Nah, it's a realistic attitude based on the fact Vancouver struggles with Chicago,
just like NJ struggles with Philly, as my previous post pointed out. NJ was not
fortunate to get that first round matchup with the Flyers. Every team has at
least one team they don't match up as well with and is better off avoiding in
the postseason if they want to go all the way to win the cup which, if you win,
arguably makes you the best, regardless of who you face on the way.
As for beating the best, who is the judge of who is better? If Nashville beats
Chicago does that mean they are superior to the Hawks? If so and Vancouver
were to face Nashville then they would be playing the better of the two,
wouldn't they? Which would make your point null and void.
Who is the best? The team with the most regular season points {Caps}?
The reigning champs {Pens}? The team in the finals the last two years
and on fire going into the postseason {Wings}? The top West team {SJ}?
"San Antonio Spurs head coach Gregg Popovich, speaking before Sunday's game in Los Angeles, knows his team is the seventh seed in the West thanks to its two-game winning streak and wants no part of falling back into the eighth seed and a playoff matchup with the top-seeded Lakers.
"The ones that say, 'We don't care who we play,' they're full of baloney," Popovich said. "We're all trying to hide from the Lakers in the first round and that's the truth.
"Really, it's like, 'Who do you want to play in the first round?,'" Popovich continued before sarcastically answering his question. "Oh, the Lakers! We'll play the Lakers!"
http://sports.espn.go.com/los-angeles/nba/news/story?id=5054742&source=NBAHeadlines