I'm sorry if it's been asked before but I'm curious.. and really interested on getting your perspective on this - as I've never had to choose an sp myself! I've been told by some that they will not review their "regulars" but will review others.
What determines who you decide to review? Or not to review?
~~~
Some reviewers also seem to say that they've waited to post a (good) review about their most recent SP as all others prior to that were bad/not memorable. In response to that comment, others have said that perhaps those experiences should have been shared in a review as well since it is also good info to have (good, bad, mediocre) when making their decision..
What do you think should determine who to write a review about? (What kind of information do you look for and is useful for you when reading reviews and trying to decide on a specific SP)?
~~~
And finally, I also read a few times ppl questionning the need to review the same SP over and over again in a short period of time.
Is there a point when any additionnal reviews of the same SP do not make any difference to you or help you make a decision and the information seems redondant? Or do you feel there can never be enough? How much is too much?
Discuss..




