Where did Canada go wrong?

80watts

Well-known member
May 20, 2004
3,359
1,272
113
Victoria
Looking at some Canadian history, after WW2 it seems Canada was gonna be big. Everyone had jobs, the Avro Arrow was made in the early 60s. By the 70s major industrys were being abandoned (heavy manufacturing); and then from there Canada has spiraled down a tube of nothing and seem to be going nowhere.
What happened?
The world economy? High Canadian wages.

Looking at European neighbours, we don't have any type of military to talk about in term of equipment, we rent tankers and tanks from other countries(ok 1 tanker and some tanks for Afghanistan), because we can't afford to make our own.
The last major piece of equipment desinged and brought was the Canadian Patrol Frigate and the naval reserve minesweeper (designed in the 80s and made in the 90s); CF-18 are made in the US. The tanks come from Germany (although I would like to see the latest version of the Lepard tank The L2A8). It seems any major equipement order just gets screwed over and Canada gets the short end of the stick for equipement because of budgets or they can't afford it.

That piece of shit military vehicle built in Kelowna, because it was the only one that could be produced in Kelowna (sorry Canada), but really couldn't go offroad. It was tested in Ottawa in the late 80s and was the least favourite of the vehicles tested. The minesweepers the Naval reserves got, to save money they decided to cut about 20 ft from the hull, which resulted in a slower speed. Until the HMCS Protectuer burned up in an engine room fire, the replacement tanker was always on the books for 30 years(different designs but no political will to get a new one). With the fire (and loss of the ship) the naval brass thought they had reason to get new ships.... Still no replacement for the tanker. The one they have on their website looks good; but it requires a 4 post system to adequately RAS at sea with other ships. They are trying to do too much for just one ship and the idea will fail in practicality. Fueling, Container, helicopter, Supplies. Keep it simple stupid. The Canadian government doesn't get it. To build ships you have to build them every year (or second year) and make upgrades; not making 12 ships every fucken 25 year in a 6 year span. You lose expertise, knowledge and lose on inovation for ship building. This also applies to industry.

Get 3 or 4 tanker/oiler types like the Americans, give it a CODOG system for economy. Then get something like the American have an Amphibious Assualt ships that can carry many helicopters (maybe some Ospreys and F-35Bs). This way the airforce and army chip in..... Whether it carries more aircraft or more hovercrafts depends on the mission. But the missions the Canadian Navy is likely to take on is humanitarian (after a earthquake or disaster). Hovercraft are the ideal ship type to have to go from a supply ship to shore. Just like if you have a boarding party, repelling by heliocopter is faster (and looks cooler) then trying to board another ship by an dingy....imagine climbing up a 15-20 foot ladder before you get onboard the ship you are boarding, and have to be helped aboard.....thats a fail in any fucken book..... To tell the truth the military is all about "professionalism", but the reality is that is about an ostrich burying its head in the dirt. The people are good, but the equipment is shit. It all comes down to budget.....

Most ships are "a slow boat to china" ; if your ship is not going to do 30 knots you can't stay up with the rest of the NATO fleet. The problem with 30 knots is the fuel consumption. Canada can't afford to have a 30 knot supply ship. It also gets to the destination quicker for missions.

Personally I go with a nuclear reactor and steam turbine, why, the tankers could scream about the ocean all day at 30 + knots and people could water ski all they want.... I can already hear the tree-huggers squeezing on their trees.....

If the military looks like a piece of crap, then the civilian side looks worse.
-Most resource seem to be sold off raw to other countries from logs and minerals and other natural resources like coal, natural gas. I just have to wonder why our country is getting raped from it natural resources without getting something back in the long term for non-renewalable resources.
-People involved with these things just shut up and are thankful that they have a job. Don't want to cause any waves. But they settle for road bumps....Or they are getting enough money to keep their mouth shut.....
Well....the thing is nobody across the world knows who Canadians are anymore.

