Some members seem to have a problem with this policy lately, for newer members and a reminder for everyone this policy was introduced for two reasons, members were using it as a weapon to get free sessions by threatening to post a review saying the provider was offering BBFS and keep the lawyers happy because that kind of post could have legal consequences for PERB. In the last few weeks there has been a significant increase number of complaints about this issue, so we’re going to be focusing on this matter with increased attention. No matter how you try and allude to BBFS it can result in a visit to perbatory, is it really worth it? I’ll leave this open for questions but the policy is not going to change!
PERB’s no BBFS discussion policy
- Thread starter MB Mod
- Start date
The 🔊of a 🧨whip or ⛈, would doubly emphasize the mods post. But I couldn't find a sound bit for it.
I concurr with the mods on their reasoning for this particular rule.
A side note:
For people agreeing with the mods should they should have:
🧨 = concurr
🧨🧨 = firmly agree with
🧨🧨🧨= law for all eterity
I concurr with the mods on their reasoning for this particular rule.
A side note:
For people agreeing with the mods should they should have:
🧨 = concurr
🧨🧨 = firmly agree with
🧨🧨🧨= law for all eterity
