This is just about the details in regards a positive experience, the '"action", etc.........not things like cost, their personal life, etc. Here are some thoughts......
Over the years, different boards and cities I've found a very similar conundrum. The details when sharing. What details are relevant. What details the provider wish to remain private during a positive experience. Of course on a negative they don't want anyone knowing. You have some providers that have a no review policy, some that encourage them, some that push for them, some care very lil and random outliers/unique situations.
My mind set has been to give back what info I can to help others make better informed decisions on who to see. In my younger days I really could've have used info like that and places like here didn't exist. The more we can weed out the bad and praise the good is a win win for this hobby. Less money and bad experiences lost to robs and bad providers, more money toward the good ones and better experiences for us all.
Ok so what am I suppose to write. For the most part that's up to you. Yes, a provider may wish you not write blow by blow thrust by thrust detail. And really, many don't need a 10 page erotica writing. What do people reading want? "Usually", that can be anywhere from menu, looks, rates, extras, quirks, what to watch out for and some kind of summary. There are some details your provider may not want known....as an example. In my younger days on another forum I posted about a provider letting me FIR but I was a regular yet multiple people going to see her for the 1st time wanted to shove their whole hand in her bum. So I had to rewrite the review but it caused some drama. Some can't understand a benefit/menu item a regular would get vs a 1st time client. And Im sure we all know providers who have "other things" they are open to the more comfortable they are with you/ the more they see you. Should you check with your provider about/before posting a review? You shouldn't have to, can be a courtesy and most do not do this.
What if she asks for a review? This is more rare but can happen. It will be up to you. The majority of clients a provider will see probably isn't even on here. Not sure what the stats are but I would guess less then 10%. On one end of the spectrum Ive had ladies who are newer or just get back from a long absence ask for a review but never asked to embellish. To being asked by an org to review a lady Ive never seen before as to help her get her footing.
What not to write? There are things you can't/shouldn't share like a providers private life. If you know them or details of them outside of this hobby. Their other work, life, residence etc. Exact addresses are also a no. Can you still write a review if a provider has a no review policy on her requirements to see her, yes. But keep in mind you maybe blacklisted from her and her possible long network of connections in the industry. This of course is not referring to the Perb small list of do not review ladies.
These are just my thoughts not an end all be all dissertation. Feel free to chime in. For the most part there isn't really a right or wrong answer to this. Its ok to disagree.
.
Over the years, different boards and cities I've found a very similar conundrum. The details when sharing. What details are relevant. What details the provider wish to remain private during a positive experience. Of course on a negative they don't want anyone knowing. You have some providers that have a no review policy, some that encourage them, some that push for them, some care very lil and random outliers/unique situations.
My mind set has been to give back what info I can to help others make better informed decisions on who to see. In my younger days I really could've have used info like that and places like here didn't exist. The more we can weed out the bad and praise the good is a win win for this hobby. Less money and bad experiences lost to robs and bad providers, more money toward the good ones and better experiences for us all.
Ok so what am I suppose to write. For the most part that's up to you. Yes, a provider may wish you not write blow by blow thrust by thrust detail. And really, many don't need a 10 page erotica writing. What do people reading want? "Usually", that can be anywhere from menu, looks, rates, extras, quirks, what to watch out for and some kind of summary. There are some details your provider may not want known....as an example. In my younger days on another forum I posted about a provider letting me FIR but I was a regular yet multiple people going to see her for the 1st time wanted to shove their whole hand in her bum. So I had to rewrite the review but it caused some drama. Some can't understand a benefit/menu item a regular would get vs a 1st time client. And Im sure we all know providers who have "other things" they are open to the more comfortable they are with you/ the more they see you. Should you check with your provider about/before posting a review? You shouldn't have to, can be a courtesy and most do not do this.
What if she asks for a review? This is more rare but can happen. It will be up to you. The majority of clients a provider will see probably isn't even on here. Not sure what the stats are but I would guess less then 10%. On one end of the spectrum Ive had ladies who are newer or just get back from a long absence ask for a review but never asked to embellish. To being asked by an org to review a lady Ive never seen before as to help her get her footing.
What not to write? There are things you can't/shouldn't share like a providers private life. If you know them or details of them outside of this hobby. Their other work, life, residence etc. Exact addresses are also a no. Can you still write a review if a provider has a no review policy on her requirements to see her, yes. But keep in mind you maybe blacklisted from her and her possible long network of connections in the industry. This of course is not referring to the Perb small list of do not review ladies.
These are just my thoughts not an end all be all dissertation. Feel free to chime in. For the most part there isn't really a right or wrong answer to this. Its ok to disagree.
.
Last edited:






