So lets look at the JFK assassination. A conspiracy theory is "an attempt to explain harmful or tragic events as the result of the actions of a small powerful group. Such explanations reject the accepted narrative surrounding those events " or "A conspiracy theory is an explanation for an event or situation that invokes a conspiracy by sinister and powerful groups, often political in motivation, when other explanations are more probable ".
So who gets to decide the "accepted narrative" or "more probable"? I assume it's the news media, but we know how reliable that can be.
In the case of JFK what is the more probable explanation; that Oswald did it alone, or that there were multiple gunmen?
Put another way is the multiple gunmen the conspiracy or is Oswald the conspiracy?
Or because we have a "viable" alternative are they both conspiracies?
So who gets to decide the "accepted narrative" or "more probable"? I assume it's the news media, but we know how reliable that can be.
In the case of JFK what is the more probable explanation; that Oswald did it alone, or that there were multiple gunmen?
Put another way is the multiple gunmen the conspiracy or is Oswald the conspiracy?
Or because we have a "viable" alternative are they both conspiracies?






