Future of the World

Status
Not open for further replies.

80watts

Well-known member
May 20, 2004
3,342
1,266
113
Victoria
I'm not a union man, but union are needed to keep the business owners honest.

For the last 10 or so years the governments have been union busting, can't give you that, but we will give you that if you give this benefit up.

Look up history of the Winnipeg Strike. Issues were safety and hours worked. Over the years unions got some good benefits; one was sick days accumulated. when your young you don't need them, when you are older and more prone to sickness, you used the sick days. Now you won't find that now, or they have to be used up in the same fiscal year... take them or loose them. Unions get bad mouthed alot about persons hiding behind the union, or the person with senority gets asked first, if not they get paid anyway for overtime they didn't actually do...

Heavy manufacturing has been shutting down since the 1960 in Canada, shipbuilding, metal production etc. Trade class in schools because they are expensive to run have been cut since the 1980. computer were to be the thing. But who does the work with their hands today. Every young person wants to be the manager, hands off work, hands on computer person; they are the computer savy people, but can't put a nut and bolt together....

Young people making min wage at a store, get to thinking why can't I be the boss and owner. Small business owners have a problem hiring people to work at or near min wage, because the younger generations are getting smarter.

I see young people wanting to work and succeed, but they won't at min wage, no benifits and no pension offered. Why would a young person bust his ass, for no benefit to him or his future?

We live in a consumer driven world, but we as individuals can't make things in our own house, its too expensive (parts expensive) or we don't have the knowledge or time.....

The problem is everyone is greedy, looking out for #1 and its hurting the society we are in.

There is a welfare state in Canada, with 4 or 5 generations on welfare.... Its a endless cycle unless the gov will break it, but it won't, it sends too many votes its way.

The problem I see with many business owners are their lack of faith in governments (being opposed to taxes etc, anything that takes money out of their pockets), if anyone threatens their money, they get downright nasty.... maybe thats being human, but I doubt it.

When in doubt , the people that whine the most get what they want.... Time to tell them to fuck off.....
 

licks2nite

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
1,208
250
83
You can place the blame on unions.At one time unions were needed.With all of the workplace laws etc in force these days unions are not needed so much as employers are held accountable and face severe punishments.In the Private sector it is not so bad(ignoring the entitiled auto workers union) as for the Public Sector it is just plain fucking stupid.The level of inter-departmental bureaucracy that has been built up over the last 50 years is just nuts and this is for Civic/Provincial/Federal.
SR
Trade unions had quite a bit of assistance from Canadian judiciary in approving pay hikes. Wages of trade union members and judiciary grew in tandem and nobody said "boo" until too late. Skilled Canadian workers lost jobs regardless of education for work in low paying, low skill consumer retail and warehousing and putting a cheesy smile on their faces for non-producing service sector jobs. Meanwhile, judiciary kept the pay increases that had also spread to other jurisdictions of Canadian bureaucracy. Effectively paid-off disproportionately from the resources of Canada for work that enabled globalization.
 

licks2nite

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
1,208
250
83
The Empire Is Coming For Tulsi Gabbard
Fri, 08/02/2019 - 07:51
Authored by Tom Luongo via The Strategic Culture Foundation,

The second debate among Democratic hopefuls was notable for two things. The lack of common decency of most of them and Tulsi Gabbard’s immense, career-ending attack on Kamala Harris’ (D-Deep State) record as an Attorney General in California.

Harris came out of the first debate the clear winner and Gabbard cut her down to size with one of the single best minutes of political television since Donald Trump told Hillary Clinton, “Because you’d be in jail.”

Gabbard’s takedown of Harris was so spot on and her closing statement about the irresponsible nature of the Trump Administration’s foreign policy was so powerful she had to be actively suppressed on Twitter.

And, within minutes of the debate ending the media and the political machines moved into overdrive to smear her as a Russian agent, an Assad apologist and a favorite of the alt-right.

