Is it? If there’s a link to the provider’s ad or Web site, the donation will be listed there 9/10 times. It’ll also encourage potential clients to ACTUALLY GO TO THE WEB SITE AND READ IT *gasp*
Draft of review template, comments and suggestions welcomed.
- Thread starter Fred Zed
- Start date
I don’t think cleanliness and appearance are the same at all. You could prob just get rid of cleanliness because I feel like if there are issues, that’s the kind of thing someone would put in comments. The reason I included it though and with the “showered/unshowered” answer is that some reviewers will say a provider is “dirty” or “lacking hygiene” if they have any hair except on their head, or if their genitals have any kind of smell-which is natural. All that matters is if they showered.
I also think boundaries are super important to replace “services available” because I honestly allow different services based on a client’s cleanliness. I offer bbbj and BLS...IF the client showers thoroughly; and I make that clear when I’m taking a booking and someone asks for my “menu”. If a client doesn’t use my mouthwash I’m less likely to want to do DFK. Etc. I know a lot of providers are also like this!
Last edited:
I mean, fair. The thing is some providers want to keep their prices private because they may vary from person to person based on the amount of labour that has to be put into a session (for example some clients are rougher, want PSE, pay for extras, etc) and so rates can definitely be quite ambiguous. If a provider doesn't list their rates, I feel as though this might be the case.
so like
Provider's Name:
Agency / Indie:
Link to provider's ad or Web site:
Rate:
<250/h, 250-350/h, 350-450/h, >450/h
Appearance:
Looked like photos, photos were old or heavily edited, was not the same person as the photos
Cleanliness: Showered / unshowered
Incall: Luxurious, comfortable, adequate, humble, run down
Service style (select all that apply): Sultry, silly, ravenous, coy, disinterested, robotic, under the influence, engaging, unfiltered, spunky, adventurous, playful, flirty, etc (feel free to add)
Boundaries:
Outlined boundaries clearly before session and explained that they can change, did not outline boundaries clearly before session or explain that they can change
Satisfied with experience: Satisfied, feeling okay, disappointed
Comments:
------
I feel like that's super concise and still fairly provider friendly while giving clients the info they need. *shrug*
OK, how about you step-up first, and only after yours are verified for accuracy will others consent to sharing all of those personal details.
It should already be understood as a foregone conclusion that those a lot hotter than you are will get better service at 7-Eleven, at Timmys, and from providers here on PERB.
Those who aren't, won't predictably get better service.
Your sense OF what sort of service the last person rated based on human nature is not relevant to the big picture for anyone else other than you.
....but that's sometimes not the case. In fact, for the very reasons you're detailing is a good reason 'why' it would be a good idea. I understand that there are "natural reasons" for the YMMV factor. But there are SPs would claim to be 'non-judgmental', so the burden would be on them to see how 'judgmental' they claim they are not.
That said, I'm not suggesting we all give our exact names, our exact age, our exact race, where we work, what's our social insurance number, and what we had for breakfast this morning.....just ballpark idea as to the type of person writing a review.
I could see it were we in an arena where, say, it was a high school class promised that they would be graded on a true curve, with as many A's as E's, and as many B's as D's... and with, say, 60% of everyone destined to get a "C".
But psychologically, you are already in an arena where the vast majority of all reviews will be favorable (and it is a self-fulfilling prophecy by PERB, because they put the reviews here on display to effect that outcome)... so the best thing you can do to optimize the chance that you and your next SP 'connect' spiritually right AT the same level from the get-go, is to survey numerous reviews of hers and numerous ads and online posts of hers.
Mathematically speaking, as the number of unique reviews you read about subject Y approaches X... the less important will be the specifics of any one reviewer (won't matter if he was a mailman, or a milkman, or a bulldozer driver).
IF on the other hand you have but ONE review of someone, and had to make it, or break it, based on that one review... then it would make more sense to need a basis for that one person's qualifications for reviewing.
The stupid complaints on these boards by people who think "waaaaaaaaaaaaaay too many of the reviews are unbridled positive reviews" are FAR more numerous than are inappropriate reviews. They just can't seem to ram it through their heads that
A ) Most reviews are written by a man who recently had sex with an attractive woman
B ) Most PERB reviews are written by a man who spent a decent amount of time researching on PERB or elsewhere and then selected that woman based on details which mattered to him
C ) It IS sex... it isn't a new toaster from a company that guaranteed your toast wouldn't burn (there's gonna be some arousal - unlike with burnt toast)
D ) There is a giant 'margin for error' involved (even mediocre sex with a hot, young woman is a pleasure)
Of course there are handfuls of implied expectations (she will have the condoms, is prominent among them) (she will be sober and expecting sexual intimacy) (she will be available somewhat on time) ... which, if not met, quite often draw the written reviewed ire of the fine consumers of PERB... but aside from those black-n-white issues, it is already likely to be a pretty good experience going in.
Toss the boundaries and service style.
Some Sp's will have different boundaries for different clients, greek is one activity that comes to mind. I suggest there might be some clients that might resent being told something was out of bounds when they booked an Sp looking forward to a particular activity based on somebodies review.
Service style...again, YMMV. One persons silly is someone else's funky....
Some Sp's will have different boundaries for different clients, greek is one activity that comes to mind. I suggest there might be some clients that might resent being told something was out of bounds when they booked an Sp looking forward to a particular activity based on somebodies review.
Service style...again, YMMV. One persons silly is someone else's funky....
this is why I suggested:
Boundaries:
Outlined boundaries clearly before session and explained that they can change, did not outline boundaries clearly before session or explain that they can change
as for service style, yeah ymmv but everyone has a personality. Maybe it should be called “personality” instead of “service style”?
I think this is a bad idea as carriers may re-use numbers. I don't want my brand new number to show up here just because it used to belong to a SP.
Good SP's treasure their number and keep it when they switch carriers.
SP's with bad reviews change their number often in an attempt to not be connected with bad reviews.
Personally, I'm not a Fan of the Template .
But, if that helps new Members get their Bearings, so be it .
It's being given a Whirl already !
https://perb.cc/xenforo/threads/crystal-9630.290463/
Mr Q.
But, if that helps new Members get their Bearings, so be it .
It's being given a Whirl already !
https://perb.cc/xenforo/threads/crystal-9630.290463/
Mr Q.
Last edited:
A
Andrew69913
Maybe reviews, primarily of independents, are just irrelevant. If EVERYTHING is YMMV and the services and prices can change depending on mood or person, what's the point? Yes, I am aware this is a bit of an extreme statement, but the main problem seems to be some providers do NOT want specifics of their interactions to be publicized because it comes across as consent (i.e. well you DFK'd this other guy in his review, you should DFK me too). IMO this is a perfectly reasonable and viable position. Human beings are after all, just human beings with feelings, preferences, etc. On the other hand, this is a business, services for money, and people have a right to know where their money is going. There's a happy medium somewhere, and this template discussion is a great way to start. I would definitely use it and flesh out my experience in any comments section if required.
Great thread and alot of good points. I would like to see the age of SP as well ..Being in my mid 50s I prefer to see mature SPs which I can develop a better mental connection ..Its Not all about the sex for all of us ..Im sure lots of the younger gents dont want to see a SP thats not being honest about their age as well ..couple years is understandable but 10 is not ok ..
