...and that's not to refer to Japan as China, twice, especially to Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Do all Asian men look the same?
No. Non. Iie. Nein. (One "no" would suffice, but apparently a post needs to be at least 10 characters).Do all Asian men look the same?
Tell Justin.No. Non. Iie. Nein. (One "no" would suffice, but apparently a post needs to be at least 10 characters).
Lol. And why do you assume the PM thinks otherwise? Is no one permitted to misspeak? Why do you assume it's something to do with race? Could it not be that the two were talking about China and the PM simply misspoke when reporters asked a question? Are you Japanese and personally offended by the PM's words? Are you not Japanese and just offended on behalf of all Japanese people?Tell Justin.
Japanese consider Chinese to be of inferior ethics, and Chinese people have ancestral hatred against the Japanese.Lol. And why do you assume the PM thinks otherwise? Is no one permitted to misspeak? Why do you assume it's something to do with race? Could it not be that the two were talking about China and the PM simply misspoke when reporters asked a question? Are you Japanese and personally offended by the PM's words? Are you not Japanese and just offended on behalf of all Japanese people?
Lol. George Bush.....Aside from the "incident" mentioned above, who else besides me is getting to the point where listening to him is painful?
He can't form a cohesive sentence. If not reading directly off of a prepared script every 2nd word is Uhm or Uh.
You'd think someone in his camp would notice this and get him some professional speaking help.
And I'm not saying this because I think he's an entitled, self righteous, narcissistic little bitch who needs to be returned to teaching drama.
I'd say this about any high ranking public speaker who can't speak.
Cheers
J
The only thing I may be assuming is JT is incompetent, I think that's a pretty safe assumption; he's doing a good job of confirming that....why do you assume the PM thinks otherwise? Is no one permitted to misspeak? Why do you assume it's something to do with race?...
JT was talking about China with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. How serious of a discussion would it be? He hasn't even appointed a new ambassador to China after firing McCallum for total incompetence. That's more incompetence given our troubles with China....the two were talking about China...
No. I'm pretty WASP. When I was in China I was often told "you big noses all look the same". The Chinese are pretty direct....Are you Japanese and personally offended by the PM's words? Are you not Japanese and just offended on behalf of all Japanese people?
The PM's incompetence and your embarrassment are one thing. But what does either of those two things have anything to do with, what seems to be based on your original post, your assertion that the PM believes that all Asian men look the same? If you believe the man is incompetent, you most certainly can state your belief. If you are embarrassed by what he said, again, you most certainly could've stated that as well. But to imply a person sees all Asian men as looking the same is clearly not the same as stating he is incompetent or that you are embarrassed by what he said. So, if you believe the PM sees all Asian men as looking the same, simply state it. Since you implied it, do you believe the PM sees all Asian men look the same?The only thing I may be assuming is JT is incompetent, I think that's a pretty safe assumption; he's doing a good job of confirming that.
JT was talking about China with Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. How serious of a discussion would it be? He hasn't even appointed a new ambassador to China after firing McCallum for total incompetence. That's more incompetence given our troubles with China.
No. I'm pretty WASP. When I was in China I was often told "you big noses all look the same". The Chinese are pretty direct.
My sister's parents are Japanese and Filipino. She thinks similar to me. Or I to her? Nature versus Nurture? We are both Canadians and not offended, just embarrassed.
lots, one of his first lies was Canada is back, his India trip, could go on but why botherThe PM's incompetence and your embarrassment are one thing. But what does either of those two things have anything to do with
And none of your evidence points to the PM believing that all Asian men look the same. That's the whole point, OP insinuated that the PM sees all Asian men looking the same based on saying "China" when he should've said "Japan". Now the OP follows up with competence as his apparent point. If misspeaking is a sign of incompetence so be it. If all that you cite is evidence of incompetence so be it. But none of that is evidence that the PM believes all Asian men look the same - it's merely an attempt to connect two unrelated things. Misspeaking may be evidence of incompetence, but it's dubious at best to say that provides evidence of how someone sees all Asian men.lots, one of his first lies was Canada is back, his India trip, could go on but why bother
when you boast, lie, exaggerate, people are going to call you on your bullshit
unfortunately for Canada, the country is now being made a laughing stock, much like the US, because of the clown they have
we have our own clown, Trudeau, he's so much more like Trump than not, the law doesn't apply to him, he's incompetent, corrupt, out to lunch internationally, out for himself, more concerned with his image/likability, ect....
his behaviour is going to cost us, relations internationally, economically, already happening, if we don't get rid of him
for christ sakes, all he had to do is write it on his hand like the average coked out rock star that reminds themselves of which town they're in that night, lol
he's even more lost without Butt's hand up his ass running things
Your logic and reasoning hurts my brain.And none of your evidence points to the PM believing that all Asian men look the same. That's the whole point, OP insinuated that the PM sees all Asian men looking the same based on saying "China" when he should've said "Japan". Now the OP follows up with competence as his apparent point. If misspeaking is a sign of incompetence so be it. If all that you cite is evidence of incompetence so be it. But none of that is evidence that the PM believes all Asian men look the same - it's merely an attempt to connect two unrelated things. Misspeaking may be evidence of incompetence, but it's dubious at best to say that provides evidence of how someone sees all Asian men.
Lol! I guess the truth does hurt sometimeYour logic and reasoning hurts my brain.
