[SUZY] So, a doctor just told me...

CJ Tylers

Retired Sr. Member
Jan 3, 2003
1,643
1
0
46
North Vancouver
And I just realized I misspelled "Susi" as "Suzy", as in "Suzy Derkens", ala Calvin and Hobbes fame. Doh!
 

screwtape1963

Member
Sep 17, 2004
71
0
6
so these are the mellissa farely stats brought up over and over. the sample group were a group of at risk youth between the ages of 11 and 17. so, while the stat is hoisted as the truth and as the average age of entry into prostitution, it is actually the average age of a group of at risk youth...

the mis information of the abolitionists was thrown out of the scc case because it did not qualify as reliable/ethical data in a canadian court of law.

the abolitionists will continue to promote this myth as fact in their push for the nordic model. we really need to try to find a way to counter this. again, it takes alot of time and effort. there are some of us working on it but its a huge task.

love susie
Question Susie: According to the OP, the doctor talking about this said that the statistics were gleaned from "actual medical visits" - which is why I made the comment about probably being from ER 'rape kit' visits.

However, if the sample group was a group of "at-risk" youth aged 11 to 17, was the information derived from "medical visits" or was it from some kind of survey of the youth at youth drop-in centres?
 

dickotoole

Active member
Feb 17, 2006
338
27
28
yvr
Could be from girls arrested and incarcerated in youth detention centres who then visit the doctor while inside the detention centre. But I don't know if they lock up 13, 12, 11, . . .. year olds. I do know that they lock up the older girls for prostitution - at least I know they did ten years ago. A friend worked at one of them in the lower mainland and told me tales of that 'sale' going on inside too, that some guards were all about trading favours with the girls and some of the girls were eager to trade favours too.

It would be interesting to know how old each of the providers on perb were their first time professionally. How old were you? Or, how old was your friend when she started in the trade? All the press we read or news we hear says 13, 14, under 17 or something like that and I have come to believe that. That most women are not in the profession because as they grew up they thought, "damn, wouldn't it be nice once day to be . . . ." . My experiences have shown me that many women are in it because they have to for one reason or another - pimp, drugs, education (lack of it or to obtain more), life trauma or some sort recent or past. And I accept that we each have our own story we live, that I buy sex because I too am not a perfect person and have my own issues to work on. . . . and many people will never resolve all life's challenges . . . . so WTF why not accept that some people will find themselves being used one way or another (we all gotta serve somebody) and that sex is a commodity, always has been always will be. We can't save everyone all the time and some don't want to be saved for a whole lotta reasons . . .
had a few beers so I apologize for the gaps in my thinking
 

summerbreeze

New member
Sep 19, 2004
1,878
4
0
probably does not take into account the asian aunties who will now be moving the average way up

with their younger looks they are able to stay in the business a lot longer than most non-asians
 

susi

Sassy Strumpette
Supporting Member
Jun 27, 2008
1,501
397
83
57
@the Meat Market!!!lol
here's a great description of the flaws of those numbers
http://maggiemcneill.wordpress.com/2011/11/27/the-law-of-averages/

which were actually based on this study http://maggiemcneill.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/estes-weiner-2001.pdf

which is deeply flawed in the way i described and is a myth proliferated by melissa farely and other abolitionists

it does not appear that the study was done via rape crisis center or medical check up either but rather focuses on as i said before youth at risk, not adult sex workers.
 

Tugela

New member
Oct 26, 2010
1,913
1
0
Well, if the "average age of working girls is 13", then that would mean that for every 40 year old working in the industry, then you're going to need five 8 year olds plus one 11 year old to pull that average back down to 13 years of age. For every 30 year old you have working, you would need six 10 year olds to offset it. For every 19 year old (which is VERY young in this industry) you would need six 12 year olds to bring the average age down to 13.

Uhhhh...yeah, right.

