Hannity, Morris Agree with “Conspiracy People” About New World Order

[wess]

You still cant explain the unexplainable. Your religion is flawed

 

[LightBearer]

You still cant explain the unexplainable. Your religion is flawed

Thats a white flag right there. A real man would just say it but you.....

 

[LightBearer]

You still cant explain the unexplainable. Your religion is flawed

You said theres no NWO and I posted about 4 links to the G20 meeting where they are calling for a NWO. Then you change the subject. This is why your belief system is WRONG! Name calling is hardly an arguement ok?

 

[HankQuinlan]

TIME MAGAZINE
Barack Obama's New World Order
By Michael Scherer / Strasbourg Friday, Apr. 03, 2009President Barack Obama speaks during a town-hall meeting at Rhenus Sports Arena in Strasbourg, eastern France, on April 3, 2009
Lionel Bonaventure / AFP / Getty

The United States is still the same country it was a year ago, give or take about 6 million jobs. But its international branding campaign, as led by the new President, Barack Obama, is so different that the rest of the world might be forgiven if it has to do a double take.


Most of the hallmarks of the foreign policy of George W. Bush are gone. The old conservative idea of "American exceptionalism," which placed the U.S. on a plane above the rest of the world as a unique beacon of democracy and financial might, has been rejected. At almost every stop, Obama has made clear that the U.S. is but one actor in a global community. Talk of American economic supremacy has been replaced by a call from Obama for more growth in developing countries. Claims of American military supremacy have been replaced with heavy emphasis on cooperation and diplomatic hard labor. (Read "Obama in Europe: Facing Four Big Challenges.")

The tone was set from Obama's first public remarks in London on Wednesday, at a press conference with Prime Minister Gordon Brown, where the American President said he had come "to listen, not to lecture." At a joint appearance with German Chancellor Angela Merkel in Baden-Baden on Friday, a German reporter asked Obama about his "grand designs" for NATO. "I don't come bearing grand designs," Obama said, scrapping the leadership role the U.S. maintained through the Cold War. "I'm here to listen, to share ideas and to jointly, as one of many NATO allies, help shape our vision for the future."

On Thursday night, after the G-20 summit ended, Obama took so many questions from the foreign press, including British, Indian and Chinese reporters, that a group of them applauded when he left the stage. Two American reporters asked Obama for his response to the claim by Brown that the "Washington consensus is over." Obama all but agreed with Brown, noting that the phrase had its roots in a significant set of economic policies that had shown itself to be imperfect. He went on to talk about the benefits of increasing economic competition with the U.S. "That's not a loss for America," he said of the economic rise of other powers. "It's an appreciation that Europe is now rebuilt and a powerhouse. Japan is rebuilt, is a powerhouse. China, India — these are all countries on the move. And that's good."

At a town hall in Strasbourg, France, Obama stood before an audience of mostly French and German youth and admitted that the U.S. should have a greater respect for Europe. "In America, there's a failure to appreciate Europe's leading role in the world," he said before offering other European critical views of his country. "There have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive."

The contrast is striking. Only four years ago, George W. Bush, in his second Inaugural Address, described what he called America's "considerable" influence, saying, "We will use it confidently in freedom's cause." Bush's vision of American power was combative and aggressive. He said the U.S. would "seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture." He continued, "We go forward with complete confidence in the eventual triumph of freedom."

Obama, by contrast, is looking for collaboration. He is looking to build a collective vision, not to impose an American one. And the response has been notable, from the endless flashbulbs that fired off at his town hall to the cheers of spectators who lined his motorcade routes and gathered outside his events in London. At the end of Obama's Friday press conference, French President Nicolas Sarkozy addressed the issue directly, speaking through an interpreter. "It feels really good to be able to work with a U.S. President who wants to change the world and who understands that the world does not boil down to simply American frontiers and borders," he said. "And that is a hell of a good piece of news for 2009."

...and this is bad news because....?