Now, folks, let me tell you something. I write and talk about Gabbard a lot and those to the right of me are really skeptical of her being some kind of plant for Israel or the establishment. If she were truly one of those she wouldn’t have been polling at 1% going into that debate.

She would have been promoted as Harris’ strongest competition and served up for Harris to co-opt.

That is not what happened.

No, the fact that Gabbard is being smeared as viciously and baselessly as she is by all the right people on both the left and the right is all the proof you need that she is 1) the real deal and 2) they are scared of her.

When Lindsey Graham tweets about Tulsi Gabbard twice after a debate, when the Washington Post neocons like Josh Rogin are attacking her, you know she’s got their panties in a bunch.

You expect it from the Harris camp, obviously. But when it comes directly from people like Navid Jamali (double agent, navy intelligence, MSNBC contributor) you know the empire is beginning to get worried.

Like Jill Stein and Donald Trump, Gabbard is counting on Russian support. This is why she won’t criticize Assad. This is what we’ve become. An election rife with foreign influence. This is how they attack our election security, not by hacking, but by doing this.
— Naveed Jamali (@NaveedAJamali) August 1, 2019

Gabbard is now getting the Ron Paul treatment. It will only intensify from here. They will come after her with everything they have.

In the past week she’s destroyed Kamala Harris on national TV, sued Google for electioneering and signed onto Thomas Massie’s (R-KY) bill to audit the Federal Reserve. What does she do next week, end the Drug War?

Tulsi Gabbard is admittedly a work in progress. But what I see in her is something that has the potential to be very special. She’s young enough to be both passionately brave and willing to go where the truth takes her.

And that truth has taken her where Democrats have feared to tread for more than forty years: the US Empire.

The entire time I was growing up the prevailing wisdom was Social Security was the third rail of US politics. That, like so many other pearls of wisdom, was nonsense.

The true third rail of US politics is empire. Any candidate that is publicly against the empire is the enemy of not only the state, it’s quislings in the media, the corporations who profit from it and the party machines of both the GOP and the DNC.

That is Gabbard’s crime. And it’s the only crime that matters.

When the Empire is on the line, left and right in the US close ranks and unite against the threat. The good news is that all they have is their pathetic Russia bashing and appeals to their authority on foreign policy.

Foreign policy, by the way, that most people in America, frankly, despise.

And the response to her performance at the second debate was as predictable as the sun rising in the east. It’s also easily countered. Gabbard will face an uphill battle from here and we’ll find out in the coming weeks just how deep into Trump Derangement Syndrome the average Democrat voter is.

If she doesn’t begin climbing in the polls then the Democrats are lost. They will have signed onto crazy Progressivism and more Empire in their lust to destroy Donald Trump. But they will lose because only a principled anti-imperialist like Gabbard can push Trump back to his days when he was the outsider in the GOP debates, railing against our stupid foreign policy.

No one else in the field would be remotely credible on this point. It’s the area where Trump is the weakest. He’s not weak on women’s rights, racism, gay rights or any of the rest of the idiotic identity politics of the rest of the Democratic field.

He’s weakest on the one issue that got him elected in the first place, foreign policy. Hillary was the candidate of Empire. Trump was not. It’s why we saw an international conspiracy formed to destroy him and his presidency. Now that same apparatus is mobilized against Tulsi Gabbard.

That’s good. As a solider she knows that when you’re taking flak you are over your target. Now let’s hope she’s capable of sustaining herself to push this election cycle away from the insanity the elite want to distract us with and make it about the only thing keeping the world from healing, ending the empire of chaos.

source: https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2019/08/02/empire-coming-for-tulsi-gabbard/

Tulsi Gabbard:

 

storm rider

Banned
Dec 6, 2008
2,542
7
0
Calgary
I'm not a union man, but union are needed to keep the business owners honest.

For the last 10 or so years the governments have been union busting, can't give you that, but we will give you that if you give this benefit up.

