Are you like.... drunk, lol ... seems like it is more about them being Hindus than anything else.couldn't watch the entire video, but girls all over my highschools did exactly this thing, and it wasn't really about religion (they were hindu I grew up in Surrey lol), they just didn't want to lose their real virginity in highschool and be called a "slut", and they only did it with their long term boyfriends not random dudes. And hey, it worked! Their reputations are intact, except I knew about it and never told anyone because I'm not a bitch like thatBut you can be sure they went and blabbed their mouths about every other girl who had real sex the first chance they got. I remember they would do it in the forests, anal sex in the forest during lunch time, no lube...
Yep one of my girlfriends in the past would attest to this. 15 yrs old having sex for the first time - and it was anal. It was nothing but anal for at least 6 months, then finally she relented under pressure from her boyfriend to do pussy sex. Then apparently it wasn't fun for him anymore because she couldn't get on the pill without her parents finding out, and he was used to cumming inside her (ass) and now couldn't cum in her pussy.couldn't watch the entire video, but girls all over my highschools did exactly this thing, and it wasn't really about religion (they were hindu I grew up in Surrey lol), they just didn't want to lose their real virginity in highschool and be called a "slut", and they only did it with their long term boyfriends not random dudes. And hey, it worked! Their reputations are intact, except I knew about it and never told anyone because I'm not a bitch like thatBut you can be sure they went and blabbed their mouths about every other girl who had real sex the first chance they got. I remember they would do it in the forests, anal sex in the forest during lunch time, no lube...
Where did you get that info?Wow...Not sure if others are aware, girls under the age of 18 are not legally able to consent to anal sex. Not using condoms either? Wow. I'm speechless.
She may not get pregnant, but her risk factors for HIV are very high.Where did you get that info?
It doesn't sound correct.
I'll say one thing about doing analsex as a teenage girl, you won't get pregnant.
She may not get pregnant, but her risk factors for HIV are very high.
http://www.sexualityandu.ca/sexual-health/sex-and-the-law
Age of Consent
The age of consent refers to the age at which people are able to make their own decisions about sexual activity. In Canada, the age of consent was raised from 14 to 16 in 2008, with the passage of the Tackling Violent Crime Act. However, some exceptions to this age of consent remain. Unmarried persons under the age of 18 cannot consent to anal sex.[/QUOTE
No. from the Dept. of Justice website, no mention of "Unmarried persons under the age of 18 cannot consent to anal sex"
http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/other-autre/clp/faq.html
Anal intercourseShe may not get pregnant, but her risk factors for HIV are very high.
http://www.sexualityandu.ca/sexual-health/sex-and-the-law
Age of Consent
The age of consent refers to the age at which people are able to make their own decisions about sexual activity. In Canada, the age of consent was raised from 14 to 16 in 2008, with the passage of the Tackling Violent Crime Act. However, some exceptions to this age of consent remain. Unmarried persons under the age of 18 cannot consent to anal sex.[/QUOTE
No. from the Dept. of Justice website, no mention of "Unmarried persons under the age of 18 cannot consent to anal sex"
http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/other-autre/clp/faq.html
159 (1) Every person who engages in an act of anal intercourse is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Marginal note:Exception
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to any act engaged in, in private, between
(a) husband and wife, or
(b) any two persons, each of whom is eighteen years of age or more,
both of whom consent to the act.
Marginal note:Idem
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2),
(a) an act shall be deemed not to have been engaged in in private if it is engaged in in a public place or if more than two persons take part or are present; and
(b) a person shall be deemed not to consent to an act
(i) if the consent is extorted by force, threats or fear of bodily harm or is obtained by false and fraudulent misrepresentations respecting the nature and quality of the act, or
(ii) if the court is satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the person could not have consented to the act by reason of mental disability.
R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 159; R.S., 1985, c. 19 (3rd Supp.), s. 3.
If you are having sex with HIV positive people I'm guessing your risk factor for catching it is very high no matter what hole you are letting them stick it in.She may not get pregnant, but her risk factors for HIV are very high.
This seems comical to me - the law doesn't care why they're married without being adults. Ordinary consent not enough, but if you're in some sect that forces a ring on some little girl's finger, then knocking on her back door is A-OK.Anal Sex
The Criminal Code of Canada states that persons under the age of 18 cannot engage in anal intercourse except if they are legally married.
Many laws in Canada and the world are based on religious or christian beliefs, not common sense.From your first link
Anal Sex
The Criminal Code of Canada states that persons under the age of 18 cannot engage in anal intercourse except if they are legally married. For those over the age of 18, anal intercourse is legal only when it is practiced in private between 2 consenting adults. This section of the Criminal Code has been declared unconstitutional by federal courts of appeal, as well as by courts of appeal in Ontario, British Columbia and Quebec. The courts in this case ruled that a higher age of consent for anal sex, than for vaginal sex, discriminated against gay men and violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom.
Come on, the risk of getting infected with HIV from unprotected anal sex is much greater than protected virginal sex.If you are having sex with HIV positive people I'm guessing your risk factor for catching it is very high no matter what hole you are letting them stick it in.
Until it is amended or removed it is still a part of the criminal code and can be applied regardless if it is unconstitutional or not. A judge may throw it out, but the person has already been arrested, charged and gone through the system to end up in court.(snip)
"As long as the Criminal Code remains unchanged, the possibility that people could be charged with this offence still exists."(snip)
You failed to mention that section is unconstitutional as found by the courts so probability of being charged are very slim as it would be throw out by the courts





