USA Political Thread 2024

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drjohn

Banned
Dec 26, 2020
680
398
63
The president nominates persons for the supreme court. So he set it up. Also he nominated 3 people, which is 1/3 of the supreme court.

As by overthrow, he tried to get votes changed, wanted his vice president to turn over the election in Congress on Jan 6. All that shit that happened on Jan 6, wouldn't of happened without some kind of approval from Trump. Trump has alot of guys falling on their swords, in order for the blame not to fall on him.
Fake electors going to Washington, to vote in congress.
The question you should ask yourself is what if Trump did succeed in overthrowing the election on Jan 6.
Come on, think about it, it was all just a fucking joke to see if it could be done. Nobody thinks that. The only conclusion is that he Trump tried to overthrow the election like some two bit third world dictator. And he failed.

You need to think in terms of black and white and not grey. The grey is beat around the bush, don't tell the whole truth, tell half truths, and outright lie as long as it can confuse the issue.

So Dr John, what was Trump trying to accomplish after he knew he lost the election in November?
The Ass-wipe should of congratulated Biden, wished him the best of luck, and tell Americans that he believes in the power of democracy.... Yada, Yada, Yada....

Trump has shown that he is a piece of shit disguised as a human being. Making remarks about court clerks family? How low will he go? Even warned by the judge not to do so. Its not a political ploy.

Trump lacks common decency.

But that is not the only problem. There are alot of Americans that love what Trump is doing. And that should scare any decent human being.
I'm pretty sure that you don't know what "rigged" means.

Trump nominated 3 people for the SCOTUS.

They were vetted and then a vote was taken in the Senate.

All three of them were approved in this way.

That's how it works.

That's how it has always worked.

That's how every other President has nominated people and that's how their nominees are confirmed.

So...NOT RIGGED!!!!

As far as trying to overturn the election, a lot of interesting theories and accusations.

Nothing proven in court

I understand that there is a case pending against him.

Should be interesting.

I guess he could be convicted and end up in jail.

Or, he could also be re-elected in November.

Either way, you will still be afflicted with the TDS.

That's not in doubt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cock Throppled

carvesg

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2010
1,275
1,354
113
I'll give it to Drjohn that Scotus was not rigged by trump .

It was through foul play by Senate leader Mitch McConnell in 2016 by holding the nomination of a new justice (Merrick Garland well regarded conservative judge but too level headed for the far right branch in the Republican party). McConnell's excuse was ...that because it was an election year the nomination had to be done by the up coming president....giving trump an extra nomination during his term when RBG died in September 2020 (4 months before the end of trump's term) the old bird could not hold on for 4 more months . Neil Gorsuch has only McConnell to thank for his seat .

Shitty manœuvre that will be used in the future by Democrats to deny Scotus nominees and maybe even other strategic positions....you never know how that precedent will be used in the future and come to haunt the Republicans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldshark

thevalleydude

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2022
428
367
63
. The only people who back him are the Brainwashed MAGA goofs, who’s bogus evangelical religion has wrung any decency out of them since they partnered up with Fox News. This guy is the ultimate image of the Antichrist they have been blubbering about for decades and they worship him, how fuckin stupid can you get. You need to climb out of the disinformation bubble and get some fresh air it’s rotting your brain.🤷🏻‍♂️
So 50% of Americans are "brainwashed MAGA goofs with a bogus evangelical religion"? There is absolutely no other reason people might want to vote for him? Immigration, economy, crime, foreign relations, wars in Ukraine and Israel being funded with taxpayers money....no other reason?

Your astute analysis of American politics is very insightful and impressive. You are so much smarter than them because you watch MSNBC, the View, Stephen Colbert and read the New York Times and Washington Post....they would never spread misinformation........or would they? Ever stop to consider who is actually in the disinformation bubble? Probably not. ...no...definitely not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dare.devil

thevalleydude

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2022
428
367
63
I'll give it to Drjohn that Scotus was not rigged by trump .

It was through foul play by Senate leader Mitch McConnell in 2016 by holding the nomination of a new justice (Merrick Garland well regarded conservative judge but too level headed for the far right branch in the Republican party). McConnell's excuse was ...that because it was an election year the nomination had to be done by the up coming president....giving trump an extra nomination during his term when RBG died in September 2020 (4 months before the end of trump's term) the old bird could not hold on for 4 more months . Neil Gorsuch has only McConnell to thank for his seat .

Shitty manœuvre that will be used in the future by Democrats to deny Scotus nominees and maybe even other strategic positions....you never know how that precedent will be used in the future and come to haunt the Republicans.
Merrick Garland is a moderate Liberal who has been on the Democratic Party's shorlist for a Supreme Court posting since 1997. It was Bill Clinton who appointed him to the DC Circuit in 1995. According to Politico, what you would consider a reliable source, he was NOT a conservative.
 

carvesg

Well-known member
Feb 2, 2010
1,275
1,354
113
Merrick Garland is a moderate Liberal who has been on the Democratic Party's shorlist for a Supreme Court posting since 1997. It was Bill Clinton who appointed him to the DC Circuit in 1995. According to Politico, what you would consider a reliable source, he was NOT a conservative.
If you go further back about Garland you will see that he has always been a moderate conservative. The far right qualify that as liberal which is quite far from the truth as Lindsey Graham months prior was hinting for his selection ....but even so....it was not McConnell's to make .

As for Politico being a reliable source ...once again it all depends who writes the article. I never trust any source entirely ...never did never will. Ex. National Post yes good source but an article written by Conrad Black becomes fish wrapping paper 98% of the time , which stinks 2 days later
 

overdone

Banned
Apr 26, 2007
1,828
442
83
So 50% of Americans are "brainwashed MAGA goofs with a bogus evangelical religion"?
no, basically almost more people don't vote as those who do

if he really had that kind of support he'd have won in landslides both times, he didn't even win the popular vote

so the brainwashed number who actually did vote for the orangutan is more like 25% or less, cause there are some who will just not vote Dem down there, even when they

put up a POS like Trump

just like here with Liberals, haha

although in the U.S. they actively go out of their way to prevent people they don't want voting to have the ability
 

MRGREEN

Lost in Translation
Jul 7, 2003
989
604
93
Winnipeg
perb.ca
This makes Twitter
So 50% of Americans are "brainwashed MAGA goofs with a bogus evangelical religion"? There is absolutely no other reason people might want to vote for him? Immigration, economy, crime, foreign relations, wars in Ukraine and Israel being funded with taxpayers money....no other reason?

Your astute analysis of American politics is very insightful and impressive. You are so much smarter than them because you watch MSNBC, the View, Stephen Colbert and read the New York Times and Washington Post....they would never spread misinformation........or would they? Ever stop to consider who is actually in the disinformation bubble? Probably not. ...no...definitely not.
More like 1/3 hard core types. Anti-vaxxers , flat earthers, anti-science and affraid of everything types.They are gone and are never coming back. Tyranny of the minority.
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldshark

Cock Throppled

Well-known member
Oct 1, 2003
5,066
1,010
113
Upstairs
I'm wondering if any of the Trump haters here have ever tried to verify what CNN, The Wapo, NY Times or Democrats say? Have any of you ever bothered to seek out other opinions, viewpoints or narratives that might not fit with what you've been told from left-leaning media and politicians? And no, I don't mean Fox news, which I personally have never watched.

There are foreign media, on-line sources and right-leaning media that often show that big stories the Dems spread are often half-truths, selective quotes, gossip or unconfirmed. But, by far the favoured method is to simply ignore, or not report whatever doesn't fit their agenda. Issues of race and immigration are notorious for that approach.
 

angry anderson

Well-known member
Nov 8, 2014
1,902
2,189
113
I'm wondering if any of the Trump haters here have ever tried to verify what CNN, The Wapo, NY Times or Democrats say? Have any of you ever bothered to seek out other opinions, viewpoints or narratives that might not fit with what you've been told from left-leaning media and politicians? And no, I don't mean Fox news, which I personally have never watched.

There are foreign media, on-line sources and right-leaning media that often show that big stories the Dems spread are often half-truths, selective quotes, gossip or unconfirmed. But, by far the favoured method is to simply ignore, or not report whatever doesn't fit their agenda. Issues of race and immigration are notorious for that approach.
 

angry anderson

Well-known member
Nov 8, 2014
1,902
2,189
113
I'm wondering if any of the Trump haters here have ever tried to verify what CNN, The Wapo, NY Times or Democrats say? Have any of you ever bothered to seek out other opinions, viewpoints or narratives that might not fit with what you've been told from left-leaning media and politicians? And no, I don't mean Fox news, which I personally have never watched.

