The Charter of Rights and Freedoms has been used to defend a lot of really questionable so-called causes, but a new low has to be the Charter Challenge by Ontario dog owners saying the proposed ban on pit bulls violates their rights. Who has a state supported right to own a dog? And who has the right to own a state supported potential killing machine? I don't think a breed-specific ban is the answer to vicious dog attacks, but a challenge to the Charter is just another example of greedy lawyers who will take any dubious case.
The Charter
- Thread starter Cock Throppled
- Start date
i wrote something intelligent about this and then the fucking neighbours stupid dogs (there are a total of 12 dogs in 5 houses on this street) started barking on masse and all i have to say is:
dog owners are stupid.
dog owners are stupid.
Dog Owners
I am the proud owner of two beautiful puppies. They are both under a year old and I can say that neither of them are allowed to bark at the neighbours. My dogs get maybe two barks out before they are told to shut up and get in the house. Not all dog owners are stupid... just irresponsable ones
I am the proud owner of two beautiful puppies. They are both under a year old and I can say that neither of them are allowed to bark at the neighbours. My dogs get maybe two barks out before they are told to shut up and get in the house. Not all dog owners are stupid... just irresponsable ones