Look up history of the Winnipeg Strike. Issues were safety and hours worked. Over the years unions got some good benefits; one was sick days accumulated. when your young you don't need them, when you are older and more prone to sickness, you used the sick days. Now you won't find that now, or they have to be used up in the same fiscal year... take them or loose them. Unions get bad mouthed alot about persons hiding behind the union, or the person with senority gets asked first, if not they get paid anyway for overtime they didn't actually do...

Heavy manufacturing has been shutting down since the 1960 in Canada, shipbuilding, metal production etc. Trade class in schools because they are expensive to run have been cut since the 1980. computer were to be the thing. But who does the work with their hands today. Every young person wants to be the manager, hands off work, hands on computer person; they are the computer savy people, but can't put a nut and bolt together....

Young people making min wage at a store, get to thinking why can't I be the boss and owner. Small business owners have a problem hiring people to work at or near min wage, because the younger generations are getting smarter.

I see young people wanting to work and succeed, but they won't at min wage, no benifits and no pension offered. Why would a young person bust his ass, for no benefit to him or his future?

We live in a consumer driven world, but we as individuals can't make things in our own house, its too expensive (parts expensive) or we don't have the knowledge or time.....

The problem is everyone is greedy, looking out for #1 and its hurting the society we are in.

There is a welfare state in Canada, with 4 or 5 generations on welfare.... Its a endless cycle unless the gov will break it, but it won't, it sends too many votes its way.

The problem I see with many business owners are their lack of faith in governments (being opposed to taxes etc, anything that takes money out of their pockets), if anyone threatens their money, they get downright nasty.... maybe thats being human, but I doubt it.

When in doubt , the people that whine the most get what they want.... Time to tell them to fuck off.....
I am well aware of the "welfare state" as my own brother has collected welfare in BC for pretty much 30 years.He was lazy and indolent as a kid.We had chores and he shirked them as best he could.Truth be told my father should have cracked down on him
and perhaps he might not have gone down the path he chose.I also am familiar with multi-generational welfare families.Two of them in fact.At least 2 generations of 2 different families that have never contributed to Society and have only taken from Society
like leaches.One of them was the GF of a friend of mine.Last I heard that cum dumpster of a woman had 7 bastard illegitimate children and was living on welfare in Saskatchewan because she did not have to pay health care premiums for her brood.The other one
was the family of another friend and his common law wife when she found out I was eventually going to get an inheritance of $20,000 + interest from my grandmother she flew off the handle one day and went on a rant at me.After she was done I tore a strip off
her and told her that my grandmother suffered through both WW1/WW2 in Britain with rationing etc and that she made her fortune in real estate by being shrewd.My saintly grandmother carried that cross of war suffering her entire life.When on a camping holiday
with my father at every Husky restaurant they went to she just could not help herself from taking sugar packets/jam tubs etc because they just plain dont offer them in the UK in plentifull amounts.

As for public sector unions and "banked" sick days Canada Post put an end to that and hopefully ALL departments of ALL levels of Government do the same.From doing mail drops at the Canada Post RVU I got to over hear in conversation about 3 people
in their last year of work.In all 3 cases they booked their 6 weeks of paid vacation and then used up 10 months of "banked" sick days and then worked the final 2 weeks.They worked 2 weeks and got a full YEAR of pay.....on the tax payer dime.

The most common response from Public sector union members is "I pay my half" and my cynical reply is "you are a government employee and where does the government get it's money?".....they dont like that response!

SR
 

CDNVT

Gent Who Has Your Back
Jun 19, 2019
152
29
28
PQB/ CDN
techstop.invisionzone.com
I am well
The most common response from Public sector union members is "I pay my half" and my cynical reply is "you are a government employee and where does the government get it's money?".....they dont like that response!

