What benefits do Natives get?

D.W.B

Banned
Feb 18, 2005
240
0
0
Gone
No taxes on a job "on the reserve" but working off the reserve they do pay taxes ... but they get all kinds of tax breaks. Even if they are 1/16 Native or Metis or whatever they can get a Treaty Card and get these benefits.

And if they live on the Morley reserve near Calgary, they get about a $50,000 cash payment from their accumulated share of the oil and gas royalty when they turn 18. Equals: a $45,000 pickup truck, some booze, and the truck is totaled within the year. Priceless.

I don't blame them, what with having foetal alcohol syndrome and living in the 3rd world and all...

Oh, they also get free signs put up on the Transcanada Highway that say "Watch for Pedestrians" but that is code for "Watch of Pissed Natives Passing out on the Highway and getting run over by 20 or 30 semis".
What an asshole!
 

MissingOne

Don't just do something, sit there.
Jan 2, 2006
2,217
411
83
I guess they get a few benefits. We got quite a nifty continent out of the deal.
 

kweeezy

New member
Jun 6, 2007
16
0
1
Whether society chooses to see it or not, there is still discrimination against First Nations today. Some of the comments in this thread attest to that.

First Nations are still fighting treaties that were written in the 1700's and the beaurocratic machine in Ottawa seems to find ways to slow and slog through the whole process.
Reserve land that was granted by the Crown was continually infringed upon and the perpetrators were given a blind eye because it was 'only' the natives who suffered. This type of attitude still prevails and many wonder why some natives can't function in white man's world.
Many wish to regain their roots and heritage through practise and ritual. This has only been a recent renewel or renaaisance of sorts as my parents generation came from the age of shame. It was shameful to be an Indian when my father was growing up. He couldn't speak his language, grow his hair or practise his rituals.
Women's status rights were recognized as recent as 1985 and now the bloodlines may be traced maternally. Native children were taken from their parents in the 40's 50's 60's 70's and yes even the 80's and 90's and sent to foster homes and orphanages where for the most part many horror stories can be told as to how they were/are treated.
For those who say 'why can't natives today settle and accept what 'civilization' has brought?'. Consider that European "civilization" of the past came from a war mentality and greed, exploitation, and conquering were the legacy the they brought to this land. The only, ONLY way that Europeans were superior to the tribes living here was that of technology and their ability to wage war and that's it. Native's were more socially advanced as evidenced by their utopian societies and their little want or need of things material.
I quote from "We were not the savages" by Daniel L. Paul

"In 1988, the contribution establishing democracy in the world was acknowledged for the first time by a Euro American jurisdiction. During November of that year the Congress of the United States debated and passed a resolution recognizing that the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights were modelled to a large extent upon the tenets of the constitutions and bill of rights of the Iroquoian Nations and other Amerindian groups."

Many of my brothers and sisters are doing very well for themselves integrating in today's society. Unfortunately many are not. They tend to be the ones who have historically stayed on reserve land because the thought of 'bettering' themselves through education and ladder climbing in society means losing their status rights. Right or wrong it's still a fear, as real as getting a nice shipment of blankets from 'well meaning' charities.
 

D.W.B

Banned
Feb 18, 2005
240
0
0
Gone
I think Im aloud to start this because I am part Native LOL
(and no I don't collect any benifits)

*What do you call a group of indians sitting in a circle???

A full set of teeth!

*What is the difference between an indian funeral and an indian wedding???

One less drunk!

Anyone want to share some more native jokes?
Last week it was jokes about native children freezing to death and now this racist garbage.

Why is it that shit like this is so acceptable on perb and even considered funny?
 

hmm3030

addicted to love
Dec 3, 2007
73
0
0
I just thought I would clarify some misconceptions regarding First Nations and taxes.

First of all - well over 90% of working Frist Nations people pay taxes in the exact same manner as other Canadian citizens.

First nations are exempt for Income Tax if MORE THAN 90% of their income earning activity occurs on reserve. From 1996 onward, tenants of association was also introduced into the equation...meaning that simply working and generating income on reserve may not necessarily be sufficient to make one tax exepmt. Who the work was being done for (was it to benefit FN people), where the individual lived and banked, where the business was registered etc....also became determining factors in whether the income was to be taxed.

