"Lol...you went back 12 years for this one."
They keep losing elections. They haven't won one in almost 12 years.
They keep losing elections. They haven't won one in almost 12 years.
I have given members of my sales team 2 chances to fix some of the fictional works that are expense reports. First is denied with a "fix this and resubmit", second is same but "do this again and your next time we'll be having a more difficult conversation".I want to make a remark about the entitlement issue seen in these recent posts. It is a wide spread issue throughout the world, not just in Canada. I see it in all political parties once they are in power no matter what the level - federal, provincial and municipal. I also see it as a big problem in our private sector. As part of my job, I have made policies to my subordinates about having to be careful with expenses. I have also tried to push this to the wider company. And from what I have seen it doesn't matter their politics. I have seen left wingers try to stay in the most expensive hotels and right wingers guzzle down the most expensive wines. I do not approve those expenses when they come to me. And I think that in private business we need to respect the shareholders. And we very much need to hold not only our elected officials to standards but also any sort of public official or employee. All of us work too hard for our money to put up with this. But let me ask everyone, do you fight this sort of behaviour at work? Or do you just complain? I for one, at least, take a firm hand to control my reports and myself. We all need to do that.
And until the 2015 federal election, the federal Liberals had not won an election in the preceding 11 years. Exactly what nonsensical point are you trying to make? The preceding 11 years prior to the 2015 election does not mean the Libs had no chance in 2015 (as evidenced by their win). In the same token, the Libs' three election win starting in 2015 says nothing about what may or may not happen in the next election.They keep losing elections. They haven't won one in almost 12 years.
I'll type slower.And until the 2015 federal election, the federal Liberals had not won an election in the preceding 11 years. Exactly what nonsensical point are you trying to make? The preceding 11 years prior to the 2015 election does not mean the Libs had no chance in 2015 (as evidenced by their win). In the same token, the Libs' three election win starting in 2015 says nothing about what may or may not happen in the next election.
No. I get it, you think you're doing that - but you're not. Saying nothing for the fact that you posted a decade old article/tweet/whatever, unprompted - to prove what point? I get it, you prefer the federal Libs, there's plenty of comments here about Liberals wasting taxpayer money. But, your posts demonstrate an infantile mind. This notion that "they did it too" (i.e. the infantile response) is completely missing the point. In other words, Conservatives wasting taxpayer money is not some justification for Liberals to waste taxpayer money - and that is what you are doing. Now, whether you have the mental capacity to actually know (or the intellectual honesty to admit) that that is what you are doing is, of course, another matter all together.I was responding to a poster who took me to task for going back to when the Conservatives last held power for examples of the Conservatives waste.
Biggest brain has spoken with all the humility they could muster.No. I get it, you think you're doing that - but you're not. Saying nothing for the fact that you posted a decade old article/tweet/whatever, unprompted - to prove what point? I get it, you prefer the federal Libs, there's plenty of comments here about Liberals wasting taxpayer money. But, your posts demonstrate an infantile mind. This notion that "they did it too" (i.e. the infantile response) is completely missing the point. In other words, Conservatives wasting taxpayer money is not some justification for Liberals to waste taxpayer money - and that is what you are doing. Now, whether you have the mental capacity to actually know (or the intellectual honesty to admit) that that is what you are doing is, of course, another matter all together.
LOL! There's that infantile mindset! LOLBiggest brain has spoken with all the humility they could muster.
Your name calling is the only infantile thing I've seen from you. It comes off as sociopathic blather insted of making *any* point at all. Try actually saying something besides 'youre a poopie head' it gets boring.LOL! There's that infantile mindset! LOL
Biggest brain has spoken with all the humility they could muster.
Seriously mate, you jump in, for what appears to be the sole purpose of leveling an insult at me. And now your whining that I responded in kind. Give it a rest and grow up!Your name calling is the only infantile thing I've seen from you. It comes off as sociopathic blather insted of making *any* point at all. Try actually saying something besides 'youre a poopie head' it gets boring.
These are trolls. Its what they do. You feed them, respond to them and I am sure they jerk off to it. This thread has so many I lost count. When I hit the un ignore button half of this thread reappears.Seriously mate, you jump in, for what appears to be the sole purpose of leveling an insult at me. And now your whining that I responded in kind. Give it a rest and grow up!
NDP MP Laurel Collins.Perfidious, off-putting opposition leader with high school education mansplains, gets it wrong, then gets owned by a girl.
This isn't your father's conservative party.
https://x.com/Laurel_BC/status/1777803344029032753
But is what she said correct? Even clowns can be correct. And boy, you like to attack the messenger! Lots of vitriol there.NDP MP Laurel Collins.
Laurel has a degree in "Human Security and Peacebuilding".
No, I did not make that up.
Apparently it's a thing.
Also did some work for the UN giving away other people's money ( an NDP specialty)
Laurel was on Victoria City Council for one year.
That makes her qualified to be an NDP federal MP.
She's never done an honest days work in her life.
She's a leech.
She has no business "explaining" anything to anyone.
SHE'S A FUCKING CLOWN!!!
But is what she said correct? Even clowns can be correct. And boy, you like to attack the messenger! Lots of vitriol there.
Is what she said correct?But is what she said correct? Even clowns can be correct. And boy, you like to attack the messenger! Lots of vitriol there.
Get some help.Yeah, she owned him so easily it was embarrassing.
It's interesting that the previous poster didn't acknowledge Poilievre's complete lack of education, his complete lack of any real world work experience, nor his ignorance on an issue that he wants to run an election on.
Nope. He goes full-on misogynist from the get-go.
Which I guess is appropriate because Poilievre put misogynistic tags in his videos for 5 years to attract the Alex Jones types.
But is what she said correct?
You are 100% incorrect.She was 100% correct. Poilievre was 100% wrong, befitting a man with less education than a Starbucks barista.