SR
Agreed ,, Here pulling weeds pay 26.50 full benny's . and they just need to show up . Try a tech job , not even close to pay and the training involved !!
A CHANGE IS NEEDED !!
 

storm rider

Banned
Dec 6, 2008
2,542
7
0
Calgary
Agreed ,, Here pulling weeds pay 26.50 full benny's . and they just need to show up . Try a tech job , not even close to pay and the training involved !!
A CHANGE IS NEEDED !!
The city of Calgary has "managers" that get paid over 1 MILLION a year.....it is no wonder the city refuses to publish a "sunshine list" of salaries paid to city workers as there would be a revolt.

Nothing but pigs at the trough feeding on tax payer money.And it infects all levels of government.No way the media would do a story on the Parliamentary dining room as they get to eat there too.

SR
 

masterblaster

Well-known member
May 19, 2004
1,983
1,219
113
The city of Calgary has "managers" that get paid over 1 MILLION a year.....it is no wonder the city refuses to publish a "sunshine list" of salaries paid to city workers as there would be a revolt.

Nothing but pigs at the trough feeding on tax payer money.And it infects all levels of government.No way the media would do a story on the Parliamentary dining room as they get to eat there too.

SR
City managers that get paid over 1 million a year? I would call bullshit on that.
 

johnnydepth

Average Sized Member
Nov 14, 2015
1,642
452
83
winnipeg
City managers that get paid over 1 million a year? I would call bullshit on that.
Winnipeg publishes names and salaries of various city workers in a compensation disclosure report. I'm surprised Calgary doesn't do the same. I don't recall seeing anyone near $1million.
 

licks2nite

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
1,208
250
83
Lets Talk About The Federal Reserve Bank's Inflation Obsession
August 2, 2019 - 06:25
Submitted by Guy Haselmann, macro strategist

We accept too much of what Fed officials say at face value.

Given that they are conducting the greatest monetary experiment in history, it is essential that we ask better questions and demand coherent answers. It is crucial we take a deeper look at their objectives, their means of achieving them, and the long run consequences of their actions.

The Federal Reserve has a so-called statutory dual mandate - maximum employment and price stability. For decades (and despite the stagflation of the 1970’s), the Fed assumed that there was a negative correlation between these mandates, i.e., if unemployment fell than inflation rose. This was known as the Phillips Curve.

In the 1990’s, a key metric discussed by the Fed was NAIRU, an acronym for Non-Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment. It referred to a theoretical level of unemployment below which inflation would be expected to rise. This rate was assumed to be near 5.5%, then lowered to 4.5%.

Today the nation’s unemployment rate is 3.7% and has been below 4.5% since February 2017.

Earlier this month, the Fed admitted that the relationship in the Phillips Curve was dead. It has always been an illusion to think that increasing inflation would lower unemployment. For decades, the Fed has been using this faulty model to steer its policy decisions.

Today, the Fed appears obsessed with getting the inflation rate higher. It has shown a willingness to do ‘whatever it takes’ to achieve its self-imposed 2% inflation target. Many questions surround this obsession as well as its ability to actually navigate a pinpoint-perfect 2% landing.

The Fed readily admits that measuring overall consumer inflation is very difficult. I would think in a highly-complex $20 trillion global economy that is an understatement. But, how can Fed actions be considered respectable when its inflation metrics are so imprecise.

Nonetheless, The Fed’s preferred measure of inflation has been stable in a range of 1.3% to 2.0% for over 4 years. In July 1996 Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan defined stable prices as “that state in which expected changes in the general price level do not effectively alter business and household decisions.”

So, what’s the problem. With stable inflation, an unemployment rate near the lowest in 50 years, near record stock prices, why then is the Federal Reserve tinkering and trying to micro-manage such a large complex economy?

We should certainly not accept at face value the Fed’s assertion that inflation is too low and higher inflation should be welcomed. Inflation is not a state of Nirvana as fed officials would like us to believe. Inflation is theft of our money’s value.

