Asian Fever

Welcome to the Socialist Nanny State

storm rider

Banned
Dec 6, 2008
2,542
7
0
Calgary
VANCOUVER - A Vancouver father says a "hugely disappointing" decision by social workers to stop his kids from riding the bus to school alone is robbing them of their independence.

Adrian Crook says he spent two years training his four eldest children, ages seven to 11, to take the 45-minute public transit trip. The case is sparking debate about whether expectations about parental supervision have gone too far.

"Your job as a parent is to raise your kids to not need you eventually," said Crook, who has five children.

"You don't want to rush them through that process, as much for them as it is heartbreaking for you. But if they're comfortable taking on certain risks, it's sort of incumbent upon you to gauge whether they're ready."

He said the 13-kilometre trip begins with a bus stop visible from his downtown condominium and ends with a stop directly in front of their North Vancouver school, and the children always travel with a cellphone that allows him to track their location.

Crook said his heart sank when the Children's Ministry called saying a tip had been received about the kids taking transit alone and that an investigation would follow.

"It was pretty shocking," he said. "I just kind of hoped that they would see the bigger picture."

He said he wanted his kids to take the bus because it's safer and more sustainable than driving and, crucially, it teaches them independence. A distant reason was to save money by using public transit, he said.

After a weeks-long investigation, the ministry concluded that children under the age of 10 cannot be left unsupervised — whether on a bus, riding bikes around the neighbourhood or walking to the corner store, he said.

Crook shares custody with the kids' mother, who lives closer to the school, so they were taking the bus half the time while staying with him. Now they can't even walk to school from her home, he said.

He said the ministry said its decision was based on a British Columbia court ruling that found an eight-year-old could not be left at home alone. It also said that in other provinces, the legal age to be unsupervised is much higher, including 16 in Ontario, he said.

In a statement, the ministry said it cannot comment on specific cases but when it receives a report about an unattended child, social workers assess the kid's safety and the parent's ability to provide care before taking the most appropriate course of action.

"If social workers determine there is a risk to a child (or) to children, their first step is to immediately reduce that risk," it said.

There is no precise legal age at which kids can be left unsupervised, nor is there a specific ministerial policy, the ministry added.

The Ontario Ministry of Children and Youth Services did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the claim that kids under 16 cannot be left unattended in the province.

Crook wrote about his situation on his blog, "5 Kids 1 Condo," and is now raising money online to mount a legal challenge.

Mariana Brussoni, a population and public health professor at the University of British Columbia, said the case highlights how social expectations for parents have changed in recent decades.

"You wouldn't in a million years dream of, 20 years ago, this sort of story happening," she said. "Nobody raised an eyebrow when kids were walking to school or taking the bus or getting themselves around."

Overprotective parenting has become normal and is harmful to children, who need to take risks and explore being on their own in order to build self-confidence, she said.

Brussoni said riding a bus is safer than being in a car.

There were no deaths of children 14 and under on buses in Canada between 2009 and 2013, according to the most recent available data from Statistics Canada. During the same period, 106 children died inside private vehicles.

WHAT A FUCKING JOKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jesus H Christ I cant believe this.Hell when I was 7 years old I either took the bus to school ALONE(but with classmates) or I actually walked and in the early spring and the late autumn I rode my bike to school and when I got home from school I let myself in the house with a key to the lock on the door.Got home and made myself a snack and watched cartoons on TV.In the winter at that same age and older after dinner I would get my snowsuit on and shovel side walks in the cold Alberta winter for $1-$3 a pop depending on the size of the job ....and EEK I would do it all ALONE at NIGHT TIME.....when I only had street lights for illumination and though I was a kid if some wierdo approached me for something nastry I was armed with a heft snow shovel that I could swing damn good.

This is just plain fucking stupid and I seriously hope the guy who got ratted out by some SJW finds out who it is so he can rip a vehement strip off of that POS.....and to be blunt a good beating of that POS would also be well deserved.

Whats next.....holding your hands over the ears of your kids as they watch Sesame Street incase Oscar the Grouch says something "Grouchy".

I am 100% behind the guy's motivations of making his kids less dependant and to encourage them to be self reliant as well as responsible not to mention being aware of their surroundings at all times.

SR
 

FreeG

Well-known member
Dec 25, 2015
549
341
63
Welcome back SR! Board's been far too quiet, progressive and nanny-ish over the last few weeks!

