like you owe them anything?
...TROLL ALERT...
well i guess i was part of the 'tough crowd'
i don't mind of somebody wants to protect another party, but if you want to do so, then ask the question in a 'theoretical' way. like this, "if a person was at an mp and LE pushed their way in, if that person gave LE some of their personal information, would there be any unpleasant repercussions?"
that way no names need be given because it is a theoretical question... and nobody will then get curious about who it might have been, because it was nobody.
but the op didn't ask the question that way, they asked it suggesting that it was an event that happened recently, to them. of course posters are going to get curious, and collectively they will dig out the facts. for op to try to retreat behind a veil of anonymity to 'protect' the reputation of the mp is just... well... ummmm... trollish!
i don't have a problem with 'newbies' (if they are indeed new, not just posting under another name) making some innocent blunders, but the op committed some serious blunders in logic, and that i do have a problem with
think before you post, maybe that should read think well before you post
and don't come whinging to me in pm about what i post, if you don't like it, say it here in the forum in front of everybody