Asian Fever

C36 Merged thread, everything goes here

Who/where/why will be the first victim ?


  • Total voters
    27
  • Poll closed .

morementum

Member
Aug 22, 2012
789
13
18
changed?

Been out of the "loop" for a long time....and heard that from a "legal? aspect....our favorite sport may be in danger....

Is communicating with an SP (phone,email,text) still legal?

Any input is appreciated.
After nearly 9 years as a member of the board, and this is your first post - you put some real credibility into being "out of the loop for a long time"! :clap2:
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,653
828
113
Bill C-36 first victim........

O.K. first victim our rights and freedoms to how we amuse ourselves....etc.

But who, where and why will the first real victim of this nonsense be.......and let's face it people charged under this legislation are victims, if only of political ambition.
 

take8easy

Well-known member
Jul 27, 2014
4,699
1,135
113
You should add 'Conservatives' or .. 'Govt Of Canada' in there too.

After all they are the ones who are not going to stop fucking others.
 

westwoody

Well-known member
Jun 10, 2004
7,345
6,320
113
Westwood
Toronto for maximum media exposure. After all everything that happens in Toronto gets national coverage despite nobody outside TO giving a shit.

It will be a pooner because catching a filthy pervert makes LE feel good. Probably in a car with a baby seat for extra indignation by female reporter/newscaster. His wife will be interviewed and say this addiction to prostitutes is tearing their family apart.

Stupid because he will do everything wrong. He will bargain for specifics in texts which will be reprinted in the Globe and Mail and CBC. He will pay with credit card or from account he shares with wife. He will be answering a fake ad on bp.

Oh yeah, a year from now the guy will be acquitted but our fuckwad media will not report it. Meanwhile his life will be ruined.
 

vancity_cowboy

hard riding member
Jan 27, 2008
5,491
7
38
on yer ignore list
greater vancouver and greater toronto, asian micros and their clients, stings, managing sex workers on student or holiday visas - 'striking a blow against human sex trafficking!'

they already have the establishments picked out and surveilled - and they're 'ready to raid' on the morning of the 6th

they'll go for the best headlines, and human sex trafficking is as good as it gets :nod:
 

westwoody

Well-known member
Jun 10, 2004
7,345
6,320
113
Westwood
^ Cops always have lists of people they can fuck up when they need media exposure.

Bikers, hookers, alleged gang members, businessmen they don't like...they bring a tv crew along, fuck the guy up on camera, and look like they are "fighting crime". Usually happens when there is something bad about the cops in the news.
 

badbadboy

Well-known member
Nov 2, 2006
9,548
300
83
In Lust Mostly
It will be at a Bricks and Mortar Asian Micro or R n T.

Just to prove their point about human trafficking, downtrodden immigrants yadda yadda yadda.

Not in my wildest dreams will this episode in Canadian Law ever spill over to the Independents at their own private incall.
 

*emmanuelle

Victoria, B.C.
Aug 1, 2008
818
19
18
I really wish you guys would stop posting so many sensationalized, fear-mongering titles on here :( :( :(


edit: Looks like the thread is now merged into a mega thread. Thanks mods! That title was really unnecessarily dramatic :)
 

Riza

Filipina MILF
Jun 3, 2013
1,294
1,021
113
Richmond incall
riza.ca
Also I must say thanks Emmanuelle, I am actually thinking of taking the next month or two off and going away on holidays. I will be happy when January or February rolls around and everyone figures out LE are going to carry on as normal. Maybe they will crack down on the out of country workers on student or visitors visa, oh hold on, that's been illegal all along so I guess that won't change any. Maybe they will invest millions into staking out the 100's or 1,000's of independents in the city at their privates workspaces to possibly catch them exchanging money for sex out the front of their house and they can see them mouthing the works or using some type of enhancing microphone. Oh, I think they would probably have to catch us in the act (I'm not a expert so this is just a guess) but they could run to the court house and get a writ to enter my premises and "catch us", oh but wait, its just my handyman that I paid to fix my toilet and thought his plumbers crack was so hot I just couldn't keep my hands off him and the sex was for fun. Hmmmm

I think that the new year will bring some stability to the situation and once all the dust has settled everyone will return to the norm. If you don't see my ad up on any of the websites that are going to be shut down at anytime I am in Philippines enjoying the sun and will see you in February.

:fear::doh:
 

Hardlover

Member
Mar 5, 2012
115
0
16
Did the SC fucked us over?

Even up to last year things were going fine and it was business as usual until SC came up with some legalize decision and we all started rejoicing. But now that I think of it all it kinda got backfired as everything went down hill after that.

Maybe we were just better off the way we were.......
 