Pls note the Inuit will be speaking Chinese in the near future..... Irony......
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Billiam

Mrmotorscooter

Well-known member
Dec 19, 2017
1,606
2,459
113
Looking at some Canadian history, after WW2 it seems Canada was gonna be big. Everyone had jobs, the Avro Arrow was made in the early 60s. By the 70s major industrys were being abandoned (heavy manufacturing); and then from there Canada has spiraled down a tube of nothing and seem to be going nowhere.
What happened?
The world economy? High Canadian wages.

Looking at European neighbours, we don't have any type of military to talk about in term of equipment, we rent tankers and tanks from other countries(ok 1 tanker and some tanks for Afghanistan), because we can't afford to make our own.
The last major piece of equipment desinged and brought was the Canadian Patrol Frigate and the naval reserve minesweeper (designed in the 80s and made in the 90s); CF-18 are made in the US. The tanks come from Germany (although I would like to see the latest version of the Lepard tank The L2A8). It seems any major equipement order just gets screwed over and Canada gets the short end of the stick for equipement because of budgets or they can't afford it.

That piece of shit military vehicle built in Kelowna, because it was the only one that could be produced in Kelowna (sorry Canada), but really couldn't go offroad. It was tested in Ottawa in the late 80s and was the least favourite of the vehicles tested. The minesweepers the Naval reserves got, to save money they decided to cut about 20 ft from the hull, which resulted in a slower speed. Until the HMCS Protectuer burned up in an engine room fire, the replacement tanker was always on the books for 30 years(different designs but no political will to get a new one). With the fire (and loss of the ship) the naval brass thought they had reason to get new ships.... Still no replacement for the tanker. The one they have on their website looks good; but it requires a 4 post system to adequately RAS at sea with other ships. They are trying to do too much for just one ship and the idea will fail in practicality. Fueling, Container, helicopter, Supplies. Keep it simple stupid. The Canadian government doesn't get it. To build ships you have to build them every year (or second year) and make upgrades; not making 12 ships every fucken 25 year in a 6 year span. You lose expertise, knowledge and lose on inovation for ship building. This also applies to industry.

Get 3 or 4 tanker/oiler types like the Americans, give it a CODOG system for economy. Then get something like the American have an Amphibious Assualt ships that can carry many helicopters (maybe some Ospreys and F-35Bs). This way the airforce and army chip in..... Whether it carries more aircraft or more hovercrafts depends on the mission. But the missions the Canadian Navy is likely to take on is humanitarian (after a earthquake or disaster). Hovercraft are the ideal ship type to have to go from a supply ship to shore. Just like if you have a boarding party, repelling by heliocopter is faster (and looks cooler) then trying to board another ship by an dingy....imagine climbing up a 15-20 foot ladder before you get onboard the ship you are boarding, and have to be helped aboard.....thats a fail in any fucken book..... To tell the truth the military is all about "professionalism", but the reality is that is about an ostrich burying its head in the dirt. The people are good, but the equipment is shit. It all comes down to budget.....

Most ships are "a slow boat to china" ; if your ship is not going to do 30 knots you can't stay up with the rest of the NATO fleet. The problem with 30 knots is the fuel consumption. Canada can't afford to have a 30 knot supply ship. It also gets to the destination quicker for missions.

Personally I go with a nuclear reactor and steam turbine, why, the tankers could scream about the ocean all day at 30 + knots and people could water ski all they want.... I can already hear the tree-huggers squeezing on their trees.....

If the military looks like a piece of crap, then the civilian side looks worse.
-Most resource seem to be sold off raw to other countries from logs and minerals and other natural resources like coal, natural gas. I just have to wonder why our country is getting raped from it natural resources without getting something back in the long term for non-renewalable resources.
-People involved with these things just shut up and are thankful that they have a job. Don't want to cause any waves. But they settle for road bumps....Or they are getting enough money to keep their mouth shut.....
Well....the thing is nobody across the world knows who Canadians are anymore.