I've been shocked to hear in the past how low the average age that a female FIRST engages in sexual activity - and it seems to me that many females may have their first encounters in their early teen years. But the idea that pre-teens are either walking the streets, advertising online, or being pimped out at 13 years old AS A STARTING AGE strikes me as being an extremely rare occurrence (although I'm sure that in this sick world it obviously happens). However, I know that if I ever saw this occur knowing that a girl was underage I would be the first to not just report it, but I'd also grab that girl and take her to the first police station I came across - and I know that there are many guys in here that would do the same. In all my years I have yet to come across a girl who was anywhere close to being THAT young - never mind that being their average starting age. Mathematically 13 can't possibly be the average age of a working girl.

Not only that, any experienced pooner who has ever had a session with a 20 year old (give or take) KNOWS that without exception it is clear that at that age virtually all girls are incredibly inexperienced in the industry - and certainly NEVER carry themselves in such a way demonstrating that they've already had 7 years of experience by the time that they've reached that age.

Apparently your doctor friend fails at both math and common sense, or else there must be entire cities full of hundreds of thousands of school children being slaved off to the sex industry here in Canada that none of us are aware of. This claim is so ridiculous and lacking in common sense I wonder if this guy should have his license revoked.
You misunderstand statistics. If you have two 13 year old SPs and one 40 year old SP, the average age is 13, not 22. The actual age of the individuals is irrelevant, it does not enter into the equation. You could equally well say you have two green SPs and one purple one, then the average SP would be green.
 

PlayfulAlex

Still Playing...
Jan 18, 2010
2,580
0
0
www.playfulAlex.com
You misunderstand statistics. If you have two 13 year old SPs and one 40 year old SP, the average age is 13, not 22. The actual age of the individuals is irrelevant, it does not enter into the equation. You could equally well say you have two green SPs and one purple one, then the average SP would be green.
That's very interesting news, Tugela...in other words, the statistical term 'average' simply relates to the majority, in this case, the average/majority of sex workers in sample (1) was 13, and in sample (2) green. Fascinating shit. That's why they can always statistically prove whatever they want to prove. Wow!
 

Tugela

New member
Oct 26, 2010
1,913
1
0
It would be interesting to know how old each of the providers on perb were their first time professionally. How old were you? Or, how old was your friend when she started in the trade? All the press we read or news we hear says 13, 14, under 17 or something like that and I have come to believe that. That most women are not in the profession because as they grew up they thought, "damn, wouldn't it be nice once day to be . . . ." . My experiences have shown me that many women are in it because they have to for one reason or another - pimp, drugs, education (lack of it or to obtain more), life trauma or some sort recent or past. And I accept that we each have our own story we live, that I buy sex because I too am not a perfect person and have my own issues to work on. . . . and many people will never resolve all life's challenges . . . . so WTF why not accept that some people will find themselves being used one way or another (we all gotta serve somebody) and that sex is a commodity, always has been always will be. We can't save everyone all the time and some don't want to be saved for a whole lotta reasons . . .
had a few beers so I apologize for the gaps in my thinking
Everyone has their own reason, the one they tell people and the one they don't (the real reason). When you get down to it the real reason in almost all cases is materialistic in one way or another.

If you have to explain to people why you are doing something that society holds in disregard, I don't think there are many people who will say they did it for the money or self gratification in some form. Rather, they will give some other reason or point the finger somewhere else as explanation, anything that shifts the "blame" somewhere else, they had no choice, etc etc.

It is not only SPs who do this, the clients do it was well, albeit from a different angle.

I realize that in some cases people really do have no option, but 99% of the time it is a conscious decision.
 

Tugela

New member
Oct 26, 2010
1,913
1
0
That's very interesting news, Tugela...in other words, the statistical term 'average' simply relates to the majority, in this case, the average/majority of sex workers in sample (1) was 13, and in sample (2) green. Fascinating shit. That's why they can always statistically prove whatever they want to prove. Wow!
The age is a property of the individuals, it doesn't have a numeric value in itself. Just think of it as a token, and group people based on what token corresponds to them. And from that you can figure out which token is the average one.

