There were many many replies to this posted tweet most people thought the answer was 16 so there’s that context. Base six or base 7? Seriously doubt that applies in this case. Most of the numb nuts that replied to the Twitter post don’t grasp base 10, never mind base 6 or 7.No, you cannot draw any conclusions from this. We don't know how many people knew the answer, but didn't find their choice. Maybe 1,000,000 people wanted to answer and only 100 were wrong, or misclicked, or answered as a joke.
Not knowing the context, one could consider it might be not a base-ten problem (where the answer is 10), but base-six (where 14 is the correct answer) or base-seven (where the answer is 13).
3x+1 = 0Want a real challenge?
3x+1
The curse of the smartphone.I think the basics are being skimmed and critical thinking is being replaced by looking things up.
Yup and the fact that a reply to a general discussion on an open forum with an inflammatory post tells you everything you need to know about 'some' of perb's demographics.The fact that a random tweet that has no context whatsoever is inferred by this group as meaning the current generation is dumber than the previous generations tells you everything you need to know about Perb's demographic.
Abe Lincoln. Wasn’t his nickname Old Rail Splitter?The curse of the smartphone.
Everyone googles random facts but nobody actually knows anything. Anyone can come up with Abraham Lincoln’s birth date while knowing nothing about him.
And how trustworthy is the source?
Neither the original post nor any of the responses are based upon anything more than anecdotal experience (if even!). If you don't think the opinion of these majority posts are built upon very obvious biases, then you're clearly not very introspective.Yup and the fact that a reply to a general discussion on an open forum with an inflammatory post tells you everything you need to know about 'some' of perb's demographics.
Clearly as your posts illustrate such introspection.Neither the original post nor any of the responses are based upon anything more than anecdotal experience (if even!). If you don't think the opinion of these majority posts are built upon very obvious biases, then you're clearly not very introspective.
That doesn't even make any sense. My post merely points out that the other posts were made without any basis, but just anecdotal experience. It's not an opinion, so why would it require me to be introspective?Clearly as your posts illustrate such introspection.
Thing is, I'm right.
LOL. First, you assumed it was equal to zero.3x+1 = 0
3x = -1
x = -1/3
No, I don’t see myself as Good Will Hunting. 😅
Why bother attempting to match wits with you since you're half equipped. No fun in that.That doesn't even make any sense. My post merely points out that the other posts were made without any basis, but just anecdotal experience. It's not an opinion, so why would it require me to be introspective?
What are you even "right" about? Just because you disagree with something doesn't make you "right". If you want to have a conversation, I'm all for it... just make some sense please.
Classic resort to insult... you do you, man.Why bother attempting to match wits with you since you're half equipped. No fun in that.




