....what do we do? What's the solution? There's the problem, now what? Being a siren of doom is just fine, but use your alex Jones decoder ring and tell me....what is the solution that will save us all?
 

wess

New member
Jan 5, 2009
614
2
0
It's not the New World Order.....it is the World Order and it isn't new. Been going on for decades. Ever since WWII. Took you this long to figure that out?

So, LB....what do we do? What's the solution? There's the problem, now what? Being a siren of doom is just fine, but use your alex Jones decoder ring and tell me....what is the solution that will save us all?
Maybe you can answer the my question better then light head if think there is a " new world order "
 

HankQuinlan

I dont re Member
Sep 7, 2002
1,744
6
0
victoria
You have to understand the meaning of the phrase to understand how LB's mind works.

To normal people, the phrase "new world order" is however the speaker is defining it to mean a shift in world power from the present (during whatever period of history it was used). Hitler's "New Order" meant that the aryan race would dominate the world.

To the conspiracy devotees, it is a code for their definition of the phrase, so that anyone who uses it has indiscretely let out part of the master plan. Therefore, for example, an article quoting Joe Biden from 1992 with the phrase in the title is proof that he is a willing puppet of the masters.

Of course there will be a "new world order." Power has shifted from one empire to another throughout history. The US will eventually fade from its domination of world affairs, which has lasted only about a century. Many believe this is happening now, and that the shift will be to China and India.

I have always liked the "Star Trek" universe envisioned by Gene Roddenberry where all the nations have united and used their resources to conquer poverty instead of waging war....although I believe there was a World War III before that happened....
 

LightBearer

Banned
Nov 11, 2008
867
2
0
You have to understand the meaning of the phrase to understand how LB's mind works.

To normal people, the phrase "new world order" is however the speaker is defining it to mean a shift in world power from the present (during whatever period of history it was used). Hitler's "New Order" meant that the aryan race would dominate the world.

To the conspiracy devotees, it is a code for their definition of the phrase, so that anyone who uses it has indiscretely let out part of the master plan. Therefore, for example, an article quoting Joe Biden from 1992 with the phrase in the title is proof that he is a willing puppet of the masters.

Of course there will be a "new world order." Power has shifted from one empire to another throughout history. The US will eventually fade from its domination of world affairs, which has lasted only about a century. Many believe this is happening now, and that the shift will be to China and India.

I have always liked the "Star Trek" universe envisioned by Gene Roddenberry where all the nations have united and used their resources to conquer poverty instead of waging war....although I believe there was a World War III before that happened....
I was thinking EXACTLY about star trek this morning how they have a one world government on earth. And humans keep saying "we work to better ourselves". Like humanity has been reprogrammed/reeducated. The federation logo is the UN logo with a starfield.
 

LightBearer

Banned
Nov 11, 2008
867
2
0
You did not explain yourself very well. WHO IS GOING TO BOSS VLAD AROUND ?


WHO WILL OCCUPY THE KREMLIN ?
Putin is a puppet in the NWO, if he wasnt he wouldn't be allowed to run Russia. Ask JFK or any other dictator that was assasinated.
 
Vancouver Escorts