A Festive Season to all perberts who may see this!:
Some posts ago, a newbie asked me, of all posters, for tips on how to avoid getting caught by significant others, law enforcement, and the like. Since his request, we have seen Bill C36 enacted, and the game if one can call it that has changed somewhat. The bill seeks to target the johns, and we know who they are, but it seeks to define WHAT they are. Be advised, we are up there next to terrorists and mad bombers as Public Enemies. Not sure of the number yet . . . I don't think we rate as Public Enemy #1.
A few words of comfort to my fellow scoundrels in the new pillory of shame. SPs are not the target, nor will they ever be. The key word in the legislation as explained to me by one of the legal beagles consulted during its draft stages, is the "commodification of sex." This is where the legislation will fail if a proposed test case makes its way to the Supreme Court. Since when did an intimate act between two consenting adults become a commodity? Just like the law itself, an act is no more a commodity than Father Christmas is a merchant. It is probably on this point that the legislation, once reviewed, will fail.
Between now and then, be comforted by the reassurance of local Law Enforcement that they will be selective in enforcing the new law as it pertains to the exploitation of those too young to work in the sex trade, and those seeking to lure them into the trade by force or impairment.
Some posts ago, a newbie asked me, of all posters, for tips on how to avoid getting caught by significant others, law enforcement, and the like. Since his request, we have seen Bill C36 enacted, and the game if one can call it that has changed somewhat. The bill seeks to target the johns, and we know who they are, but it seeks to define WHAT they are. Be advised, we are up there next to terrorists and mad bombers as Public Enemies. Not sure of the number yet . . . I don't think we rate as Public Enemy #1.
A few words of comfort to my fellow scoundrels in the new pillory of shame. SPs are not the target, nor will they ever be. The key word in the legislation as explained to me by one of the legal beagles consulted during its draft stages, is the "commodification of sex." This is where the legislation will fail if a proposed test case makes its way to the Supreme Court. Since when did an intimate act between two consenting adults become a commodity? Just like the law itself, an act is no more a commodity than Father Christmas is a merchant. It is probably on this point that the legislation, once reviewed, will fail.
Between now and then, be comforted by the reassurance of local Law Enforcement that they will be selective in enforcing the new law as it pertains to the exploitation of those too young to work in the sex trade, and those seeking to lure them into the trade by force or impairment.
Last edited:






