You see, I've been reading reviews today and the reviews of the low priced girls (amp or not) are at least 50% negative. I do understand they're cheap, and that is the main draw, but honestly I am so confused by this because when I read these reviews all I think is wouldn't it be better to spend a bit more and have a great time than spend less and have a shitty time? If you can afford $300/mo only wouldn't you feel more fulfilled if you had one really great appointment vs 2 okay appointments? (or worse)
Some of the asian girls have really good reviews and they are consistently well-reviewed, so I get that part

But what about all these girls that seem hit or miss? What makes a man choose to go see them and play russian roulette as it were rather than go to someone that he will have a much better chance of having a good time. Is it a thrill of seeing if you can be the one guy she services well? Or maybe you don't actually mind seeing girls you rate 6/7 and so once in a while getting a 4/5 is okay...?
Please do NOT turn this into a micro vs indy thread, or personal comments towards me or other indys about rates. This is not a thread about rates at all, I actually just really want to know because I am amazed by how many bad, or at least less than great, reviews there are of the lower priced girls. This is about my curiosity, and I would have had the same question if I were not an escort myself after reading all those reviews today.
And I know the argument that pooners feel hesitant to post negative reviews of indys on the boards because the girls are here too...but there are indys who are not on the boards that get reviewed and it is the same for all of us whether we are advertisers, posters, or not on the boards at all...the ratio of positive to negative reviews is much more favourable than the lower-priced girls.