Pls note the Inuit will be speaking Chinese in the near future..... Irony......
Even with all the incompetence and warts, Canada still manages to be the number 1 Country in the world, I’ll take it, there is no other place I would rather live and I thank my lucky stars I am a Canadian Citizen!

http://www.wbiw.com/2021/04/16/canada-ranked-the-number-no-1-country-in-the-world/
 

licks2nite

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
1,222
257
83
Canada went wrong with a mind set at the end of World War II. That winners in a war shouldn't have to be supplying products to the world. That the world should supply winners with products, sort of like the spoils of war.
 

angry anderson

Well-known member
Nov 8, 2014
1,963
2,274
113
Canada went wrong with a mind set at the end of World War II. That winners in a war shouldn't have to be supplying products to the world. That the world should supply winners with products, sort of like the spoils of war.
WW2 was the first war, recently where the winners suffered 80% of the total casualties, and 80% of those were civilians. We turned the Japanese and the Germans into the recipients of more goodwill donations than the Salvation Army. Then we decided to quit making anything and ship all the manufacturing overseas. A country without a manufacturing base is fucked. Just ask China.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sybian

Ray

Well-known member
Dec 21, 2005
1,254
347
83
vancouver
Canadians started parroting the rhetoric from the south of our border and decided high wages with benefits were a horrible thing. So society declared war on unions and drove wages down. Eliminated pensions. Then started sending manufacturing to cheaper countries.
A segment of society decided resource extraction was a horrible thing. So the mining industry was boycotted and shut down.
Then the forestry industry.
Now the oil and gas industry is being targetted.

Now our homes are being bought out from under us so our kids can't afford to live here. I don't know what the future holds.
 

sybian

Well-known member
Dec 23, 2014
3,620
966
113
Kamloops B.C.
Looking at some Canadian history, after WW2 it seems Canada was gonna be big. Everyone had jobs, the Avro Arrow was made in the early 60s. By the 70s major industrys were being abandoned (heavy manufacturing); and then from there Canada has spiraled down a tube of nothing and seem to be going nowhere.
What happened?
The world economy? High Canadian wages.

Looking at European neighbours, we don't have any type of military to talk about in term of equipment, we rent tankers and tanks from other countries(ok 1 tanker and some tanks for Afghanistan), because we can't afford to make our own.
The last major piece of equipment desinged and brought was the Canadian Patrol Frigate and the naval reserve minesweeper (designed in the 80s and made in the 90s); CF-18 are made in the US. The tanks come from Germany (although I would like to see the latest version of the Lepard tank The L2A8). It seems any major equipement order just gets screwed over and Canada gets the short end of the stick for equipement because of budgets or they can't afford it.

That piece of shit military vehicle built in Kelowna, because it was the only one that could be produced in Kelowna (sorry Canada), but really couldn't go offroad. It was tested in Ottawa in the late 80s and was the least favourite of the vehicles tested. The minesweepers the Naval reserves got, to save money they decided to cut about 20 ft from the hull, which resulted in a slower speed. Until the HMCS Protectuer burned up in an engine room fire, the replacement tanker was always on the books for 30 years(different designs but no political will to get a new one). With the fire (and loss of the ship) the naval brass thought they had reason to get new ships.... Still no replacement for the tanker. The one they have on their website looks good; but it requires a 4 post system to adequately RAS at sea with other ships. They are trying to do too much for just one ship and the idea will fail in practicality. Fueling, Container, helicopter, Supplies. Keep it simple stupid. The Canadian government doesn't get it. To build ships you have to build them every year (or second year) and make upgrades; not making 12 ships every fucken 25 year in a 6 year span. You lose expertise, knowledge and lose on inovation for ship building. This also applies to industry.