For example, if you had a group of 100 people, and 99 of them were 1 year old, and the last one was 100 years old. Their average age wouldn't be 50, it would be 1. The 100 year old would just be a massive outlier of the group as a whole, and you can't use that to infer a general property (in this case, age).
 

Tugela

New member
Oct 26, 2010
1,913
1
0
Within this community, I believe you are going to find a whole lotta 'conscious decision'...
IMO, of course you are. But you can be equally certain that when confronted with the fact of their activities, the vast majority are going to be trying to misdirect attention away from that conscious decision by pointing the finger else where.
 

Horse99

New member
Aug 17, 2006
555
1
0
Vancouver
You misunderstand statistics. If you have two 13 year old SPs and one 40 year old SP, the average age is 13, not 22. The actual age of the individuals is irrelevant, it does not enter into the equation. You could equally well say you have two green SPs and one purple one, then the average SP would be green.


The median age is 13, the average age is 22 (13+13+40=66/3=22)....irregardless, these stats are b.s.
 

CLUB78

New member
Aug 30, 2013
368
1
0
27
You misunderstand statistics. If you have two 13 year old SPs and one 40 year old SP, the average age is 13, not 22. The actual age of the individuals is irrelevant, it does not enter into the equation. You could equally well say you have two green SPs and one purple one, then the average SP would be green.


The median age is 13, the average age is 22 (13+13+40=66/3=22)....irregardless, these stats are b.s.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_do_you_calculate_an_average#q1965080/page/1
 

vancity_cowboy

hard riding member
Jan 27, 2008
5,491
8
38
on yer ignore list
The age is a property of the individuals, it doesn't have a numeric value in itself. Just think of it as a token, and group people based on what token corresponds to them. And from that you can figure out which token is the average one.

For example, if you had a group of 100 people, and 99 of them were 1 year old, and the last one was 100 years old. Their average age wouldn't be 50, it would be 1. The 100 year old would just be a massive outlier of the group as a whole, and you can't use that to infer a general property (in this case, age).
hey tug, i'm not sure what you are saying here. i always thought ages were data, and that the calculation of central tendencies was very straightforward, but i'm always open to being re-educated :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_tendency
 

HankQuinlan

I dont re Member
Sep 7, 2002
1,744
6
0
victoria
that's why we have all the supposed school shootings in the states
most people consider a school with their children sanctimonial ground
you cant cut deeper than that if you are trying to create reform
Translation for those who didn't get what he is saying. The school shootings in the US are all fake, designed to create an atmosphere in which the Obama administration can take away guns from the righteous. I am not sure if they never happened, were carried out by patsies set up by the CIA/Democratic Party/Whoever, or what the theory is beyond that. You would have to google the conspiracy nut sites to find out more.
 

cherise

lounge access denied :(
Aug 6, 2012
1,147
3
0
58
The age is a property of the individuals, it doesn't have a numeric value in itself. Just think of it as a token, and group people based on what token corresponds to them. And from that you can figure out which token is the average one.

For example, if you had a group of 100 people, and 99 of them were 1 year old, and the last one was 100 years old. Their average age wouldn't be 50, it would be 1. The 100 year old would just be a massive outlier of the group as a whole, and you can't use that to infer a general property (in this case, age).
actually, using your example, the average age would be either 1 or 2 depending on which method you use the mean average being 2 yrs old ,and both median and mode being 1 yr old
 

CJ Tylers

Retired Sr. Member
Jan 3, 2003
1,643
1
0
46
North Vancouver
^ ...

I was about to make a joke about your response, Cherise, then I remembered that in some places... 1+ *is* considered fair game by the sickest scum of the earth, and that kind of bummed me out and put a damper on any jocularity.
 
Vancouver Escorts