:hug:
 

Lo-ki

Well-known member
Jul 18, 2011
4,022
2,654
113
Check your closet..:)
The ministry must be bored.
WHAT A JOKE........
The more I hear about stupid people the more I love my cat.
 

clu

Active member
Oct 3, 2010
1,268
14
38
Vancouver
If that's the guy I'm thinking, he used to live in Mexico. It amuses me to think these people's heads would explode if they saw the routine there.

Though why doesn't he just argue the 11 year old is supervising the younger ones? I know a 12 year old can take a babysitting course, so obviously a 12 year old is considered a qualified supervisor. And they're saying 10 is the cutoff not 12.
 

storm rider

Banned
Dec 6, 2008
2,542
7
0
Calgary
Welcome back SR! Board's been far too quiet, progressive and nanny-ish over the last few weeks!

:hug:
Well guess what.....when you express Conservative mind think and espouse anti Socialist values you get a vacation....I guess if somebody feels insulted and whines to the mods it also adds to it.I will stand my ground but at the same time not insult other members with regards to my beliefs in the future. (MOD EDIT - No, you get banned, when you resort to name calling and insulting those who disagree with you)

That being said I would like to put the Alberta Finace Minister in my cross hairs....Joe Cici is his name and I cant think of a more incompetant buffoon to be the Minister of Fiance for Alberta.Right off the bat he is sinking Albertans into multi generational DEBT....and at the same time this over paid and under qualified POS who was a fucking Social Worker before he got into politics cant even do the minimum for ALL of the PERKS that he gets he cant seem to get decent dental work done as he still looks like a rat faced snaggle toothed bastard.... a slimey illegegitemate sprog maybe produced by Lougheed when maybe he got shit faced drunk and picked up an skanky street walker near the Cecil back in that day and stupidly spawned a Socialist bastard son that was still fruit of his loins....go back 2 generations and that same snaggle toothed bastard would have been happily offered up for front line service in WW1 or WW2 in the hopes the bugger got shot and thereby removing the chances of him procreating and having a son.

I do hope this does not offend anybody.

SR
 

storm rider

Banned
Dec 6, 2008
2,542
7
0
Calgary
It doesn't offend me in the least. I am a firm believer in free speech. How else can we know how ignorant someone is?
How do you define "ignorant"....to you is that a person who acts "ignorantly" in public with no regards to the comfort of others such as a restaurant or is that person "ignorant" because they espouse views that you feel the person is "ignorant" of the facts being discussed?

Personally I am not "ignorant" in both of those sentiments.I was raised by a British father who ingrained proper manners into me as a child and if I choose to voice an opinion based upon my knowledge and beliefs I sure as fucking hell back it up with facts.

To respond to you well it is a FACT that the NDP in Alberta have gone from a itty bitty defecit when they took over and they are now at 40 BILLION in DEBT.Joe CiCi is the Finance Minister and as a former Social Worker he is way out of his depth and scope of expertise.He IS a rat faced snaggle toothed MOFO.....when he smiles my first thought is "can I kick a field goal"

If you think Socialism is a good model for governance take a look at the history of the USSR.It failed miserably....and for 50+ years people were subjugated and put to death either directly under the hands of the KGB or died from being sent to work camps in Siberia.

SR
 

sybian

Well-known member
Dec 23, 2014
3,614
955
113
Kamloops B.C.
How do you define "ignorant"....to you is that a person who acts "ignorantly" in public with no regards to the comfort of others such as a restaurant or is that person "ignorant" because they espouse views that you feel the person is "ignorant" of the facts being discussed?

Personally I am not "ignorant" in both of those sentiments.I was raised by a British father who ingrained proper manners into me as a child and if I choose to voice an opinion based upon my knowledge and beliefs I sure as fucking hell back it up with facts.

To respond to you well it is a FACT that the NDP in Alberta have gone from a itty bitty defecit when they took over and they are now at 40 BILLION in DEBT.Joe CiCi is the Finance Minister and as a former Social Worker he is way out of his depth and scope of expertise.He IS a rat faced snaggle toothed MOFO.....when he smiles my first thought is "can I kick a field goal"

If you think Socialism is a good model for governance take a look at the history of the USSR.It failed miserably....and for 50+ years people were subjugated and put to death either directly under the hands of the KGB or died from being sent to work camps in Siberia.

