As you write at the bottom of your posts, "A person's got to know their limitations." In your case, you are making psychological conclusions about a person (Misty) with little evidence. This may sound great to the uninitiated but you've really gone beyond your knowledge base. A second problem with this is that you contrive to make your analysis and diagnosis with such absolute confidence. Are there any possible alternatives to your analysis? Slow down and try dealing with the objective facts at your disposal and perhaps with less arrogance. In addition, using terms like "transfers". "introspection", "character defects", "voices of the past", "childhood issues" and "self-awareness" really does make you sound like a frustrated psychologist with a diagnosis to sell.