A 2% inflation rate would cut the purchasing power of our money by 50% in 36 years. NY Fed President John Williams said that he would even be willing to allow inflation to move to 3% for a period of time, effectively halving the value of our hard-earned money in 24 years.

Think about that. In a 3% inflation world, if you inherit money at birth and live to 72 years old, the value of your money would be cut in half, and then cut in half again, and then cut in half a third time. $100 would be worth $12.50 over this time, all else being equal.

Furthermore, how can our politicians talk about wealth inequality without talking about Federal Reserve policy? Inflation hurts the poorest people the most, because the poor’s biggest asset is cash, not financial assets.

In addition, inflation has moral hazard ramifications by harming savers for the benefit of borrowers. Doesn’t this create all the wrong incentives in society?

The motivation behind generating inflation is to motivate the consumer to spend money as soon as possible. This becomes more important as the amount of Fed-induced global indebtedness grows to ever-higher record breaking levels. We need and deserve better answers, while the Fed needs to find an exit strategy and a policy that is sustainable and beneficial for the long run.


Source with charts: https://nationandstate.com/2019/08/02/lets-talk-about-the-feds-inflation-obsession/

 

licks2nite

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
1,208
250
83
Currency War With China: 1934 And 2019
Sunday, August 11, 2019
Authored by Steve Hanke, The American Institute for Economic Research,


Chiang Kai-shek, whose nationalist movement lost power to the communists after the last US/China currency war

In a purely political move, the Trump administration (read: the U.S. Treasury) has branded China as a currency manipulator. This is an act of war. After President Trump announced that even more tariffs would be imposed on China, the markets took the value of the Chinese yuan down a notch or two. So, who was “manipulating” the yuan, Beijing or Washington? Well, it looks like Washington is engaging in yet another Asian currency war.

As it turns out, the United States has a long history of waging currency wars in Asia.

We all know the sad case of Japan. The U.S. claimed that unfair Japanese trading practices were ballooning its bilateral trade deficit with Japan. To “correct” the so-called problem, the U.S. demanded that Japan adopt an ever-appreciating yen policy. The Japanese complied and the yen appreciated against the greenback from 360 in 1971 to 80 in 1995 (and 106, today). But, this didn't close the U.S. trade deficit with Japan. Indeed, Japan's contribution to the overall U.S. trade deficit reached almost 60% in 1991. And, if that wasn't enough, the yen's appreciation pushed Japan's economy into a deflationary quagmire.

Today, the U.S. is playing the same baseless blame game with China. And why not? After all, China's contribution to the overall U.S. trade deficit has surged to 47%.

America’s recent declaration of economic war against China isn’t the first time the U.S. has used currency as a weapon to destabilize the Middle Kingdom.

In the early 1930s, China was still on the silver standard, and the United States was not. Accordingly, the Chinese yuan-U.S. dollar exchange rate was determined by the U.S. dollar price of silver.

During his first term, President Franklin D. Roosevelt delivered on his Chinese currency stabilization “plan.” It was wrapped in the guise of doing something to help U.S. silver producers and, of course, the Chinese.

Using the authority granted by the Thomas Amendment of 1933 and the Silver Purchase Act of 1934, the Roosevelt Administration bought silver. This, in addition to bullish rumors about U.S. silver policies, helped push the price of silver up by 128% (calculated as an annual average) in the 1932-35 period.

Bizarre arguments contributed to the agitation for high silver prices. One centered on the fact that China was on the silver standard. Silver interests asserted that higher silver prices — which would bring with them an appreciation of the yuan against the U.S. dollar — would benefit the Chinese by increasing their purchasing power.

As a special committee of the U.S. Senate reported in 1932:

“silver is the measure of their wealth and purchasing power; it serves as a reserve, their bank account. This is wealth that enables such peoples to purchase our exports.”

