Shit storm to ensue in 5 4 3 2 ...Theres no proof. Why do we believe the women and not him?
He waived his 5th amendment rights in an (informal) non-prosecution agreement and admitted to drugging women before having sex without their consent.Theres no proof. Why do we believe the women and not him?
He waived his 5th amendment rights in an (informal) non-prosecution agreement and admitted to drugging women before having sex without their consent.
He got off on the definition of a technicality, not because there's any question about his guilt. I wouldn't be so quick to give him the benefit of any doubt.
Are you fucking kidding?This is not true, get your facts straight
Why do these women wait 30 years to say something? Out of the 60 women or whatever, you would think at least one would have gone to the police or media when it happened. Thats like saying someone you know steels your car and then 30 years later you go to the police and say hey this guy stole my car 30 years ago. Wheres the proof! So is it guilty before proving someone is innocent nowadays? If he was white he would have gotten no jail time period.
Or par for the course while riding the gilded carriage of injustice.And that, boys and girls, is the epitome of miscarriage of justice.