Get 3 or 4 tanker/oiler types like the Americans, give it a CODOG system for economy. Then get something like the American have an Amphibious Assualt ships that can carry many helicopters (maybe some Ospreys and F-35Bs). This way the airforce and army chip in..... Whether it carries more aircraft or more hovercrafts depends on the mission. But the missions the Canadian Navy is likely to take on is humanitarian (after a earthquake or disaster). Hovercraft are the ideal ship type to have to go from a supply ship to shore. Just like if you have a boarding party, repelling by heliocopter is faster (and looks cooler) then trying to board another ship by an dingy....imagine climbing up a 15-20 foot ladder before you get onboard the ship you are boarding, and have to be helped aboard.....thats a fail in any fucken book..... To tell the truth the military is all about "professionalism", but the reality is that is about an ostrich burying its head in the dirt. The people are good, but the equipment is shit. It all comes down to budget.....

Most ships are "a slow boat to china" ; if your ship is not going to do 30 knots you can't stay up with the rest of the NATO fleet. The problem with 30 knots is the fuel consumption. Canada can't afford to have a 30 knot supply ship. It also gets to the destination quicker for missions.

Personally I go with a nuclear reactor and steam turbine, why, the tankers could scream about the ocean all day at 30 + knots and people could water ski all they want.... I can already hear the tree-huggers squeezing on their trees.....

If the military looks like a piece of crap, then the civilian side looks worse.
-Most resource seem to be sold off raw to other countries from logs and minerals and other natural resources like coal, natural gas. I just have to wonder why our country is getting raped from it natural resources without getting something back in the long term for non-renewalable resources.
-People involved with these things just shut up and are thankful that they have a job. Don't want to cause any waves. But they settle for road bumps....Or they are getting enough money to keep their mouth shut.....
Well....the thing is nobody across the world knows who Canadians are anymore.

Pls note the Inuit will be speaking Chinese in the near future..... Irony......
We are known as peacekeepers.....but everyone knows, when it comes to fighting men, you better not piss off a Canuck.
It is said we will look the enemy in the eye, try to negotiate, ...then blow their freaking heads off.
Our military accomplishments are ignored by the world, yet we have attended the most renowned battles of history....and didn’t show up late for a war,.... like our southern allies.
On the world stage we may be in the shadow of the US as a military force, but when we attend a conflict, it is noticed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: masterblaster

masterblaster

Well-known member
May 19, 2004
1,984
1,219
113
Looking at some Canadian history, after WW2 it seems Canada was gonna be big. Everyone had jobs, the Avro Arrow was made in the early 60s. By the 70s major industrys were being abandoned (heavy manufacturing); and then from there Canada has spiraled down a tube of nothing and seem to be going nowhere.
What happened?
The world economy? High Canadian wages.

Looking at European neighbours, we don't have any type of military to talk about in term of equipment, we rent tankers and tanks from other countries(ok 1 tanker and some tanks for Afghanistan), because we can't afford to make our own.
The last major piece of equipment desinged and brought was the Canadian Patrol Frigate and the naval reserve minesweeper (designed in the 80s and made in the 90s); CF-18 are made in the US. The tanks come from Germany (although I would like to see the latest version of the Lepard tank The L2A8). It seems any major equipement order just gets screwed over and Canada gets the short end of the stick for equipement because of budgets or they can't afford it.

That piece of shit military vehicle built in Kelowna, because it was the only one that could be produced in Kelowna (sorry Canada), but really couldn't go offroad. It was tested in Ottawa in the late 80s and was the least favourite of the vehicles tested. The minesweepers the Naval reserves got, to save money they decided to cut about 20 ft from the hull, which resulted in a slower speed. Until the HMCS Protectuer burned up in an engine room fire, the replacement tanker was always on the books for 30 years(different designs but no political will to get a new one). With the fire (and loss of the ship) the naval brass thought they had reason to get new ships.... Still no replacement for the tanker. The one they have on their website looks good; but it requires a 4 post system to adequately RAS at sea with other ships. They are trying to do too much for just one ship and the idea will fail in practicality. Fueling, Container, helicopter, Supplies. Keep it simple stupid. The Canadian government doesn't get it. To build ships you have to build them every year (or second year) and make upgrades; not making 12 ships every fucken 25 year in a 6 year span. You lose expertise, knowledge and lose on inovation for ship building. This also applies to industry.