Lo-ki

Well-known member
Jul 18, 2011
3,990
2,566
113
Check your closet..:)
Sometimes I wished the larger society would just mined there own business.
 

vancity_cowboy

hard riding member
Jan 27, 2008
5,491
7
38
on yer ignore list
Our society seems to cycle between socially loose and socially restrictive on a 50-60 year cycle. Things were on getting looser from the 1890's through the 1920's then tightened up until they started to loosen again in the early 1960's & began to tighten again (though slowed by the rise of the internet) in the 1990's. That governments today are leaning back towards morality laws versus secular laws based on science isn't surprising. Luckily our Supreme court seldom (but not never) makes decisions for political reasons & we'll just need to ride this out.

The people who passed this new law are not evil and for the most part really do believe it is the right law based on their world view. And this is the type of laws on all kinds of issues we will continue to get from them until their world view changes or people with a different world view replace them. But they are just a reflection of where our larger society is at today.
to add to peaceguy's post, it's not just our society. here's a story from poland...

Town Bans Winnie the Pooh for Being Half-Naked, Sexually "Dubious"
7:24 PM PST 11/22/2014 by Ryan Gajewski

The character is "wholly inappropriate for children," according to one legislator

Here's some news that would definitely lead Winnie the Pooh to exclaim, "Oh, bother."

Lawmakers in the small town of Tuszyn, Poland, have voted to ban the honey-loving character from representing a playground due to the anthropomorphic bear's lack of a clear gender identity and a propensity for going pants-less.

Officials at a council meeting claimed that Winnie the Pooh is of "dubious sexuality" and is "inappropriately dressed" to be around children, given that the bear is "half-naked," according to the Croatian Times.

"The problem with that bear is it doesn't have a complete wardrobe," said council person Ryszard Cichy, 46. "It is half-naked, which is wholly inappropriate for children."

Another official said that Pooh Bear "doesn't wear underpants because it doesn’t have a sex. It's a hermaphrodite."

Council person Hanna Jachimska criticized Winnie-the-Pooh author A.A. Milne for having "cut his [Pooh's] testicles off with a razor blade because he had a problem with his identity."

It had not been decided which character would instead represent the playground.


http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/town-bans-winnie-pooh-being-751513
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,653
828
113
Sometimes I wished the larger society would just mined there own business.
Are you blaming this mess on the larger members in society ?




Remember it was an SP that brought this to the courts in response to laws that maybe weren't that bad, in hindsight.
 

Blonde Brynn

Member
Sep 4, 2012
239
0
16
Remember it was an SP that brought this to the courts in response to laws that maybe weren't that bad, in hindsight.
The laws don't seem bad to you in hindsight. Because you weren't facing police harassment. You weren't getting arrested and forced out of your workplace for having the audacity to work in a group for safety. Neither was I, but plenty of women in more conservative jurisdictions were, so let's not blame Tracy Bedford for standing up for these women.
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,653
828
113
The laws don't seem bad to you in hindsight. Because you weren't facing police harassment. You weren't getting arrested and forced out of your workplace for having the audacity to work in a group for safety. Neither was I, but plenty of women in more conservative jurisdictions were, so let's not blame Tracy Bedford for standing up for these women.

Love the way you emphasize "you" in your response, in particular since you know nothing about me. Based on your age, I was involved in this industry before you were born, in fact some of the ladies I helped out of this industry have kids your age. I am not the only person in this forum or in the media that has expressed the same sentiment. In fact Bedfords' lawyer made a comment along vein. I applaud her for stepping up and coming out to fight the good fight for the ladies in the industry, but maybe it was the right battle at the wrong time.
 

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,653
828
113
So, if others think the timing is wrong, the average person should allow themselves to be punished by an unconstitutional law? That is, at its core, what your statement advises.
That's what you got out of it ? Thought you were smarter than that.
 
Last edited:

Sonny

Senior Member
Sep 12, 2004
3,734
218
63
I applaud her for stepping up and coming out to fight the good fight for the ladies in the industry, but maybe it was the right battle at the wrong time.
It is always the right battle when folks are put in danger because of unconstitutional laws; the outcome of that battle was a striking down of those laws.
What is wrong is that we have the Harper government whose backward view germinated the outrageous replacement we have now.
A Liberal or NDP government would not have introduced such a bill.

Solution? Work very hard to defeat the Conservatives in 2015.
And push the opposition parties to vow to repeal this atrocious new law.

Write Kathleen Wynne, premier of Ontario, to refer this law to the Ontario Supreme Court.
She, as a woman, a lesbian, and as a married gay, should understand marginalization and inequity.
 
Last edited:

uncleg

Well-known member
Jul 25, 2006
5,653
828
113
It is always the right battle when folks are put in danger because of unconstitutional laws; the outcome of that battle was a striking down of those laws.
What is wrong is that we have the Harper government whose backward view germinated the outrageous replacement we have now.
A Liberal or NDP government would not have introduced such a bill.


Bingo.........................you got it.
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts