I am moreso referring to reviews that lack any helpful information rather than negative ones. It is frustrating when I am searching for information about a potential service provider and come across reviews that provide no useful details.
What makes a bad or useless review
- Thread starter vitaminD
- Start date
If it lacks details on the photographs in ad being recent or accurate depictions of their present physical state. Women take photos of themselves seventeen times a day but post ads with photos from pre Covid lockdowns and get upset when we walk.
Last edited:
Some people just write endorsements pretending to be reviews and disregard this: Reviews vs. Ads
This right here. Im actually booked in to see a touring SP who looks very attractive, who is visiting here in a couple weeks time, her rates are quite high. I didnt do a deep dive until I was booked it, and upon viewing the gallery section of her website, I see all her photos that she uses on her ads and social media are labeled as being taken in 2020-2021 which is a significant amount of time ago.someone's body and face can undergo significant changes in that time frame. Therefore, I am contemplating cancelling the appointment.
I often come across comments and reviews from guys saying, "I saw her a few years ago and her body was amazing." However, it's crucial to acknowledge that a lot can change in just a year or two. In fact, I have personally witnessed people in my own life who have gained weight and become somewhat overweight in just a matter of months.
Id also add, If the provider you are reviewing is aware of your perb account username, we all know we arent getting an objective or unbiased review from you.
Well certainly the last few months in particular, the number of brand new perbites gushing over this SP or that one saying it was the best time they have ever had and just go and see her.
As their first ever post in the forum.
I would say that makes for a pretty poor review.
Every review should contain at least these basics - Rates and services provided. General description of provider. Relative location and condition of incall. If pictures in ads are real/fake or representative.
Agreed , although to be fair there’s a mind blowing amount of new accounts in the last 6-10 months . Many are definitely real cause they post 411 questions in all the wrong sections , that they could have found the answers to in 5 minutes themselves but instead just make a quick post so they can be spoon fed the info instead.
Then there are all the new accounts that are all flocking over the newest MP’s and newest providers .
Him:
“I won’t go into the details about what transpired between us, but I had a great time. Treat her right guys !”
Me:
“I won’t go into the details about what transpired between us, but I had a great time. Treat her right guys !”
Me:
Can't understand w why anyone would tell a provider his perb handle ?
Agree these "won't go into details " are a waste of bandwidth.Him:
“I won’t go into the details about what transpired between us, but I had a great time. Treat her right guys !”
Me:
I dont know why but some do.
theres also the guys who say stuff like "i saw her on this day and this time" its not hard for the SP to put two and two together, or atleast narrow down which guy wrote the review.
always best to wait a couple weeks before reviewing a girl you have just seen, and never specific the day you saw them .
also some of the agencies will know if you are the only guy who has seen a certain combination of girls.
Discounts, preferential treatment, collusion.
Yeah, it's a pisser when I read that too. Especially from a "new member" that just joined the same day just to make that post.Him:
“I won’t go into the details about what transpired between us, but I had a great time. Treat her right guys !”
Me:
To be honest, there really isn't any great need to go into details because 'mileage' is a reality that doesn't apply to everyone. A passionate review could go into great detail about their experiences (makes for good reading), yet half of what was said probably wouldn't apply to the next guy wanting that same experience. That first review was probably written by some GQ stud, young, fit and stylish... the next guy is probably an over-the-hill burn out with a dad-bod and a skin-tag in his armpit that's just weird to look at. You think that guy is going to get his world rocked as the first review said?
People simply want to know if the girl is real, professional, not judgemental, passionate, mentally stable, safe, and if the rates were on par with the service. And if the review was written by an established profile that knows what he's talking about. The rest is mileage, dependant on the chemistry between the client and the provider, and at that point any long drawn out story might as well be fan fiction, since its doubt any of that would apply to the next guy.
This made me laugh. very true.
I think you could also see the inverse, where the stud attractive guy thinks the girls kind of mid because he has experienced hotter girls before.
whereas the gross slob of a guy might give the girl extremely high ratings despite her not being into it and giving him mediocre service, because he lacks any experience with high calibre girls, or girls in general
Banned , banned and banned if caught.
It might take longer than we would hope for them to get the axe but the moderators are pretty good at tracking those guys
But I see the same guys reviewing or pushing the same MPs or micros at least weekly, if not daily.
The problem is how do you differentiate between a fan and a schill reliably, there’s a massage provider who has legions of white nights and there’s not a damn thing we can do about them. So has anyone got any suggestions how we can change things? There’s a half dozen sticky’s on advice how to write a useful review, we’ve tried leaving subtle hints, links to sticky’s, an optional review template, even sarcastic humour. And yet “ the sun shines out of her ass go see her” type of review dominates the forums. Before you ask we can’t rig the board so that new members have to read the sticky’s before they make there first post or start deleting reviews that don’t meet expectations but we will consider any suggestions made.
Sorry if I didn't understand it correctly but is it possible to make it so that each new post by a new member needs some sort of approval before it gets publicly posted. Many forums do that and only give full posting freedom after some time. I know this would increase the workload on existing mods but maybe we can have lower level new post moderators who either approve the new user post or flag it for more review by existing mods? That way lots of issues with posting in wrong forums, posting repeated questions, etc would be take care of?
The fan vs schill thing is pretty big. Many who have been here awhile and enjoy spending time on the forum certainly see those 'reviews'. And yeah its a fine line for anyone to outright call them on that or to make comments alluding to them.
In particular the poster who signed up a couple days prior and who gushes on visiting this also new SP or that one. Even though the mods and the posters alike may see that clearly, is it in the spirit of the forum to post something like "you moron, everyone here knows what you are doing, please FOaD". ?? Or something along those lines.
Thankfully the good moderators had the foresight to create the most powerful IGNORE button, something this pooner uses rather diligently.