The vast majority of us work off of reseve land....and therefore pay our income tax/cpp/gst etc. just like everybody else.

In many cases First Nations people who do work ON reserve (my mother is an example) are also subjected to full tax rates. She works on reserve at a hospital (governmnent owned) which caters predominatly to First Nations people...but this is still not considered suffiienct to not be paying taxes on her income.

As you can see - this tax expemption works for such a miniscule precentage of First Nations people. The vast majority of us pay our full and fair share.

Up until 1996, GIC's which were registered to banks on reserve (and if invested 'in house') had the advantage of the derived income being tax exepmt (since it was after all earned on reserve). A 1996 ruling deemed even in house GIC's to be 'commercial mainstream' and therefore taxable at the regular rate.

The only other tax break which first nations people have is on purchases under the following circumstances; Items purchased on reserved, or delivered to reserve are exempt from taxes.

With the exception of large appliances/cars etc....the extra delivery charges/time are really not worth the savings - and very few of us take advantage of this savings.

Schooling: Yes, First Nations holding a status card (you now need to be a minimum of 25% to qualify - and NOT Metis) do have the advantage of having post secondarry education paid for. In my opinion, ANYBODY who maintins a high GPA should have this opportunity. However, the government sees fit to allow for Status First Nations to have theirs paid for. I'm sure it's not entirely aultristic. After all, assisting those who would normally be on government subsidy for the rest of their life to grow and become contributing tax payers is of benefit to everybody. People on social assistence - regarldess of their nationality, also get free training. Fair - perhaps not. Of benefit to the country in general - absolutley.

And for the record...not all of us take advantage of that. I utilized the free schooling for the first 3 years of my degree (though I had a scholorship which paid for most of it anyway....the government did make up the balance). Once I began working as a provider, my income was sufficient to pay for my own schooling. I paid my own way for my Fourth year, for my second degree, as well as for my Masters.

No, I have never been on social assistence, have never received government funding (other than partial payment for my first 3 years at uni), and DO pay all my taxes.....including my GST and CPP.
Very thoughtful reply. As someone who is 25% native descent I can assure that there are no significant tax breaks available to the vast majority of natives unless you are willing to live in the poor standards that predominate 90% of the reserves in Canada. Metis are eligible to receive the free post-secondary tuition as, by definition, they are 50% native.
 

Mr Blonde

Member
Nov 3, 2003
349
9
18
49
i'm getting a bit long winded here. i'll keep going, maybe it's the egomaniac in me, but it seems like a good read. ;)

getting down to my subject title of me pretty much being disowned, it came down to my aunt and i sitting down one night while she was visiting with my parents.

when i think of it, "disowned" isn't the right word, but it's the first word that comes to mind. since our little conversation things haven't been the same between my aunt and i. or any of my other relatives on reserve for that matter.

the way i honestly see it is there should be a sink or swim decision for todays indians.

i say wipe out reserves.

i say wipe out free education.

i say wipe out land claims.

i say we march into victoria and say "all the shit that's happened. residential schools, the raping of our culture, the broken promises....fughetaboutit."

"You people." see the services we have access to as "benifits" when in reality they are more or less an anchor. The percentage of Indians who actually graduate from high school, let alone go on to a college or university is pretty miniscule.

The way I see it there are three kinds of indians. (all jokes aside here folks.)

1.) You have your indian who manages to finish high school, get admitted into a post secondary institution, go through all the red tape and somehow come out the other side with a degree or certification of some sort. They go on to find employment (i hesitate to use the term success.) in their field and may or may not live on reserve.

2.) You have your run of the mill, straight and narrow Indian. He or she may or may not have graduated from high school. But chances are they live on reserve. They have a job either "working for whitey" (seriously folks, that's a term that's used) or they work for the tribe/band in one form or another.

3.) You have your stereotypical Indian. He or she hasn't graduated from high school, perhaps didn't even GET to high school. There's an alcohol/drug problem in the picture. Numerous run in's with the police. Every single Indian joke in the WORLD is based on this guy, or gal.

Your type 1 and 2 indians could get by in the world. they would keep on keepin' on. some would do alright, others not so alright. just like any other class/culture in the world. it's the type 3 indians that give me the whole "sink or swim" mentality.

Like i mentioned before all i can tell you is about what i know and see. And i see the Indians with drug and alcohol problems stuck in this vicious circle. They either come from families with a history of substance abuse, or they've just happened upon it based on decisions made years ago.

i know some who are conditioned to be hateful/mistrustful towards non-indians. they are taught from an early age that "whitey" is responsible for the lives they have to lead. and in turn anyone who works for "whitey" is the same way. there's a resentment towards those who aren't like them. we all know the stereo-type.

the fucked up thing about this. is there are indians out there who are tired of being on reserves. who want to quit drugs. who want to quit alcohol.

they
just
lack
the
resources.

and before you jump down my throat on this...hear me out.

say you live on a reserve. you get a welfare check every month. you walk into town to cash it at the bank, maybe buy groceries for your kids, but more than likely just buy booze or get a fix.

one day you wake up and realize that there's got to be more to life than this. you reach out and somehow you get clean. you come home, and look for a job. but lo' and behold you cant find one. either because you've had one too many run ins with the law, or you live so deep in the reserve that it's difficult to get to work on time.

maybe you stick it out for awhile. but over time you get worn down. it's easier to sit on a reserve and venture into town once a month on that special Wednesday than it is to walk to and from work every for what amounts to more or less minimum wage. eventually you wind up back where you started. strung out, in trouble with the cops, or if you've been through the wringer enough times...dead.

the scenario is the same for any other class and culture. i realize that. i am honestly just tired of seeing a culture given so many opportunities to rise up and become something more reducing itself to pointing the finger and wallowing in substance abuse.

in this case it's true that one bad apple spoils the whole damn bunch.

with the eradication of reserves the decision of going out and getting clean, or getting an education, or living a LIFE would be less of a decision and more of a necessity. speaking in terms of an addiction, you can't get clean until you hit rock bottom. eradicating reserves would take the floor out from under ALOT of people, and rock bottom would come zooming up on you pretty fast.

getting back to the whole "benefits" idea, i just can't see the government throwing a bunch of money at "us" as something that will heal or fix anything. spiritually, materialistically or otherwise.

getting a free education didn't make my mother forget about going to a residential school.

a billion dollar land claim settlement isn't going to change the fact that there will still be indians hooked on crack and drinking rice wine.

for me what it all comes down to is forgiveness. there is a nation of people who are stuck in the past, and banging on this gigantic drum looking for compensation. waiting for a check from publishers clearing house that ISN'T going to come. i see a people who are capable of such beauty, but seem so content to sit back and watch their culture crawl towards extinction.

if we could just sit back and say 'fuhghetaboutit' and MOVE ON there could be something more. we could be something more. the kids i have someday could listen to the stories of how we overcame all this evil simply by letting go. simply sitting in the knowledge of knowing we never heard an apology, but still had the balls to say "its okay, i forgive you."

its this world i want to live in, but will never see.

just to finish on a light hearted kind of tone....

....why don't indians like sushi?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
because sometimes sushi shits her pants. ;)
 

aznboi9

Don't mind me...
May 3, 2005
1,380
3
38
Here Be Monsters
Thanks Lady Companion and Mr. Blonde. Those were very well articulated and thoughtful posts.
 

kickback

New member
Oct 4, 2007
166
0
0
How about those lawyers

Here's a fact that most Canadians don't know but should know;

75% of all tax dollars that are directed to the First Nations people goes to lawyers. These are white lawyers with offices in downtown corporate towers making a very good income representing people they would never have to their home.

I'm a native Canadian (not First Nations) and disgusted by this waste of money. It will go on for generations and eventually get to 99%. Little kids are growing up on reserves with a bleek future - these kids deserve better.
 

