Draft of review template, comments and suggestions welcomed.
- Thread starter Fred Zed
- Start date
Fred..... IMHO this is a great idea. I think the idea of having 2 levels of review forms might be in order. Some folks have very short attention spans in reading and/or writing. Others often want to, or will offer all the details. Re the Trolls and shills on here, this may help, but a review form doesn't stop it. I can't think of anything that will. I have seen at least one long standing regular on here trip over his own words when calling down a very nice (in my view) escort.
you can see the number of posts he has and what he posted, its all in his profile already. We dont want to turn this into an encyclopedia. just a simple template thats not overly time consumingHow about some way to validate the reviewer?
Maybe add the number of posts he has, number of reviews posted, member since field?
Try to eliminate the trolls, fake reviewers
Corym
the idea of the template is to encourage new members to contribute. when you are first getting your feet wet, its easier to follow a guide. reviewers will have the option of freehand, or template
I totally get that and agree. It's a great way to get newcomers to easily post a review and stick to the rules.
Even though it is personal or maybe someone can have a bad day, I believe that if a provider is reviewed repeatedly you will be able to see a trend which helps.
It’s one thing to mention the services you received from a SP in a review.
It’s another thing when reviewers are telling other pooners what is allowed. A review does not equal consent.
dude. gross. please never book with me. if anyone ever filled out any of this (besides the first question obviously) in a review I would never book with them.
SORRY for the triple post omg.
I spent some time and edited it to be more provider friendly!
---
Reviewers Age: (Optional)
Years visiting providers:
Number of providers visited:
Provider's Name:
Agency / Indie:
Link to provider's ad or Web site:
Is this a repeat session:
Yes, no, multiple repeats
Donation:
(include whether there are different donations for different services and what you paid for—eg PSE)
Appearance:
Looked like photos, photos were old or heavily edited, was not the same person as the photos
[I merged appearance and photos because I feel like it's redundant to have both]
Tattoos:
Heavily inked, many, few, barely noticeable, none
Piercings:
Many, few, none
Smoker:
Yes noticeable but I requested smoking, yes noticeable but I did not request smoking, yes told me they were a smoker but I could not tell, non-smoker, not sure
Cleanliness:
Showered / unshowered
Incall:
Luxurious, comfortable, adequate, humble, run down
Supplies:
Above and beyond, the necessities, missing/inadequate
[I removed chemistry because I feel like that’s super YMMV and doesn’t really have anything to do with the abilities of the provider]
Service style (select all that apply):
Sultry, silly, ravenous, coy, disinterested, robotic, under the influence, engaging, unfiltered, spunky, adventurous, playful, flirty, etc (feel free to add)
Boundaries:
Outlined boundaries clearly before session and explained that they can change, did not outline boundaries clearly before session or explain that they can change.
Satisfied with experience:
Satisfied, feeling okay, disappointed
Would you recommend:
Yes, maybe, no
Will you repeat:
Yes, maybe, no
Comments:
I spent some time and edited it to be more provider friendly!
---
Reviewers Age: (Optional)
Years visiting providers:
Number of providers visited:
Provider's Name:
Agency / Indie:
Link to provider's ad or Web site:
Is this a repeat session:
Yes, no, multiple repeats
Donation:
(include whether there are different donations for different services and what you paid for—eg PSE)
Appearance:
Looked like photos, photos were old or heavily edited, was not the same person as the photos
[I merged appearance and photos because I feel like it's redundant to have both]
Tattoos:
Heavily inked, many, few, barely noticeable, none
Piercings:
Many, few, none
Smoker:
Yes noticeable but I requested smoking, yes noticeable but I did not request smoking, yes told me they were a smoker but I could not tell, non-smoker, not sure
Cleanliness:
Showered / unshowered
Incall:
Luxurious, comfortable, adequate, humble, run down
Supplies:
Above and beyond, the necessities, missing/inadequate
[I removed chemistry because I feel like that’s super YMMV and doesn’t really have anything to do with the abilities of the provider]
Service style (select all that apply):
Sultry, silly, ravenous, coy, disinterested, robotic, under the influence, engaging, unfiltered, spunky, adventurous, playful, flirty, etc (feel free to add)
Boundaries:
Outlined boundaries clearly before session and explained that they can change, did not outline boundaries clearly before session or explain that they can change.
Satisfied with experience:
Satisfied, feeling okay, disappointed
Would you recommend:
Yes, maybe, no
Will you repeat:
Yes, maybe, no
Comments:
If I was to write reviews I would use is but I would not fill this:
Reviewers Age: (Optional)
Years visiting providers:
Number of providers visited:
I do like the format Charlee has here. I, too wouldn't fill in the options Loki listed. I feel those are irrelevant. I would, however, add a "warning " option but, I guess that may be specified elsewhere like in the " boundaries " area. Anyhow, this looks good.
The only reason I can see these being relevant (I just copied them from the original draft)
1. clients near this age will know that this provider sees clients of that age (unless the provider made an exception in this instance)
2. other clients will know how "experienced" the reviewer is, if that matters for some reason
1. clients near this age will know that this provider sees clients of that age (unless the provider made an exception in this instance)
2. other clients will know how "experienced" the reviewer is, if that matters for some reason
Agreed.
My clients are intelligent, articulate and capable of phrasing their review in the way that they see fit. I enjoy reading their accounts of our experience together which is just written by them in their own voice. I personally don’t feel a template is necessary
a template is a nice option for newbies who are just getting their feet wet. Its a nice guide to follow for the inexperienced. Freehand reviews will also still be an option