JT can't form a complete sentence without an "uhh" every 4 words, and that's when it's written for him to read off of!! The guy is an embarrassment, right beside that waste of skin Trump imoLol. And why do you assume the PM thinks otherwise? Is no one permitted to misspeak? Why do you assume it's something to do with race? Could it not be that the two were talking about China and the PM simply misspoke when reporters asked a question? Are you Japanese and personally offended by the PM's words? Are you not Japanese and just offended on behalf of all Japanese people?
If someone who misspeaks, can't form a coherent sentence or says "uh, umm" a lot is your definition of an embarrassment, so be it. I care not how someone defines what an embarrassment is. However; I do care when OP implies that a person sees all Asian men as looking the same and uses dubious evidence to demonstrate that implied assertion. Do you see the difference?JT can't form a complete sentence without an "uhh" every 4 words, and that's when it's written for him to read off of!! The guy is an embarrassment, right beside that waste of skin Trump imo
You've referred to the OP and his statement that " do all Asian men look the same?"....at least four times in this thread.If someone who misspeaks, can't form a coherent sentence or says "uh, umm" a lot is your definition of an embarrassment, so be it. I care not how someone defines what an embarrassment is. However; I do care when OP implies that a person sees all Asian men as looking the same and uses dubious evidence to demonstrate that implied assertion. Do you see the difference?
If the Japanese PM was insulted and/or offended he most certainly can speak for himself. When any person says "China" instead of "Japan" I do not believe that warrants a reference/question as to whether that person views all Asian men as looking the same. When I answered the OP's question as to whether "do all Asian men look the same" with a simple no. To which the OP stated "tell Justin", which infers a belief that the PM believes otherwise. And I specifically called the OP out, to either confirm or deny whether OP believes the PM sees all Asian men as looking alike - no veiled assumptions or implicit assertions, just straight up say what he thinks. Instead the OP sidesteps and brings up incompetence. If OP believes the PM or anyone is a person that sees all Asian men as looking the same: one that's a borderline acquisition of racism and two, instead of beating around the bush with veiled questions and dubious evidence of saying "China" instead of "Japan", OP should just come out and say it or clarify his stance. All OP's subsequent talk about competence, his Asian family members, his trip to Asia where people made comments about his nose is just sidestepping and avoidance. I don't like when the extreme left calls people they disagree with as "racist" or "white nationalist" or whatever slur. And since I like to be consistent in my beliefs, I don't tolerate the veiled reference to racism leveled at the PM, even though I personally disagree with the PM on many issues. Make sense?You've referred to the OP and his statement that " do all Asian men look the same?"....at least four times in this thread.
There was nothing dubious, or demonstrative....I took it as the OP couldn't believe the PM would make such a mistake, as the two nations have a distaste for each other ,reaching back a thousand years.
It was questioning the PM's lack of judgement....I don't believe it was a racial slur....it was simply a question.
At least that's how I took it anyways...but remember I'm not an Asian male, but I do understand an awful lot about Japanese culture....and that mistake from a world leader, would have not sat well with a Japanese dignitary.
You must be a riot at parties...not that anyone with any sense would ever invite you to one.If the Japanese PM was insulted and/or offended he most certainly can speak for himself. When any person says "China" instead of "Japan" I do not believe that warrants a reference/question as to whether that person views all Asian men as looking the same. When I answered the OP's question as to whether "do all Asian men look the same" with a simple no. To which the OP stated "tell Justin", which infers a belief that the PM believes otherwise. And I specifically called the OP out, to either confirm or deny whether OP believes the PM sees all Asian men as looking alike - no veiled assumptions or implicit assertions, just straight up say what he thinks. Instead the OP sidesteps and brings up incompetence. If OP believes the PM or anyone is a person that sees all Asian men as looking the same: one that's a borderline acquisition of racism and two, instead of beating around the bush with veiled questions and dubious evidence of saying "China" instead of "Japan", OP should just come out and say it or clarify his stance. All OP's subsequent talk about competence, his Asian family members, his trip to Asia where people made comments about his nose is just sidestepping and avoidance. I don't like when the extreme left calls people they disagree with as "racist" or "white nationalist" or whatever slur. And since I like to be consistent in my beliefs, I don't tolerate the veiled reference to racism leveled at the PM, even though I personally disagree with the PM on many issues. Make sense?
Personally ....I think you reading way too much into it, and your overreacting.If the Japanese PM was insulted and/or offended he most certainly can speak for himself. When any person says "China" instead of "Japan" I do not believe that warrants a reference/question as to whether that person views all Asian men as looking the same. When I answered the OP's question as to whether "do all Asian men look the same" with a simple no. To which the OP stated "tell Justin", which infers a belief that the PM believes otherwise. And I specifically called the OP out, to either confirm or deny whether OP believes the PM sees all Asian men as looking alike - no veiled assumptions or implicit assertions, just straight up say what he thinks. Instead the OP sidesteps and brings up incompetence. If OP believes the PM or anyone is a person that sees all Asian men as looking the same: one that's a borderline acquisition of racism and two, instead of beating around the bush with veiled questions and dubious evidence of saying "China" instead of "Japan", OP should just come out and say it or clarify his stance. All OP's subsequent talk about competence, his Asian family members, his trip to Asia where people made comments about his nose is just sidestepping and avoidance. I don't like when the extreme left calls people they disagree with as "racist" or "white nationalist" or whatever slur. And since I like to be consistent in my beliefs, I don't tolerate the veiled reference to racism leveled at the PM, even though I personally disagree with the PM on many issues. Make sense?