LonelyGhost

Telefunkin
Apr 26, 2004
3,935
0
0
First of all, I hope no one takes any offense to this, but this question has been running in my mind for a while.
With all the refugees who come to Canada that have had horrible life experiences (from jews escaping the holocaust, Vietnamese/ Cambodian boat people escaping communism to others escaping totalitarian states) most of them seem to adjust and even become successful here in Canada.
So many First Nations do not. I realize that the 50's & 60's were not kind to the native people but that was years ago.
Is it because so many are stuck on reserves?
If any one else has other reasons I'd like to hear them.
1. Aboriginals living on reserves cannot get business loans to start
any kind of business that would help them get ahead ... its actually
easier for a refugee to get money from a bank or government than
it is for an Aboriginal.

2. While we hear all about how badly women were treated and how
their contribution to the War effort was never recognized or how badly
the Japanese were treated in WWll, you don't hear about all the
Aboriginals who fought for Canada but who, if they lived on reserves
and kept their 'status' were NOT given the right to vote until 1960!!!

3. Aboriginal men who marry 'other' women retain their status the
women they marry can gain 'status' but an Aboriginal woman who
marries an non-Aboriginal loses her status ...

Which is very problematic in Aboriginal culture because lineage was
matrilineal ...

4. A lot of Aboriginals after being exploited by Europeans have now
been even more exploited by their own people ... there is no end to
the number of 'Band Chiefs' who have spent the money that was intended
to help Aboriginals.

5. Much of the money spent on 'Aboriginals' is spent on bureaucracy
and lawyers.

Think Aboriginals have it 'good'?

Highest rate of suicide, homicide, TB, diabetes, HIV/Aids, alcoholism,
drug addiction and incarceration.

More Canadians have a computer in their homes than Aboriginals have
toilets!!!!

Many Aboriginal homes do not even have heating and have been
built to sub-standard conditions.
 

Akitasam

New member
Feb 14, 2005
83
0
0
It's simple. The strongest survive. I have no problem helping those who need it. But if you abuse drugs, alcohol or don't want to better your situation you should be given nothing. Its a waste of money and a waste of life. It really is sad.
 

humanfly009

New member
Nov 27, 2004
63
0
0
If it wasn't for the rest of the world, the Indians would still be living off the land, shitting in holes in the ground, sleeping on dirt, using leaves to heal wounds, and have a life expectancy of 45. Let's face it, they have no motivation...whether we came and concured, or not...

Empathy for people who are indifferent and users...bah...
........ You say that like its a bad thing? If you grew up into that sort of a society, you'd be so accustommed to it. Why should we live for 100 years. 100 years of pure consumerism. What sort of quality do we have when were 98 years old living in a hospital with tubes stuck in us shitting our pants.
 

Thatotherguy

Active member
Jan 31, 2008
1,132
12
38
1. Aboriginals living on reserves cannot get business loans to start
any kind of business that would help them get ahead ... its actually
easier for a refugee to get money from a bank or government than
it is for an Aboriginal.
That may be true as far as getting start-up money from the government, but I'm skeptical that it's any easier for a refugee to get a bank loan than it is for an aboriginal living on a reserve. The only way that would be the case would be if the aboriginal on the reserve had a really bad credit rating; bad enough that it looks worse than the refugee's complete lack of any credit rating.
2. While we hear all about how badly women were treated and how
their contribution to the War effort was never recognized or how badly
the Japanese were treated in WWll, you don't hear about all the
Aboriginals who fought for Canada but who, if they lived on reserves
and kept their 'status' were NOT given the right to vote until 1960!!!
That's true, but it doesn't really speak to what the current problems are that marginalize aboriginals (other than contributing to a negative mindset).
3. Aboriginal men who marry 'other' women retain their status the
women they marry can gain 'status' but an Aboriginal woman who
marries an non-Aboriginal loses her status ...