Get 3 or 4 tanker/oiler types like the Americans, give it a CODOG system for economy. Then get something like the American have an Amphibious Assualt ships that can carry many helicopters (maybe some Ospreys and F-35Bs). This way the airforce and army chip in..... Whether it carries more aircraft or more hovercrafts depends on the mission. But the missions the Canadian Navy is likely to take on is humanitarian (after a earthquake or disaster). Hovercraft are the ideal ship type to have to go from a supply ship to shore. Just like if you have a boarding party, repelling by heliocopter is faster (and looks cooler) then trying to board another ship by an dingy....imagine climbing up a 15-20 foot ladder before you get onboard the ship you are boarding, and have to be helped aboard.....thats a fail in any fucken book..... To tell the truth the military is all about "professionalism", but the reality is that is about an ostrich burying its head in the dirt. The people are good, but the equipment is shit. It all comes down to budget.....

Most ships are "a slow boat to china" ; if your ship is not going to do 30 knots you can't stay up with the rest of the NATO fleet. The problem with 30 knots is the fuel consumption. Canada can't afford to have a 30 knot supply ship. It also gets to the destination quicker for missions.

Personally I go with a nuclear reactor and steam turbine, why, the tankers could scream about the ocean all day at 30 + knots and people could water ski all they want.... I can already hear the tree-huggers squeezing on their trees.....

If the military looks like a piece of crap, then the civilian side looks worse.
-Most resource seem to be sold off raw to other countries from logs and minerals and other natural resources like coal, natural gas. I just have to wonder why our country is getting raped from it natural resources without getting something back in the long term for non-renewalable resources.
-People involved with these things just shut up and are thankful that they have a job. Don't want to cause any waves. But they settle for road bumps....Or they are getting enough money to keep their mouth shut.....
Well....the thing is nobody across the world knows who Canadians are anymore.

Pls note the Inuit will be speaking Chinese in the near future..... Irony......
The Avro Arrow was built in the late 50’s actually. Project was canceled on Feb 20, 1959. A mistake from which the country never fully recovered in my opinion.
 

80watts

Well-known member
May 20, 2004
3,359
1,272
113
Victoria
Sorry was going on diefenbaker was still in office in the very early 60s.

Sybian I think you are mistaken the Canadian Soldier of today for your own invincibility. Given that the soldier is the core of any operation, in todays battlespace the Canadian soldier lacks the technology and equipment to do his job proper... So much so that I wish I had one of those elven cloaks from the Lord of the Rings to make me invisilbe in the modern battlefield.
Todays battlefield weapons of air burst munitions and fire supression rounds (now going to 50 mm canons with dual ammo load (easy switching)). Intelligence gathered by drones and air attack by drones. Drone swarming packs on positions, not to metion artillery accuracy (with multiple hits on same target, at same time, by the same gun), makes an individual soldier a sitting target. The need for better protective equipment is still needed. Camoflage and heat shielding materials are needed to deflect IR and cameras.
Then comes vehicles that can protect the soldier. Most are susceptable to IED and air attacks. Even tanks have a problem with air attacks (look at the A10) and artillery as the tanks are designed to take an attack from the front (with their slopped armour). Roof hits make tanks vulnerable. More battle field weapons are being designed for this. For a soldier to be on the ground the battlespace air must be controlled (or mostly controled), so that the soldier does not come to harm from the air. Then the soldier can practice the craft on the ground.
The reality Canadian Soldiers need better equipment and intelligence system and weapons systems (artillery and drones) to support on demand.
 

sybian

Well-known member
Dec 23, 2014
3,620
966
113
Kamloops B.C.
Sorry was going on diefenbaker was still in office in the very early 60s.