SR
I agree with some of what you said....Social workers are not in reality, and only draw from their substandard training, and having dealt with people with challenges in their lives ,have a very altered view on society . I also agree that Socialism isn't a good way to Govern a nation that is built on individual rights, and general freedoms. However some of our social programs are Socialist based in nature.
..Stalin used socialism to control an entire people, and starved , or otherwise murdred 16 million people....There was no democracy device to expel him from absolute power.
He also wasn't a substitute Drama teacher with a trust fund.....He was a butcher, that controlled with fear, and a pretty freaking tough War Machine to back him up....oh ...and he was also half insane.
For the record......of the millions sent to Siberia...2% survived, only to return home to starve to death with the rest of their families.....or fight the German Nazis years later with three rounds in their rifles, and a single meal every second day...unless of course they found some war horse meat on the ground.
I know because I've heard the stories around the supper table with my family....they were there...and they believe Canada is not perfect.....but this country is their divine sanctuary, no matter what party has been elected into power at the time.
 

zigzag6984

New member
Apr 17, 2017
56
0
0
I mean, if more people are forced to live in condos/apartments in the city, should we not expect this to become common place? Isn't this what Mayor Moonbeam has dreamed of?
 

storm rider

Banned
Dec 6, 2008
2,542
7
0
Calgary
I mean, if more people are forced to live in condos/apartments in the city, should we not expect this to become common place? Isn't this what Mayor Moonbeam has dreamed of?
Wow you are seriously out of touch with regards to your response to this thread.....so out of touch that I can only think you were seriously STONED when you posted your reply as it has nothing to do with the topic in any way.

sybian did have a well thought out response which was backed up by FACTS.....thank you sybian for that.

zigzag.....well to be honest your reply to this thread only makes me feel "dumb downed".........please dont post unless you have something relevant or related to add to the content.

SR
 

rampart

Active member
Sep 1, 2005
316
151
43
And the reason the Simpsons have been on the air for 18 years-----NO SHORTAGE OF STUPID PEOPLE TO WRITE ABOUT FOR A STORYLINE!!!

Ministry Staff have really taken things a bit too far on this one. I support this father as someone who is teaching his kids about streetsmarts.
 

rlock

Well-known member
May 20, 2015
2,281
1,360
113
It's pretty absurd that they freak out about this, and other things. I rode the bus alone at that age. I walked home. If I didn't know how to take the bus by myself by age 10, my parents would have worried I was retarded.

Today, they do not allow children to be unattended, ever. They have to be driven to school (and get obese from lack of exercise).

There's also no consistency to it - if these kids rode a bike from school, he would be OK, but if they take a bus or play in a park near their house, it's child abuse ?!

Problem is, the authorities write rules based on potential liability, and make no distinctions between the parents who let their kids have some reasonable autonomy vs. those who pretty much abandon their kids 24/7 until they turn into feral delinquents.
 

Ms Erica Phoenix

Satisfaction Provider
Jun 24, 2013
5,314
7
0
60
In Your Wildest Dreams!
It's pretty absurd that they freak out about this, and other things. I rode the bus alone at that age. I walked home. If I didn't know how to take the bus by myself by age 10, my parents would have worried I was retarded.

Today, they do not allow children to be unattended, ever. They have to be driven to school (and get obese from lack of exercise).

There's also no consistency to it - if these kids rode a bike from school, he would be OK, but if they take a bus or play in a park near their house, it's child abuse ?!

Problem is, the authorities write rules based on potential liability, and make no distinctions between the parents who let their kids have some reasonable autonomy vs. those who pretty much abandon their kids 24/7 until they turn into feral delinquents.
I walked home just about every day from school, starting in first grade, & the route included crossing Austin Avenue in Coquitlam. My mom arranged with a 6th grader to walk me back to her house in our neighbourhood, & then on to our house. EVERYONE walked home from school. As a 10 year old, I used to take the bus from Coquitlam to the corner of Broadway & Cambie by myself after school twice a week (I even got to leave early!!!) because I went to an elite ballet school. The first time I tried it, I didn't get to the door in time to get off before the bus turned into an express...That was a life lesson, and it didn't happen again. I asked the bus driver what to do, & he told me where to cross the street to go back in the opposite direction. Nobody called CPS on my mom & dad; there was no hue & cry. The next time I had to take that bus, I made sure that I was at the exit door before I pulled the bell. Lesson learned. When I began teaching, I saw most of the students walking to school by themselves, or in small groups. When I left teaching, it was rare for students to walk to school or walk home completely on their own unless they lived on the same street as the school. Once that school grew to the point where we had 600+ students, most of whose parents wanted to pick their kids up out front? Ridiculous.
 
Vancouver Escorts