But, things didn’t work as Washington advertised. They worked as “planned,” however. As the dollar price of silver shot up, the yuan appreciated against the dollar. In consequence, China was thrown into the jaws of the Great Depression. In the 1932-34 period, China’s gross domestic product fell by 26% and wholesale prices in the capital city, Nanjing, fell by 20%.

In an attempt to secure relief from the economic hardships imposed by U.S. silver policies, China sought modifications in the U.S. Treasury’s silver-purchase program. But, its pleas fell on deaf ears. After many evasive replies, the Roosevelt Administration finally indicated on October 12, 1934 that it was merely carrying out a policy mandated by the U.S. Congress.

Realizing that all hope was lost, China was forced to effectively abandon the silver standard on October 14, 1934, though an official statement was postponed until November 3, 1935. The abandonment of silver spelled the beginning of the end for Chiang Kai-shek’s Nationalist government. America’s “plan” worked like a charm — Chinese monetary chaos ensued. This gave the communists an opening that they exploited — one that contributed mightily to their overthrow of the Nationalists.

Today’s currency war with China promises to deliver what currency wars always deliver: instability and uncertainty. And with that, it’s becoming clearer with each passing day that President Trump will not be the 2020 “Peace and Prosperity” candidate.

Source: https://www.aier.org/article/currency-war-china-1934-and-2019
 

licks2nite

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
1,208
250
83
The Biggest Migration Since The Barbarian Invasions Of Rome
Mon, 08/12/2019 - 03:30
by Doug Casey, InternationalMan.com



International Man: Former Libyan leader Muammar Ghaddafi once warned that “Europe runs the risk of turning black from illegal immigration… it could turn into Africa.”

Since the United States and NATO helped overthrow Ghaddafi in 2011, millions of migrants from Africa and the Middle East have poured into Europe. Many transited from Libya.

This is all well known, and all signs point to this trend accelerating. What’s your take on where this is going?

Doug Casey: First, it’s a pity Ghaddafi was taken out. Another disastrous US policy decision. Not that he was a nice guy—no one running an artificially constructed nation-state can be. But it was at least a stable situation. Now it’s been replaced by a bloody and costly war. And it’s complete chaos. Nice work Hillary and Obama. But let’s talk about Africa at large.

Africa, or at least migration in and out of Africa, is going to be the epicenter of what’s happening in the world for the rest of this century.

Africa has gone from being just an empty space on the map in the 19thcentury, to a bunch of backwater colonies in the 20th century, to a bunch of chaotic failed states that most people are only vaguely aware of today. Soon, however, it will be continuing front-page news. This is because Chinese are moving to Africa in record numbers while Africans are leaving as fast as they can.

What we’re looking at is actually the biggest migration since the barbarian invasions of the Roman Empire. There will be tens of millions—scores of millions—of Africans trying to get into Europe. I don’t know how the Europeans will keep them out. I used to say Europe was going to be a petting zoo for the Chinese, but it may be more of a squatter’s camp for the Africans.

Africa is the only part of the world where the population is still growing and growing rapidly. Africa south of the Sahara was about 6% of the world’s population in the ’50s, now it’s about 16%. But by the turn of the century, it’s going to be 45%. Assuming there isn’t some kind of catastrophe. It’s not clear that the Africans can grow enough food for billions more people.

In fact, if the West stops supporting the continent with capital and technology, it could be in for very tough times. Wakanda, the country in “Black Panther”, doesn’t exist. On the contrary, the continent is full of Gondwana lookalikes. Gondwana is where most of the action takes place in Speculator, the novel John Hunt and I wrote. It’s the first of seven in the High Ground series.

Few people realize how fast the population is growing, and things are changing in Africa. I ask knowledgeable people what they think the biggest cities in the world will be at the turn of the next century. They all guess cities in China or India.

