I think that's a very fair and reasonable opinion.
I personallt don't care if he used PED's (granted kinda odd in golf) because the majority of athletes in all sports have used (professional level) At this point I don't even care to discuss who's used and who hasn't. They almost all say they haven't but guess what, they aren't all telling the truth. Although I do believe John Daly when he says he hasn't

ound:
To me PED's are a non-issue in all sports. You really think the NFL doesn't know their dudes are using? :doh:
Well, I think PED's are causing major problems in sports nowadays. Look at the concussions in every major contact sport. This is a direct result of the larger, stronger, more muscled athletes. NHL and NFL are going to have to make MAJOR adjustments to their games when more data comes out about the long-term impact of repeated concussions. With golf, what about the Tiger rule changes at Augusta. What happens if somebody invents a cream where somebody can regularly launch a drive 375-400 yards.
I don't have any data to back it, just my opinion based on the timing. Even in baseball, players didn't do things like lift weights till sometime in the 90's. The common belief was that weight-lifting would negatively impact agility. I think that weight-lifting routine in the PGA was later, and was pretty much started by Tiger. Makes sense to me that he would be the first to also use PED's. If so, he had an unfair advantage during some of his best years.
If the playing field is level, all players are using equal HGH, equal steriods, equal horse tranquilizer shots, etc maybe its okay within a year. But I don't like the idea of using them for the impact on historical comparisons.
Was a big Tiger fan when I thought we just was superior with his abilities, work-ethic, mental toughness, dedication, overcoming the racial barriers. So many things. Little bit of hero worship. Then the hero was outed. Now I don't like him and root against him every chance I get.