There are foreign media, on-line sources and right-leaning media that often show that big stories the Dems spread are often half-truths, selective quotes, gossip or unconfirmed. But, by far the favoured method is to simply ignore, or not report whatever doesn't fit their agenda. Issues of race and immigration are notorious for that approach.
 

Drjohn

Banned
Dec 26, 2020
680
398
63
People talk about the "Swamp" in Washington.

The sleazy, greasy and corrupt politicians that inhabit the Swamp.

Hilary Clinton personifies that type of swamp dweller.

Her main claim to fame?

She's Bill Clinton's wife.

She parlayed that nugget of notoriety into a run at the Presidentcy of the US.

Turns out she was more hated than Donald Trump.

Who knew?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cock Throppled

LLLurkJ2

Keep on peeping
Jul 6, 2015
1,197
996
113
Vancouver
So 50% of Americans are "brainwashed MAGA goofs with a bogus evangelical religion"? There is absolutely no other reason people might want to vote for him? Immigration, economy, crime, foreign relations, wars in Ukraine and Israel being funded with taxpayers money....no other reason?

Your astute analysis of American politics is very insightful and impressive. You are so much smarter than them because you watch MSNBC, the View, Stephen Colbert and read the New York Times and Washington Post....they would never spread misinformation........or would they? Ever stop to consider who is actually in the disinformation bubble? Probably not. ...no...definitely not.
Yes because hes offered a concrete platform to adress all these issues and is not just blowing smoke up evryones asses. Thats why hes selling the bibles and the NFTs and whatever other litteral pieces of shit to his supporters. Hes like the shopping chanel rolled into jim jones rolled into reggie rich all in one.

If Trump gets re-elected h'ell just pardon himself and it will be viewed as the most corrupt event in American politcal history. All the other stuff nothing will happen just like the firtst term. No wall , no immigration reduction, didnt do anything to China or North Korea, didnt reduce crime economy was worse, etc..
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldshark

LLLurkJ2

Keep on peeping
Jul 6, 2015
1,197
996
113
Vancouver
I'm wondering if any of the Trump haters here have ever tried to verify what CNN, The Wapo, NY Times or Democrats say? Have any of you ever bothered to seek out other opinions, viewpoints or narratives that might not fit with what you've been told from left-leaning media and politicians? And no, I don't mean Fox news, which I personally have never watched.

There are foreign media, on-line sources and right-leaning media that often show that big stories the Dems spread are often half-truths, selective quotes, gossip or unconfirmed. But, by far the favoured method is to simply ignore, or not report whatever doesn't fit their agenda. Issues of race and immigration are notorious for that approach.
As much as youve checked the veracity of 'alternative news'
 
  • Like
Reactions: oldshark

thevalleydude

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2022
428
367
63
If you go further back about Garland you will see that he has always been a moderate conservative. The far right qualify that as liberal which is quite far from the truth as Lindsey Graham months prior was hinting for his selection ....but even so....it was not McConnell's to make .

As for Politico being a reliable source ...once again it all depends who writes the article. I never trust any source entirely ...never did never will. Ex. National Post yes good source but an article written by Conrad Black becomes fish wrapping paper 98% of the time , which stinks 2 days later
If he was on Bill Clintons shortlist then he was actually a Democrat 30 years ago. That is far enough back.
If you go further back about Garland you will see that he has always been a moderate conservative. The far right qualify that as liberal which is quite far from the truth as Lindsey Graham months prior was hinting for his selection ....but even so....it was not McConnell's to make .

As for Politico being a reliable source ...once again it all depends who writes the article. I never trust any source entirely ...never did never will. Ex. National Post yes good source but an article written by Conrad Black becomes fish wrapping paper 98% of the time , which stinks 2 days later
What does Conrad Black have to do with anything? That was not who I sourced it from. And going back over 30 years in history for a person on Bill Clintons radar is far enough to determine a persons political leanings at this point.
 
Jul 22, 2019
39
21
8
People talk about the "Swamp" in Washington.

The sleazy, greasy and corrupt politicians that inhabit the Swamp.

Hilary Clinton personifies that type of swamp dweller.

Her main claim to fame?

She's Bill Clinton's wife.

She parlayed that nugget of notoriety into a run at the Presidentcy of the US.

Turns out she was more hated than Donald Trump.

Who knew?
You must have forgotten the part where Hillary got 3 million more votes than Donald.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ashley Madison
Vancouver Escorts