Details with reviews - discussion thread

[Newuser505]

I think the reaction system can self regulate what the community thinks is good or bad reviews.

Some people make quick, to the point reviews. I think those have a place too. Barring people who are not colorful with their language will make some legitimate, but short reviewers not want to participate.

I agree too, that play by play reviewers are a bit much.

Personally, I enjoy poetic reviews. Like user @Beasting. There is charm and wit in his

 

[grusse]

I guess it's not against the rules when the boasting starts, eg she was admiring my 6-pack abs,etc.
It's actually entertaining, guys trying to mask their insecurity,lol

 

[MB Mod]

One of the lines in the template is:



The Forum Rules say:



Leolist links seem to be fine. I have no idea if links to Tryst profiles are allowed.

Presumably, SP, MP, and Agency websites that are not advertisers are not allowed

You are correct links to LeoList are okay, absolutely no links to Tryst, OM, LC agencies that are not paid advertisers.

 

[VanCityNewb]

You are correct links to LeoList are okay, absolutely no links to Tryst, OM, LC agencies that are not paid advertisers.

But Leolist aren't paid advertisers?

At least you guys decided to be honest about deleting reviews now, while still not replying to your messages. 👍

 

[rinamood]

But Leolist aren't paid advertisers?

This is something I have questioned too. If the purpose of posting links is to accurately identify the SP, why are only LL links allowed?

 

[SmikeSmith]

This is a reply to Harmony’s point, but I’m not going to quote it because it made a really good point. Ultimately, the provider gets the final say with regards to what you can do with them, whether or not we pay. Posting the blow-by-blow might leave some guys to get mad saying “why didn’t I get a bbbj”, meanwhile they haven’t washed their junk for a week.

I’m sure there’s a reasonable middle ground. “We negotiated services based on her ad… it was super duper, would see again”, but I can also see why some punters would want more information.

I'm totally going to “both sides make valid points” on this one, because I did have a good time with Harmony, but also respect that she doesn’t want me to give all the details.

 

[SolidSnake]

I hope those self-reviews that describe the poster himself more than the SP or the session, get deleted and receive infractions too.

 

[Forum mod]

I hope those self-reviews that describe the poster himself more than the SP or the session, get deleted and receive infractions too.

Bragging and self promotion of the guy's prowess isn't against the rules, and the community sees through it pretty quickly. Hopefully the poster learns from the likely scorn.

 

[SmikeSmith]

Bragging and self promotion of the guy's prowess isn't against the rules, and the community sees through it pretty quickly. Hopefully the poster learns from the likely scorn.

I like to make a point of exaggerating my own prowess, so that the review comes with more gravitas. So that folks feel like they’re learning from a true Master.

 

[Newuser505]

I like to make a point of exaggerating my own prowess, so that the review comes with more gravitas. So that folks feel like they’re learning from a true Master.

You gotta dumb it down a bit though. The feeling of your 28 inch cock hitting her diaphragm is unrelatable to the peasants.

 

[SmikeSmith]

You gotta dumb it down a bit though. The feeling of your 28 inch cock hitting her diaphragm is unrelatable to the peasants.

No, it’s a pretty normal 8.5”. But the diameter is a little over 28”.

 

[Harmony-bc]

No, it’s a pretty normal 8.5”. But the diameter is a little over 28”.

Ouch ouch ouch ouch 🤕 lol

 

[Bluesmile86]

Please chime in, what are you basic expectations for a review?

Thank you for raising the question to make the forum more informative.

Many reviews seem to raise more questions than answers, almost as if it’s intentional. The same FAQs keep coming up (age estimate, looks, body type, boobs size/feel, shaved, DFK, etc.), which in turn drives more attention to those reviews.

Having done a couple of full detailed reviews to date, people are welcome to use my review template and I’ve already seen others adopting it. Otherwise, they can use the forum's template as a great baseline.

People often say ratings are subjective, and they are as some are way too high, but I also know many rely on them as a useful point of reference.

 

[asf_post]

This is a good topic, thanks for making the thread.

There are two things I don't like seeing in the review:
- "not going into details..." and just saying she's great/the best/top notch/whatever really positive service
- "i know this is off-topic, but ...." well you know it's off topic, maybe don't mention it?

And I'm not too fond of the ratings because everybody's opinion would be different. My 8 could be a 5 for somebody else 🤷‍♂️

 

[westwoody]

Details are great but I wonder if some guys just want excessive details for wank fodder.

BBBJ on a freshly shaved spotless guy vs some sweaty mass of pubes? Digits with a freshly manicured careful guy or some asshole who wants to see how far up he stick his forearm?
As long as there are socially inept brutes reading some things are best kept to yourself.
Discretion is a lost quality. And so is reading between the lines.

 

[Pumped]

I guess it's not against the rules when the boasting starts, eg she was admiring my 6-pack abs,etc.
It's actually entertaining, guys trying to mask their insecurity,lol

No, it’s a pretty normal 8.5”. But the diameter is a little over 28”.

Dyslexic can't tell his dick from his arm. Impressive.

 

[GeeBeeP]

You are correct links to LeoList are okay, absolutely no links to Tryst, OM, LC agencies that are not paid advertisers.

I understand the need to police links to other sites, but in some cases just a name and number don’t let other guys know who this girl is.

If a glowing review of a girl other pooners would like to see can't include a link, at least please include the site/social media/platform you found her on. There are some sites that alot of guys have never heard of and we won’t have a hope in hell of finding this girl.

 

[metchosin]

i just want to know if they look like their pictures, if they provided what was agreed upon or advertised, whether they were into it (or did a good job faking being into it) and if they were fun to be around. calling out when the incall is a mess or the communication is bad or that they discouraged certain services even though they were offered is good too

hate the numerical ratings, the play-by-play and the creepy (often private) followup messages from posters i get everytime i post a review

 

[Fiona]

We are getting WAY too many short reviews.

sorry this kinda cracks me up as most of us providers are so used of the “ u up “ “ u avail” “you working “
With no other info provided and no matter how much you assert your booking process it gets ignored , there’s a high chance this will only make men not review at all.
it won’t force anyone to review properly . They just won’t bother .but I agree , the same men amping up the same woman without actually reviewing is not ok .
Many men do this for certain ladies who give “arrangements “ not ok .
but good luck 🙂👍🏻

 

[Pumped]

sorry this kinda cracks me up as most of us providers are so used of the “ u up “ “ u avail” “you working “
With no other info provided and no matter how much you assert your booking process it gets ignored , there’s a high chance this will only make men not review at all.
it won’t force anyone to review properly . They just won’t bother .but I agree , the same men amping up the same woman without actually reviewing is not ok .
Many men do this for certain ladies who give “arrangements “ not ok .
but good luck 🙂👍🏻

The problem isn't with actual reviews, but that many of them are basically unpaid ads.

Hopefully guys will either start posting the basic outline of a review or have it get removed by a mod.

I guess a pimp in a van is either posting ads on LeoList or LL reviews on PERB.