It uses the code words "New World Order" that, to paranoid minds (i.e., true believers), evoke the jack boots and barbed wire. The content and ideas are of no importance, because it uses those words, which can only mean one thing. Anything to do with internationalism is bad, and is one more step towards ultimate tyranny and the enslavement of freedom-loving Americans. The end is near! The decades of carefully manipulating world events is finally coming to fruition! (insert evil laugh)

Normal people, who don't salivate on command when they hear certain words, recognize that a new world order is essential. I would like to believe that this article actually represented the truth (I have my doubts, of course, since these are all politicians with their own agendas). Hurray for a new world order, because we darn well need one.

(Lightbearer: please re-insert the link about buildings falling wrong that completely proves the entire mythology.)

 

[LightBearer]

...and this is bad news because....?

It uses the code words "New World Order" that, to paranoid minds (i.e., true believers), evoke the jack boots and barbed wire. The content and ideas are of no importance, because it uses those words, which can only mean one thing. Anything to do with internationalism is bad, and is one more step towards ultimate tyranny and the enslavement of freedom-loving Americans. The end is near! The decades of carefully manipulating world events is finally coming to fruition! (insert evil laugh)

Normal people, who don't salivate on command when they hear certain words, recognize that a new world order is essential. I would like to believe that this article actually represented the truth (I have my doubts, of course, since these are all politicians with their own agendas). Hurray for a new world order, because we darn well need one.

(Lightbearer: please re-insert the link about buildings falling wrong that completely proves the entire mythology.)

Ok so if we have a one world government and a Hilter type guy becomes president of the world HOW do we fight back? With what army? All the power consolidated in one place is dangerous. Especially when its run by the criminal bankers that engineered the crisis to give them this world power on the guise its in our best interests.


http://www.ae911truth.org/ Its a site by architects that doubt the 9/11 official story.

And then theres the Japanese congress.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOF_pXW84io

 

[myselftheother]

Ok so if we have a one world government and a Hilter type guy becomes president of the world HOW do we fight back? With what army? All the power consolidated in one place is dangerous. Especially when its run by the criminal bankers that engineered the crisis to give them this world power on the guise its in our best interests.


http://www.ae911truth.org/ Its a site by architects that doubt the 9/11 official story.

And then theres the Japanese congress.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOF_pXW84io

There, there...don't fret, LB. We're a long way from a centric world government. IF we get to that point, and IF the world's countries and states could even agree to settle their souverign differences....and IF there was a king of the world contest that voted in another Hitler or Stalin or Mao....that's a lot of 'IF's.

 

[wess]

You said theres no NWO and I posted about 4 links to the G20 meeting where they are calling for a NWO. Then you change the subject. This is why your belief system is WRONG! Name calling is hardly an arguement ok?

You are the one that changed the fucking subject,

PROVE THAT VLADIMIR PUTIN IS A PUPPET


PROVE THAT THE FEDERAL RESERVE IS IN CONTROL OF ALL OF THESE LEADERS.

 

[myselftheother]

You said theres no NWO and I posted about 4 links to the G20 meeting where they are calling for a NWO. Then you change the subject. This is why your belief system is WRONG! Name calling is hardly an arguement ok?

Yeah...you've never bowed down to that level before....

 

[LightBearer]

There, there...don't fret, LB. We're a long way from a centric world government. IF we get to that point, and IF the world's countries and states could even agree to settle their souverign differences....and IF there was a king of the world contest that voted in another Hitler or Stalin or Mao....that's a lot of 'IF's.

What the hell do you think this G20 meeting was for? World governement.

 

[LightBearer]

Yeah...you've never bowed down to that level before....

I only insult after they call me a tin foil hat wearing kook. They insult first I counter.

 

[LightBearer]

You are the one that changed the fucking subject,

PROVE THAT VLADIMIR PUTIN IS A PUPPET


PROVE THAT THE FEDERAL RESERVE IS IN CONTROL OF ALL OF THESE LEADERS.

Why so after you realise hes a puppet you;'ll move onto a nother question like I didnt properly answer your? Fuck you and find some free fall collapsing buildings. If you can't find one just admitt it.

