36 out of 50 states and the federal government of the USA have not declared a moratorium ... what's your point?reddog said:"I now favor a moratorium, because I have grave concerns about our state's shameful record of convicting INNOCENT people and putting them on death row," Governor Ryan said (former REPUBLICAN Governor in 2000, the moratorium he established then is still in effect)." (My emphasis).
And sounding like Michael Moore is so bad because...?
personally, i am neither for or against the death penalty, i have heard good arguments from both sides.
what i do believe in however, is the democratic process and the due process of the law. if a particular juristiction has capital punishment, and someone is convicted of capital crime in that juristiction and receives the death penalty, then i am ok with that.
conversely if someone receives "life without" in a juristiction without capital punishment, then i am ok with that also.
allen received the death penalty because he chose to commit a capital crime in a state with capital punishment.
do you know the facts of the allen case. do you know that allen was given the death sentence for arranging the murder of 3 people while he was serving a "life without the possibilty of parole" sentence?
anyway, the only reason i jumped into this thread was because, i read the opinion that rescusitating someone in distress was an inhumane thing ...
i'd like to hear your opinion on that reddog ... ?
oh ... and i did not say sounding like michael moore is a bad thing. i find his documentaries highly entertaining, but if i want an objective veiwpoint of a topic i do not rely on michael moore for it.