....article has had sections redacted by warrantless court order.
By Justice J. Taylor of the British Columbia Supreme Court.
On August 11th, 2023, Justice Michael Tammen of the Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed my lawsuit against magistrate Grant Taylor and the Supreme Court of British Columbia.
Despite hearing no evidence, the judge concluded:
that I disclosed no reasonable claim
that my suit was unnecessary, scandalous, vexatious or frivolous
that I abused court process
How did the judge come to these conclusions?
Justice Michael Tammen claimed the Judiciary has absolute immunity.
https://danielnagase.substack.com/p/a-criminal-surprise
In my own experience. Travesty. Cousin's grandson incarcerated since 2001. In a crime scene with multiple DNA fragments of an undisclosed number of persons. Prosecutor involked case law that incomplete fragments of DNA couldn't be allowed as evidence. Jury wasn't allowed to know that multiple persons came and went to and from the crime scene. Only the youth's whole DNA presented as evidence. Defence lawyer didn't complain. Jury convicted the youth. Judge closed the case satisfied Court followed the law. Family didn't complain. Counciled by defence lawyer in 2001 that evidence such as PCR (polymerised chain reaction) to complete fragments of DNA and/or witnesses coming forward must be found that lead to a different person and conviction secured to release the youth.