Sybian I think you are mistaken the Canadian Soldier of today for your own invincibility. Given that the soldier is the core of any operation, in todays battlespace the Canadian soldier lacks the technology and equipment to do his job proper... So much so that I wish I had one of those elven cloaks from the Lord of the Rings to make me invisilbe in the modern battlefield.
Todays battlefield weapons of air burst munitions and fire supression rounds (now going to 50 mm canons with dual ammo load (easy switching)). Intelligence gathered by drones and air attack by drones. Drone swarming packs on positions, not to metion artillery accuracy (with multiple hits on same target, at same time, by the same gun), makes an individual soldier a sitting target. The need for better protective equipment is still needed. Camoflage and heat shielding materials are needed to deflect IR and cameras.
Then comes vehicles that can protect the soldier. Most are susceptable to IED and air attacks. Even tanks have a problem with air attacks (look at the A10) and artillery as the tanks are designed to take an attack from the front (with their slopped armour). Roof hits make tanks vulnerable. More battle field weapons are being designed for this. For a soldier to be on the ground the battlespace air must be controlled (or mostly controled), so that the soldier does not come to harm from the air. Then the soldier can practice the craft on the ground.
The reality Canadian Soldiers need better equipment and intelligence system and weapons systems (artillery and drones) to support on demand.
Agreed.....but I’m not invincible, I’m just hard to kill.
I will admit ,we had to adapt to inferior munitions, and technology even in my time of service.
 

80watts

Well-known member
May 20, 2004
3,359
1,272
113
Victoria
Even with all the incompetence and warts, Canada still manages to be the number 1 Country in the world, I’ll take it, there is no other place I would rather live and I thank my lucky stars I am a Canadian Citizen!

http://www.wbiw.com/2021/04/16/canada-ranked-the-number-no-1-country-in-the-world/
Jesus, I hope you don't believe that fucken crap. The idea of being #1 is that we are all happy and like life.
Look at Aboringinals. I don't think they are happy. Unemployment rate is 7.5%. Covid is running rampant, with more intensive care beds being used now then the initial phase of spread in 2020.
It is springtime, thats a good thing. That a positive.
The economy sucks. Alberta is becoming a need province.
My thinking is everyone must be on drugs to answear an questionaire to be that positive... or about to get laid and will say anything....
The Arctic soveigntry is starting to heat up in the NW passage, and Canadian needs to be active up north very soon. Otherwise you will have chinese drilling rigs and mining colonies in our 200 mile economice zone down north (yup rivers travel north, thats downhill).

Maybe its the cheap real estate prices compared to the rest of the world. Which would mean that before people perferred those places (that were previously best in the world) and that is why their real estate is so high......:Do_O

I think Canada is a good country, but I know it can get and be an better place..... Go CANADA.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: billsfan2011

masterpoonhunter

"Marriage should be a renewable contract"
Sep 15, 2019
3,178
5,427
113
The Avro Arrow was built in the late 50’s actually. Project was canceled on Feb 20, 1959. A mistake from which the country never fully recovered in my opinion.
Canceling the Arrow was quite possibly the singularity in Canada climbing the ladder of world influence. If that project would have continued, Canada would have had an industrial military complex with all the surrounding industry to support it. The Arrow was a superior plane in every sense of the word at the time and it would have taken a huge bite out of the US military exports. The US knew it and put undue pressure on Canada to cancel the project. Kind of like a giant NRA reaching across a border to put political influence in play. Mind you we are very good at exporting jobs, you know, with our lumber etc, could have been an IKEA, with our minerals etc including rare earths could have been a semi conductor provider, etc etc etc. Canadian oil and gas should be used in country but no, have to import it from elsewhere, in a lot of cases refined. Its a pretty long list.
 

sybian

Well-known member
Dec 23, 2014
3,620
966
113
Kamloops B.C.
Jesus, I hope you don't believe that fucken crap. The idea of being #1 is that we are all happy and like life.
Look at Aboringinals. I don't think they are happy. Unemployment rate is 7.5%. Covid is running rampant, with more intensive care beds being used now then the initial phase of spread in 2020.
It is springtime, thats a good thing. That a positive.
The economy sucks. Alberta is becoming a need province.
My thinking is everyone must be on drugs to answear an questionaire to be that positive... or about to get laid and will say anything....
The Arctic soveigntry is starting to heat up in the NW passage, and Canadian needs to be active up north very soon. Otherwise you will have chinese drilling rigs and mining colonies in our 200 mile economice zone down north (yup rivers travel north, thats downhill).

