2021: The year NASA got serious about going to the Moon

wetnose

Well-known member
Mar 23, 2003
2,077
481
83
South Vancouver
https://arstechnica.com/science/202...p-award-is-a-watershed-moment-in-spaceflight/

https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/...a-picks-spacex-to-land-next-americans-on-moon

"Consider the status quo. The large Space Launch System rocket under development by NASA will be able to launch 95 metric tons into low Earth orbit. NASA and its contractors, led by Boeing, will be able to build one a year. The expendable vehicle will launch one payload, at a cost of about $2 billion per mission, and then drop into the ocean.

In terms of lift capacity, the vehicles are similar. SpaceX's Starship and Super Heavy should be able to put about 100 tons into low Earth orbit. However, SpaceX is already capable of building one Starship a month, and the plan is to reuse each booster and spacecraft dozens of times. Imagine the kind of space program NASA could have with the capacity to launch 100 tons into orbit every two weeks—instead of a single annual mission—for $2 billion a year. Seriously, pause a moment and really think about that."

For perspective, the Apollo lander could only carry 1 ton.
 
Last edited:

80watts

Well-known member
May 20, 2004
3,340
1,264
113
Victoria
I think its great, but you will need alot more going into low earth orbit, then high earth orbit and then moon orbit, and from there the moon. Its just like building gas stations on a long high way. To get to the end, you need several stops to get gas and supplies. Along the way you will need repair facilities too if you want the end product to be self sustaining.
 
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts