I don't know if that's true but that's beside the point for me. Personally I think the best use of the money would be to subsidize clean technologies but the only reason they don't do it is that they would lose even more votes with that. At the end of the day something has to be done and this is better than nothing
it is like doing nothing
it's not reducing emissions, the only thing that reduces emissions is recessions, lack of activity in the economy
carbon taxes don't change behaviour, specially on basic needs, which is what heating your house, water, electricity, gas for cars, moving products, farming, ect is
to change behaviour, you need to make it so much worse, kinda like the reason why the drug addicts aren't stopping, when you give them what they want, drugs
and the rebates are a joke, go look at what someone uses for just heating their home with natural gas, then add in the gas for a vehicle, then add what all the other companies add to their product
prices to pay for the tax, or do you think it's not added? then look at the idiotic amount you get
and don't forget you don't get the GST back, which is added on top the tax, just like with the GAS TAX, TAX on TAX
then go buy your 15,000 heat pump with that few hundred
then a electric car, then put more insulation in your shit box wood house, with new windows, doors, never fly anywhere again
walk/bike to work, 20 miles one way, while carrying your groceries, kid with his hockey gear
you're right, nothing is better than something that would work
LIKE STOP BRINGING IN 1-2 MILLION A YEAR FROM THE PLACES WHERE EMISSIONS ARE HIGHER TO ADD TO OURS
CHINA/INDIA
OR WHERE THEY'RE LOWER TO A HIGHER PER CAPITA LIKE CANADA WHICH WILL INCREASE THE TOTAL, CAUSE EMISSIONS DON'T RESPECT OUR BORDER, THEY VERY LIBERAL LIKE THAT
CARBON TAXES HAVEN'T DONE ANYTHING BUT MAKE YOU POORER
REAL EMISSION REDUCTIONS REQUIRE GETTING RID OF THE SOURCE
PEOPLE
OR LIKE THE GUY FROM THE UAE GO BACK TO LIVING IN CAVES