 

[myselftheother]

What the hell do you think this G20 meeting was for? World governement.

Maybe...but not yet.

 

[LightBearer]

Maybe...but not yet.

So I guess we don't protest until its here and there is no way to fight back. Like the germans should have just layed down to Hitler.

If you go to the doctor for a physical and he tells you. "you have a brain tumor" Do you go go about your life until it becomes a problem?

 

[HankQuinlan]

You are the one that changed the fucking subject,

PROVE THAT VLADIMIR PUTIN IS A PUPPET


PROVE THAT THE FEDERAL RESERVE IS IN CONTROL OF ALL OF THESE LEADERS.

There is no need to prove it. If it is a given that a cabal of royalty and financiers control all world events, then by definition all world leaders are puppets to their agenda. Pay special attention to this one:

 

[wess]

Why so after you realise hes a puppet you;'ll move onto a nother question like I didnt properly answer your? Fuck you and find some free fall collapsing buildings. If you can't find one just admitt it.

Give me one RUMOR that suggests that Vladimir Putin is a puppet of the fucking federal reserve.

 

[LightBearer]

Give me one RUMOR that suggests that Vladimir Putin is a puppet of the fucking federal reserve.

He's not a puppet of the FED. I never said that. *shakes head* He's a puppet of the big bankers. Not the ones that run the Fed. The Fed isnt the only bank in the world.

So wheres that building? You could have posted it 1000 times by now but since it doesnt exist keep changing the question. If you can't find one single steel framed building that has EVER collasped due to fires at free fall speed, then shut up and go away.

 

[HankQuinlan]

Give me one RUMOR that suggests that Vladimir Putin is a puppet of the fucking federal reserve.

I'll help Lightbearer out. These prove indisputably that Putin is part of the New World Order:

http://www.atimes.com/c-asia/CI28Ag03.html

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/663

This video proves that the federal reserve is an instrument of the plotters of the New World Order:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUfCELKCguc

Therefore, Putin is part of the federal reserve's conspiracy.

Hey...it's on the internet.

On the other hand, since Jews also control the New World Order, there is also incontrovertable evidence that Putin is against it:

http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=84

Hey -- it's on the internet too, so it must be true.

And face it, you're going to have to burn down a building of the correct specifications, or Lightbearer will be proved absolutely correct about everything.

 

[LightBearer]

I'll help Lightbearer out. These prove indisputably that Putin is part of the New World Order:

http://www.atimes.com/c-asia/CI28Ag03.html

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/663

This video proves that the federal reserve is an instrument of the plotters of the New World Order:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUfCELKCguc

Therefore, Putin is part of the federal reserve's conspiracy.

Hey...it's on the internet.

On the other hand, since Jews also control the New World Order, there is also incontrovertable evidence that Putin is against it:

http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=84

Hey -- it's on the internet too, so it must be true.

And face it, you're going to have to burn down a building of the correct specifications, or Lightbearer will be proved absolutely correct about everything.

Ok so if I have a pic of the Lochness monster off the net that makes it true by your view. Um no you have to use common sense and determine ok what is this and do a background check, you go see if this or that really existed. I'm dealing with children here.

 

[wess]

He's not a puppet of the FED. I never said that. *shakes head* He's a puppet of the big bankers. Not the ones that run the Fed. The Fed isnt the only bank in the world.

So wheres that building? You could have posted it 1000 times by now but since it doesnt exist keep changing the question. If you can't find one single steel framed building that has EVER collasped due to fires at free fall speed, then shut up and go away.

hahaha, here you are basing all your cult preseptions of history and future on the speed of a building falling down.

 

[HankQuinlan]

Ok so if I have a pic of the Lochness monster off the net that makes it true by your view. Um no you have to use common sense and determine ok what is this and do a background check, you go see if this or that really existed. I'm dealing with children here.

...and what do you check it against? ...let's see??? ....TRUTHER sites maybe?

And the Loch Ness monster is true! I saw it in magazine before the internet even! That makes it double true!