Which is very problematic in Aboriginal culture because lineage was
matrilineal ...
I knew that non-aboriginal women marrying aboriginal men could gain status (I have a cousin who married an aboriginal man and gained status in this way), but I had no idea that aboriginal women marrying non-aboriginal men lost their status. That's fucked up. Of course I'm of the opinion that official status (I'm talking about being recognized by the government as being different enough to have different rules apply - I'm not talking about the cultural aspects) should be done away with, since I actually feel that it's a form of apartheid that, in the long run, is actually the root of many of the problems with modern aboriginal culture. The problem is that you can't just sweep away that status without spending a lot of money and effort to address the current problems, so it would be a long-term goal that would take decades for the government to achieve (if it was done properly, and if the government showed a desire to do it).
4. A lot of Aboriginals after being exploited by Europeans have now
been even more exploited by their own people ... there is no end to
the number of 'Band Chiefs' who have spent the money that was intended
to help Aboriginals.

5. Much of the money spent on 'Aboriginals' is spent on bureaucracy
and lawyers.
IMO, these are the biggest reasons why marginalization of aboriginals continues. They certainly aren't the original cause of that marginalization, but from what I've seen, they're probably the biggest obstacle when looking at ways to bring aboriginals as a whole into modern Canadian society without destroying the culture.
Think Aboriginals have it 'good'?

Highest rate of suicide, homicide, TB, diabetes, HIV/Aids, alcoholism,
drug addiction and incarceration.

More Canadians have a computer in their homes than Aboriginals have
toilets!!!!

Many Aboriginal homes do not even have heating and have been
built to sub-standard conditions.
I think this is something that most Canadians don't understand, or at least those living in the lower mainland in BC. I know I didn't understand it until relatively recently (I learned it after talking to my cousin's husband, whose band is up north). I grew up living about a mile from a reserve in the lower mainland. The living conditions there were pretty comparable to the living conditions outside the reserve. Not comparable to the best part of town off the reserve, but certainly better than the worst part of town off the reserve. I always assumed that was the norm. Heck, my cousin and her husband live on a reserve where the living conditions are great. It's a really nice neighborhood. I realize now that the main reason for that is that those reserves were right beside non-reserve communities, with good access to amenities. Many reserves don't have that advantage. Many are very isolated from major population centres. In those reserves, the living conditions are frequently what you would expect from a third world country, especially if the band chief and/or council is corrupt.

I'm not sure if I had a point to any of this post... :confused:
 

70sBratski

New member
Sep 5, 2006
40
0
0
Although there are a few thought provoking and insightful posts on this thread, I do not see the point in continuing this racist thread. Some of you people are just ignorant.

And.... I am not stupid enough to think that some natives do not have issues - of course they do. What some people are not acknowleging in this thread is that non-natives have a lot of the same issues. Because of the rampant racism displayed today in society, these issues are only discussed in a negative way towards natives.

Look at the rest of the population and how they live before you judge.
 
Last edited:

kweeezy

New member
Jun 6, 2007
16
0
1
"What some people are not acknowleging in this thread is that non-natives have a lot of the same issues"--quoted from 70sbratski

Indeed that's true--however it is also true that natives have issues to deal with that are totally unique to them and are so complicated and twisted by ancient treaty rules and decades of abuse (that is prevalent even today) that no non-native could truly understand.

Originally Posted by LonelyGhost
3. Aboriginal men who marry 'other' women retain their status the
women they marry can gain 'status' but an Aboriginal woman who
marries an non-Aboriginal loses her status ...

As per my original post, this law was finally changed in 1985, but the ripple effect can still be felt...

Originally Posted by InTheBum
"If it wasn't for the rest of the world, the Indians would still be living off the land, shitting in holes in the ground, sleeping on dirt, using leaves to heal wounds, and have a life expectancy of 45. Let's face it, they have no motivation...whether we came and concured, or not...

Empathy for people who are indifferent and users...bah..."

This post is almost too absurd to reply to but I will overstate the obvious for the poor lad.

Living off the land, ummm, yes please. You don't seem to understand that we had the advanced culture not the europeans. Native social structure led to the the first democratic belief that all men are created equal. No European ever was so lucky as to have such a benevolent arrangement. Only the few, the rich and the priviledged (everyone else was fodder)---hmmmm sound familiar?
Leave us to clean up the mess so called 'civilization' created and we'll be ecstatic to live off the land again!