But that’s not true. Eighty years from now, Lagos, Nigeria, will be the largest city in the world. It’s on track to have a population of more than 90 million. The world’s second biggest city will be Kinshasa in the Congo with about 80 million people. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, will be the world’s third biggest city with a population of roughly 75 million people. It’s quite amazing. When I first visited Dar in the early ’80s, it was a quiet, exotic seaport with old tramp steamers in the harbor.

Now all those people have cell phones, and they’re well aware of the fact that the standard of living is vastly higher in Europe and every other part of the world than in Africa. And they’re well aware of the fact that there are welfare benefits of all types if they can get to Europe.

There are hundreds of NGOs encouraging Africans to come across the Mediterranean to Europe. Or for that matter, flying them to the US. Exactly who paid the airfare and legal and living expenses of the 200,000 penniless Somalis who were transplanted to Minnesota?

It’s a growing tidal wave. With the European population diminishing and the African population growing, you’re going to see Europe basically taken over by Africa in the next several generations.

International Man: What we don’t hear as much about is the massive migration of the Chinese to Africa that’s taking place.

Doug, you’ve spent a lot of time in Africa. What’s going on with all this?

Doug Casey: We’re seeing a veritable recolonization of Africa. Each time I visit Africa, there are more Chinese. It doesn’t matter which country; they’re everywhere.

Rich Chinese are smart to diversify to developed Western countries. Poor Chinese go to backward countries to try to become wealthy. Africa is the prime recipient.

It’s supposed to be official Chinese policy to migrate about 300 million Chinese to Africa in the years to come. They’re employed in building roads, railroads, ports, mines, and other infrastructure. It’s partially driven by their Belt and Road Initiative.

The Chinese are lending billions to African governments. African governments are, by an order of magnitude, the most corrupt in the world. And the people who run these African governments are being well compensated for making deals with the Chinese. And in effect, selling out their countrymen. All these governments are full of people trying to be “Mister 10%.”

The worst case for them is to retire as centimillionaires, to live high off the hog in France or Switzerland. So, they’ve got nothing to lose. It’s a fairly unstoppable trend at this point.

Regardless of how much is stolen, however, I expect the Chinese are going to want the money they loaned to the Africans back, with interest.

If bribing or intimidating political leaders proves ineffective in getting it back, it’s possible that they’ll put soldiers’ boots on the ground. They could send in the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to defend their assets. Or send in assassins to take out recalcitrant African politicians.

I wouldn’t be surprised to find the PLA in Africa in the years to come, physically collecting on those debts. And to make it easier for them, they’re going to be greeted by lots of Chinese already there.

It will be interesting to see what happens when a couple hundred million Chinese are living with a radically expanding native African population.

If the Africans were unhappy with European colonization, I think they’re going to be very, very unhappy with the Chinese colonization. The Chinese will not be “inclusive” and PC like today’s Westerners. It has the makings of a race war a generation or so in the future.

International Man: What about Africa piques the interests of the Chinese?

Doug Casey: It’s important to remember that Africa doesn’t produce anything besides raw materials—and people. There’s close to zero manufacturing—like 1% of the world’s total—in sub-Saharan Africa. And almost all of that is in South Africa.

The Chinese see Africans as no more than a cheap and dispensable labor source. That’s at best. Other than that, they’re viewed as a complete nuisance. Basically an obstacle—a cost—standing in the way of efficient use of the resources of the continent itself.

What do the Chinese people think of Africans? They don’t hold them in high regard. Of course, you’ve got to remember that China has viewed itself as the center of the world since Day One. They see all non-Han people as barbarians, as inferiors.

That was absolutely true when the British sent an ambassador, Macartney, to open relations at the very end of the 18th century. He was treated with borderline contempt—pretty much the way Europeans and Americans have treated primitive peoples since the days of Columbus.

It’s actually the normal human attitude when an advanced culture encounters a backward culture. The Chinese see their culture as superior to even that of the West and believe—probably correctly—that they’ll soon be economically and technologically superior as well.