Maybe its the cheap real estate prices compared to the rest of the world. Which would mean that before people perferred those places (that were previously best in the world) and that is why their real estate is so high......:Do_O

I think Canada is a good country, but I know it can get and be an better place..... Go CANADA.....
Yeah....but we still have the best beer on the planet.
 

g eazy

pretentious douche
Feb 15, 2018
872
706
93
Jesus, I hope you don't believe that fucken crap. The idea of being #1 is that we are all happy and like life.
Look at Aboringinals. I don't think they are happy. Unemployment rate is 7.5%. Covid is running rampant, with more intensive care beds being used now then the initial phase of spread in 2020.
It is springtime, thats a good thing. That a positive.
The economy sucks. Alberta is becoming a need province.
My thinking is everyone must be on drugs to answear an questionaire to be that positive... or about to get laid and will say anything....
The Arctic soveigntry is starting to heat up in the NW passage, and Canadian needs to be active up north very soon. Otherwise you will have chinese drilling rigs and mining colonies in our 200 mile economice zone down north (yup rivers travel north, thats downhill).

Maybe its the cheap real estate prices compared to the rest of the world. Which would mean that before people perferred those places (that were previously best in the world) and that is why their real estate is so high......:Do_O

I think Canada is a good country, but I know it can get and be an better place..... Go CANADA.....
You know.. you can be #1 (for whatever that subjective ranking is worth) and still have lots of things that can be improved.
 

licks2nite

Well-known member
Nov 30, 2006
1,222
257
83
Anatomy of a slow motion train wreak called the Canadian economy:

First the Boeing Aircraft Company where my grandfather worked during the war left Vancouver. Jorden television manufacturer left right away where my father employed hardly a year as sales agent, when television suddenly became available. News commentary repeatedly lamented lack of research & development in Canada. Zero in the west. AV Roe Aircraft Company disappeared from Ontario when PM Diefenbaker believed aircraft weren't necessary in the Cold War with ballistic missiles coming online. A hidden tax on manufacturing. Parliament stood idly by while US "right-to-work" sucked manufacturing jobs out of Canada. Canadian judiciary supported US trade union affiliated Canadian unions to price themselves out of their jobs and careers. "Free trade" treaties that sent the remaining foreign branch plants overseas. Canada, with no organic population increase, erects buildings to house oligarch immigrants who found ways to get rich polluting a continent and exploiting cheap overseas labour to bid up the price of Canadian real estate and send Canadians to commute hours away from loved ones, on their own time, to and from low paying careers and jobs.
 

happycanuck99

Sucker for a smile! :)
Jun 28, 2018
321
380
63
I'm not disagreeing with any of this, but I still feel a little happiness when I see that Canadian flag on the Canadarm. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: sybian

Big Dick Bob

Sloppy blowjob connoisseur
Mar 15, 2019
458
666
93
Unfortunately that 8 years where Stephen Harper tried to be an oil baron did some real damage to Canada's future economic prospects.

It forced Justin Trudeau to buy a leaky oil pipeline so we wouldn't get sued into the stone age by the Chinese.
 

SeekSteadyRegSP

Active member
Feb 9, 2005
775
101
43
Where did Canada go wrong?
It was that idiotic wager on the metric system, done entirely because it believed that the U.S. would follow suit.

Once Sault Ste Marie, ON was perhaps 3 miles from Sault Ste Marie, MI and now the difference is from here to the moon.
 

masterblaster

Well-known member
May 19, 2004
1,984
1,219
113
Unfortunately that 8 years where Stephen Harper tried to be an oil baron did some real damage to Canada's future economic prospects.

It forced Justin Trudeau to buy a leaky oil pipeline so we wouldn't get sued into the stone age by the Chinese.
i don’t think the Trans Mountain pipeline actually leaks.
 
Vancouver Escorts