The comments on the previous page about taking care in communications with SP's is valid for the future. The ruling on Friday from the Supreme Court about privacy and unreasonable search and seizure, spilled over to reveal that the police have been able to just go to your ISP and get any information they wanted about your internet activity. No more, or I would expect Shaw could be sued for a significant amount for revealing your private information. It was also stated on TV that your contacts were part of the information given away. And that likely goes as far as even your emails. So some people on this topic have stated opinions that Bill C-36 would not be rigourously enforced, but it is evident that the collection of information to prosecute you for buying sex could simply start at Shaw's front door, with information that you had been in contact with an SP and a copy of her contact list and the communications with her clients. She would be safe from prosecution as she had the right to sell sex, but you would be easily prosecuted because you were shown to be buying it. Nothing more might be needed.
This Harper guy and his cronies will stop at nothing to turn this country into a pure state in their own purist views, and we need to be thankful that we have a Supreme Court that is taking the interests of the average Canadian to heart. If you go back to the first challenge in the Supreme Court of the communications street law, the Supreme Court stated it was unconstitutional, but used the Not withstanding provision in the Constitution to declare it valid, one of the contribution factors to the death of so many prostitutes. That law is back again in C-36.
If C-36 makes it through the mill, I really hope the group in Toronto who challenged the old law gets revived and goes at it again.
This Harper guy and his cronies will stop at nothing to turn this country into a pure state in their own purist views, and we need to be thankful that we have a Supreme Court that is taking the interests of the average Canadian to heart. If you go back to the first challenge in the Supreme Court of the communications street law, the Supreme Court stated it was unconstitutional, but used the Not withstanding provision in the Constitution to declare it valid, one of the contribution factors to the death of so many prostitutes. That law is back again in C-36.
If C-36 makes it through the mill, I really hope the group in Toronto who challenged the old law gets revived and goes at it again.