International Man: If China comes to dominate Africa and its resources, what does that mean for its rivalry with the US?

Doug Casey: Well, the US government is basically bankrupt at this point. The only thing that the US exports in quantity is US dollars. And sometime soon, the Chinese, the Russians, the Malaysians, the Iranians, and the Indians, among others, won’t need or want US dollars. They don’t want to accept them now, because it’s an asset of their adversary or even their enemy. They’re unhappy about having to settle accounts in dollars that all have to clear through New York.

So, they’re going to come up with their own alternative. And I suspect they’re going to use gold. Why? Because they don’t trust each other’s paper currencies. And why should they?

How’s the United States going to react to that?

It’s going to be left out in the cold. No one needs or wants their dollars—they want and need real goods, not the paper obligations of a hostile, unpredictable, bankrupt government. Also, the US isn’t in a position to export people, except for some unwelcome soldiers. The Chinese are in an excellent position to export a couple hundred million spare people. The bottom line is that the Chinese are going to take over Africa financially, and they’re going to take it over demographically as well.

International Man: What kind of speculative opportunities do you think this trend will create?

Doug Casey: Well, I’ve often said that if I were 30 years old today and wanted to make my fortune, I would definitely go to Africa. The reason for that is that you don’t want to be on a level playing field. You want to be on a field tilted in your direction as much as possible.

If a young Westerner goes to Africa and travels around, he’ll find it quite easy to move with the top levels of society. Because he’s unusual. And people are interested in things that are unusual. The fact that you’re a Westerner means that you’ve probably associated with people who have much more money, much more sophistication, much more knowledge than any of the locals do. You have unique advantages in Africa. If a young Westerner stays at home, however, he has no marginal advantages.

It’s very hard to vault yourself to the top in a Western society, because there are tens of millions of people just like you with the same education, background, and abilities.

But in Africa, you’re automatically on the top of the heap. And you’re noticeable. So, it’s a great place to go for entrepreneurial reasons.

At the same time, I don’t think Africa is a place to invest unless you’ve got the PLA standing behind you. It’s a place for a hit-and-run type of entrepreneurialism. Or perhaps political entrepreneurialism.

As corrupt as Africa is, the way almost everybody makes money is by getting hooked up with the government. And that’s possible to do. You could go to any number of African countries, hang out there for a month, and be sitting down with the president.

That’s not going to happen if you try to do the same thing in North America or Europe or for that matter even South America or Asia.

International Man: If you were 30 years old and looking for opportunity in Africa, what countries in particular would you be most interested in?

Doug Casey: Well, I wouldn’t jump off the deep end at first. Don’t go to a place like Nigeria to start. Nor is South Africa ideal for this purpose. It’s too developed, and there are too many people of European descent—although that’s changing. White people are making what the Rhodesians called “the chicken run” and for the same reasons. There’s too much anti-white racism in South Africa, and besides, the economy is going into reverse.

I would go to a country like Namibia, which is large, empty, and pretty mellow. I would definitely look at Mozambique. Or Mauritania—a huge country, where nobody goes. São Tomé and Príncipe, an obscure island country off the west coast. If you’re adventurous, the Central African Republic, which is probably the most backward country in Africa.

Source: https://internationalman.com/articles/thebiggestmigrationsincethebarbarianinvasionsofrome/
 

superdude3

New member
Jan 29, 2019
8
0
0
well its look different then is today more populations less land in 30 years i hear that most governments are going in canada robots run everything just like computers today so lets enjoy what we got mcdonalds subway and your local supermarkets in 2030s no many them around when found this i was shocked.
 

r.williams.34

New member
Dec 4, 2014
27
0
1
Vancouver
I don't believe the climate change bs, I think it's a scare tactic to start raising taxes. I doubled down on this thought after I saw some kids recite some UN "studies" on the news. Any time children talk about any important issues it's highly suspicious.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Vancouver Escorts