Originally posted by MrBlonde

"i say wipe out reserves.

i say wipe out free education.

i say wipe out land claims."

No sir MrBlonde---the reserves are what's left of our birthwright (more often the worst land available that was so 'generously' granted to us)
The treaties of the late 1700's clearly state that we are our own people subject to the Crown but self-governing. Back then the Crown was trying hard to dodge a bullet when people started speaking out againt the slave trade and the appalling treatment of East Coast Indians. In order for our culture to survive we must have our own property to procreate and grow as is our right. Right now most reserves are bursting and overcrowded and cannot self sustain (ie:farmland and housing) with the exception of the casino reserves.
Many reservations are flourishing and respectable Chiefs are channelling the money for the good of the Nations. Few, especially out west in the Prairies have not yet gone through the process of treaty negotiations as it is not in the governments best interest to bring their rights to their attention. Self-interest groups don't want the Natives getting restless again so the legal process becomes bogged down with no resolutions in sight.
Leadership is the answer for many struggling Nations but more often than not wishy washy leaders are chosen to satiate an immediate need (cash grants) for poverty stricken families who aren't equipped to deal with the sudden winfall responsibly.

Originally Posted by Danika
I think Im aloud to start this because I am part Native LOL
(and no I don't collect any benifits)

*What do you call a group of indians sitting in a circle???

A full set of teeth!

*What is the difference between an indian funeral and an indian wedding???

One less drunk!

Anyone want to share some more native jokes?

Last week it was jokes about native children freezing to death and now this racist garbage.

Why is it that shit like this is so acceptable on perb and even considered funny?


I'm actually not so offended by Danika's jokes D.W.B. as every Indian has probably heard and or told them. Given the context (which is paramount in joke telling) Danika being part Native herself is trying to relieve tension through self-mockery.
I find alot of the veiled language being used by some the posters here to be much more offensive as they actually believe some of the stereotypes that have been spewed forth in this thread.
And people who don't understand why natives can't or more accurately DON'T WANT TO function in white man's world should study history a little more closely or keep their mouths shut before they make themselves look stupider than they already are. Make sure the sources for history are worthy as well.
Remember that the hunter tells his story of heroism and prowess, but who writes for the Lion??
 

GoodKat

Banned
Jun 1, 2007
478
0
0
www.furnitureporn.com
I'm actually not so offended by Danika's jokes D.W.B. as every Indian has probably heard and or told them. Given the context (which is paramount in joke telling) Danika being part Native herself is trying to relieve tension through self-mockery.
LOL!! New here, huh?

By Danika's own admission she has no ties other then blood to natives. So she is in no position to relieve the racial tensions of a people she does not identify with.
 
Last edited:

hugedman

Guest
Aug 25, 2004
2,140
4
0
Mars
If it wasn't for the rest of the world, the Indians would still be living off the land, shitting in holes in the ground, sleeping on dirt, using leaves to heal wounds, and have a life expectancy of 45. Let's face it, they have no motivation...whether we came and concured, or not...

Empathy for people who are indifferent and users...bah...

I guess, it is politically correct if you used "some of the First Nation people..." but not "they...". Not all First Nation people have no motivation...that's not true...
:cool:
 

Dakota Wood

Complex Goddess
Mar 2, 2005
585
0
0
53
Vancouver
I think Im aloud to start this because I am part Native LOL
(and no I don't collect any benifits)

*What do you call a group of indians sitting in a circle???

A full set of teeth!

*What is the difference between an indian funeral and an indian wedding???

One less drunk!

Anyone want to share some more native jokes?
Uh, no. But I am curious why it is that you were 'aloud' to post these and not banned by BCmod. These 'jokes' of yours are both racist and insulting. To preclude criticism with "I am part one so I can" is appalling, especially since you know so little about that part of your family tree. In my heritage there is a black person. Does that make it okay for me to make comments or jokes about porch monkeys eating watermelon and fried chicken, and washing it down with kool-aid? Hell no. It's sad to see that you are allowed to get away with this shit, considering things far less offensive were said by members who are not in red, yet they got spanked. Go figure.
 
Vancouver Escorts